SciFi and Fantasy Book Club discussion

This topic is about
Ursula K. Le Guin
Recommendations and Lost Books
>
Which Ursula K. Le Guin book should I start with?
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Kristy
(new)
Jul 12, 2019 05:35PM

reply
|
flag


Personally for me, the original Earthsea trilogy is a much-loved fav, with the third book, The Farthest Shore being an all-time fav. However, to get its full power, you have to read the other two first (but they're also excellent).
IMO, Prince Arren of The Farthest Shore is one of the best heroes in any fantasy novel. A humble young man who *literally* goes to the end of the world and beyond. By the end of the book, in the wonderful scene where he lands on dragonback, exhausted and dirty, on the magical Isle of Roke, he has become a hero and a man and a king, helped to save the world, and fulfilled an ancient prophecy. A very beautiful book.
Le Guin's writing style, particularly in the Earthsea books, is quite dense and poetic, and it's not for everyone. But these are iconic fantasy books, which have been highly influential on other writers, filmmakers etc, and are worth reading almost on that basis alone.
If you're wanting to begin with the sci fi, you could try The Left Hand of Darkness or The Dispossessed or my personal fav The Telling, a wonderfully understated and beautiful book.
Although I'm obviously a massive Le Guin fan, I don't particularly like all of her books, and I personally wouldn't suggest reading the whole Hainish cycle. Good luck on your Le Guin journey. I hope you find something you like.


I tried to read Earthsea, but only a short story in one of those Dozois /Martin anthology. I was not hooked but maybe I should try the full length novel instead.

(I think the first paperback edition of "A Wizard of Earthsea" was in the Ace Science Fiction Special line, edited by Terry Carr, the original home of "The Left Hand of Darkness." The Bantam editions of the whole initial trilogy had great covers.)
The main consequence at the time was that you often had to look for the hardcovers in the children's sections of bookstores and libraries. There has, however, been a lingering tendency for critics to take them less seriously than they might.
In accordance with then-current (late 1960s to mid 1970s) publishing practices, which called for shorter books for their original market, none of them might be called a "full length novel" by current standards (especially post-Harry Potter).
They are long enough that I suspect that some old science fiction magazines would have called them "complete novels" on their covers. And in fact an abridged (if memory serves) "The Tombs of Atuan" did appear in a short-lived magazine ("Worlds of Fantasy") before book publication.


It was/is obvious that LeGuin was ahead of her time in some ways, and she’s a beautiful writer, but I just felt like there was way too much description of scenery in a book that length.
I’m sorry!. I can definitely see why people liked it- that one just wasn’t for me so I wanted to offer a second opinion.


I also quite often recommend A Wizard of Earthsea for those that prefer Fantasy, and while I adore it and get something more out of it with each rereading, it is not without its faults. It is one of her earliest works. The books in the 2nd have of the Earthsea series are much more mature and her concepts of how to present the world she built change significantly compared to the first 3 novels.

If you want something else by her try The Telling. It’s her last full length novel and quite beautiful.

If you want something else by her try The Telling. It’s her last full length novel and quite beautiful."
I've read the first 5 Earthsea, hoping to read Other Wind before the year's out. After reading several of her essays I now have my own copy of

Thanks for pointing me to The Telling I'll have a look.
