Goodreads Ireland discussion
note: This topic has been closed to new comments.
Inactive Discussions
>
New Moderator and Discussion of Group Guidelines

But I don't think theres an easy way to do anything about voting anyway.
It wiuld be great if all voters were intending to partake but theres no easy line to draw.
It does seem odd to me that someone votes , reads the book but never comments though. Seems a bit pointless but to each their own I suppose.



And thats true Seraphina. And this group is great at coming up with a range of books

I am sometimes relieved when a book I am not interested in reading wins. I am in 2 other face-to-face book club and have lots of books in my 'to read' pile. So I am probably one of those people who doesn't get in the discussion when a book I wasn't interested in doesn't get chosen. Even in my face to face groups, people skip months when the selection is not something they want to read. I am not particularly a science fiction, fantasy etc. fan but I did "To Say Nothing of the Dog". I have read a couple of books I wouldn't have read ordinarily including The Cuckoo's Calling (so so wouldn't recommend necesarily). I tried to look up our polls but only found some from 2011. I get loads of ideas of what to read from this group including American authors I've never read such as Steinbeck and Vonnegut not to mention Willy Vlautin and Tim O'Brien.

I'm reading Irelandnow please don't delete that thread yet .


Thanks :)




I always thought things got a little hectic around the time of quarterly reads for Declan , with following three nomination threads and setting up the polls .
Why not leave the monthly read nominations and polls to the same time of the month but on a month with the films and Irish reads why not split the effort out and do their nominations and polls a week or so earlier. It might make them easier to manage and tracj

It's an interesting suggestion Paul, but personally I think I'd rather just devote a chunk of focused time to the task of doing the polls rather than spread it out. That's just my working style though. Just FYI Emma and I have agreed that I will mostly be responsible for figuring out the technical side and conducting the polls.
Also to the best of our recollection: The timeline for the voting process usually goes:
Nominations: 21st - 24th
Initial vote: 25th - 27th
Tie break vote: 28th - 30th
Does that match whatever one else remembers?
We will be following the same tie breaking system that we have been doing. We will both still vote in the initial vote and then abstain from the tie break vote. If there's still a tie after that second round of voting we will alternate who casts it.
I think for the time being, we're going to stay away from any qualifications on who is allowed to nominate and vote on books. It seems like a bit of a headache to police, and we're not sure it's really necessary.
I am going to update the group info page with description of the tie break process.
Also to the best of our recollection: The timeline for the voting process usually goes:
Nominations: 21st - 24th
Initial vote: 25th - 27th
Tie break vote: 28th - 30th
Does that match whatever one else remembers?
We will be following the same tie breaking system that we have been doing. We will both still vote in the initial vote and then abstain from the tie break vote. If there's still a tie after that second round of voting we will alternate who casts it.
I think for the time being, we're going to stay away from any qualifications on who is allowed to nominate and vote on books. It seems like a bit of a headache to police, and we're not sure it's really necessary.
I am going to update the group info page with description of the tie break process.







I think it is a good idea to say that if you nominate and/or vote for a book you should at least be in the discussion but I also agree that sometimes life gets in the way of achieving this goal.
I also think that it would be very difficult to police and tedious to monitor who can and can't vote and nominate books to read. I think this would make too much work for the moderators.
Thank you to Sara and Emma for taking up these positions.

"
I don't think you're making the role of a moderator demanding enough Fiona. I mean they don't have enough work to do as it is. Moderators should read *everything* that we nominate in the poll, and that's an order.
As for the winning book each month, I think they should come to each of our houses, and read us to sleep while feeding us grapes, and gently stroking our hair.

I think this will be the beauty of two mods. If one is busy the other will more than likely be involved in reading the monthly book.
Nice to ease a bit of pressure.
John I'm not sure where the hostile tone of your post came from. I think Fiona point is a good one. As I have previously stated in this thread, I plan to read all the monthly and quarterly selections (including titles I may not have read as a mere group member because I didn't care for them). That said, emergencies/busy periods happen. The beauty of having two moderators is that we can back each other up if that happens. I would also hope (but again stuff happens) that if someone nominates a book, they're willing to participate in the discussion of that book.
Recently I did not read Good Omens (but I had read in many times previously so I believe I contributed to the discussion anyway). Back at the beginning of the year I had a streak where I didn't read three of the monthly reads (Stoner, The Things They Carried, The Book Thief) and one of the quarterly reads (The Third Policeman) either due to lack of interest (The Book Thief and The Things they Carried) or time (the other two). As I'm now moderator though I'll put a much higher priority on finishing all the books.

I've been struggling to get with the vibe of this group for a while. The last few interactions are nails in the coffin. We ain't ever gonna click.
Doubt there'll be any broken hearts for my departure :) :) :)
Slan

I hope to see you around again.
I thought your post was nicely cheeky.
Its a shame as you bring a quirky taste to the group.
Slan agus beatha



Everyone is a little sensitive at the moment with recent events and it will all settle down.
I hope you stay Kate.


Food for thought.



I don't think that there is any less chat about books in the group than when I joined, but it's just that there are a lot more asides because of the number of people posting.
But hey, things change, and groups develop. One doesn't have to take part in every discussion, and as long as people are pleasant to each other, I can't see an issue.
I hope that my thoughts make some sense...
I echo what Emma has said. I've also talked to John and although he's going to take a break, I don't think he bears anyone any ill will. I definitely apologize for misunderstanding his initial comment. If anyone has any concerns with how the group is being run, don't hesitate
I also echo what Allan said. In particular, if we could try to keep the various asides in the appropriate threads (Nothing to Books with books etc.) it would make it much easier for those who want to just focus on the book discussions to find them.
Finally, thanks Trelawn for you kind words about us non-Irish members of Goodreads Ireland!. I definitely appreciate that this group has an Irish character. I like that we have a quarterly read, and that Allan in particular has shared many Irish authors and book news from his of the words. If anyone has suggestions about how to interject even more Irish content into the group, I (and I'm sure Emma as well) would love to hear it. Someone in a private message to me suggested an Irish history thread which I'll be putting up soon. Aside from that, the group and its content are only as strong as what our members contribute.
I also echo what Allan said. In particular, if we could try to keep the various asides in the appropriate threads (Nothing to Books with books etc.) it would make it much easier for those who want to just focus on the book discussions to find them.
Finally, thanks Trelawn for you kind words about us non-Irish members of Goodreads Ireland!. I definitely appreciate that this group has an Irish character. I like that we have a quarterly read, and that Allan in particular has shared many Irish authors and book news from his of the words. If anyone has suggestions about how to interject even more Irish content into the group, I (and I'm sure Emma as well) would love to hear it. Someone in a private message to me suggested an Irish history thread which I'll be putting up soon. Aside from that, the group and its content are only as strong as what our members contribute.

Sara, your ideas about extra threads are great for the group, but don't be giving yourself unnecessary work. As I said above, there's no less book related content in the threads than ever there was-it's just that sometimes it gets lost in the prolific posting. But that's what makes the group what it is-something that I don't want to change, but which may rankle with the odd person.
And regarding Irish content, I know that there was a time that it was purely Irish reads, but the rules were changed because people wanted more variety. I think the quarterly read is perfect, and at the end of the day, if someone wants to nominate an Irish book at any time, people are free to vote for it!
And can I just reiterate that both Sara and Emma are doing an excellent job; it's just impossible to keep all the people happy all of the time.

But we will miss you here and i do hope you and Declan return at some point.
This topic has been frozen by the moderator. No new comments can be posted.
Books mentioned in this topic
Ireland (other topics)Ireland (other topics)
Theresa where did you get the information about who's commented and who hasn't? If this is something easy to look up for the moderators, we may be more inclined to try it. I might even go so far as to say that people should have made one comment within the past year to qualify (if I could find that information easily).