The Baseball Book Club discussion

This topic is about
The Year of the Pitcher
note: This topic has been closed to new comments.
Current Books & Discussions
>
Discussion of “Year of the Pitcher”
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Lance
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars
Aug 01, 2019 08:12AM

reply
|
flag

That’s why I enjoyed this, Karen. It is more than sports by giving a good feel for the tensions going on during the era. Glad to have you in on the discussion.

Harold wrote: "Karen wrote: "I'm still reading this book, so I haven't formed an overall opinion. I have enoyed what I have read so far. What I like is that the book has a good mix of politics and race relations ..."
I've been to Detroit--if that is saved, we're in big trouble.
Of course we know you meant McLain, not Lolich Harold on the grooved Mantle pitch. Lolich was busy eating doughnuts.
I hadn't heard that about Drysdale. Too bad umpires applied that rationalization arbitrarily. Milt Pappas went to his grave believing that Bruce Freoming hosed him by not giving him the benefit of the doubt on a 9th inning, 2-out, full count pitch that was called ball 4 and ruined his perfect game. I guess you only get that call if you guest star on the Brady Bunch and the Lucy Show.
I've been to Detroit--if that is saved, we're in big trouble.
Of course we know you meant McLain, not Lolich Harold on the grooved Mantle pitch. Lolich was busy eating doughnuts.
I hadn't heard that about Drysdale. Too bad umpires applied that rationalization arbitrarily. Milt Pappas went to his grave believing that Bruce Freoming hosed him by not giving him the benefit of the doubt on a 9th inning, 2-out, full count pitch that was called ball 4 and ruined his perfect game. I guess you only get that call if you guest star on the Brady Bunch and the Lucy Show.

This topic has been frozen by the moderator. No new comments can be posted.