Classics and the Western Canon discussion
Discussion - Don Quixote
>
Week 9 - through the end of Book 2
date
newest »


So much of the second book seems to be a response to the first book, and the rogue sequel, that it really appears that Cervantes took offense at the reception that the first book received and resolved to make the second installment greater and more definitive than the first. And though there is the whiff of cliche about it, there is no way to define your character more than to kill him off.
If there was one thing that bugged me about this book it was the quick and shallow death of Don Quixote. In the course of a few pages (after hundreds) he regains his "sanity" and dies. It's almost as if an editor stepped in and said "Enough already!" It doesn't exactly ruin the book as a whole for me, but I found the ending deeply disappointing. It seems cheap somehow.

Way to tell it, Thomas! I like your points, and am definitely with you on the ending of the book.

I agree. Great post, Thomas!
As for the ending, how about this? A sane Don Quixote is not Don Quixote at all. There is nothing left to do but die.
Does Don Quixote remind anyone of Elwood P. Dowd in Harvey?
We come now to the last section of Don Quixote. It's been a long but fascinating journey -- let's finish it up in style! After this week, we'll have one more week for discussion of the book as a whole (have you firmed up your views yet on a) what Cervantes was trying to accomplish with the book and b) how successful he was?).