Litwit Lounge discussion
Lounge: OPEN, please come in...
>
What are you currently reading?
message 1651:
by
Reggia
(new)
Jun 04, 2022 08:34AM

reply
|
flag

I've never been a big fan of musicals, on the whole. (Of course, I'm tone deaf, so that's probably understandable!)

There are a select few (musicals) that I love, but this was NOT one of them. The half that I watched was painful! I was hoping to find an actual movie, but when doing online searches it keeps coming back to this same musical, arggh!



Yes --they both first appeared in 2005, but the book was based on the screenplay for the movie, not the other way around.

I'm not sure that it is actually rare --it was published by Harper, a pillar of Big Publishing, and my edition is a mass-market paperback, a format only used for large runs. Amazon carries the paperback. But it doesn't have a Kindle version, and it also would be rare in libraries. (Many librarians snidely turn up their noses at movie novelizations.)





But I got the details from there, and diligently filled out the "new edition" form on GR, with ISBN etc., downloaded the cover image to my files and uploaded it ... only to be told that the edition is already on the GR database! Here it is The Sense of an Ending.
But apart from all this, I'll be interested to know what you think. My friends rate it from 5 stars (quite a few) to one or two - with none in the middle!

I expect to finish the book early next week. At this point, I'm still not sure what my final rating will be.




That sounds like a good story!







Jean, I've just linked to my O Pioneers! review over on the "Share your book reviews" thread. :-)

I'm reading Aku-Aku: The Secret of Easter Island by Thor Heyerdahl at the moment, and finding it fascinating! Some of the author's theories have been questioned, but it's a remarkable account of discoveries in a then inaccessible remote place, which time has now changed forever.



While passing time last week in Harrisonburg, Virginia's public library, I started reading

Finally, I'm taking part in another group's just-starting group read of


I'm reading an early light novel by George Orwell, Coming Up for Air, and struggling with my review of Aku-Aku: The Secret of Easter Island. Maybe I should just stick at "good in parts", like the curate's egg!




Proust has been my lifeline.


The Prologue had me in stitches. Laughing so hard I had tears running down my face. First thought was so glad not to be reading this book in a quiet doctor's office.
Enjoyable.



Today, I'm adding The Talented Mr. Varg to my other current reads.
A third re-read, Werner? I need to bump this up on my list, too. :-)

Well, the third reread isn't actually a reflection of the story's quality in my estimation (though I do like it). It's just because I've never reviewed it here on Goodreads, and have always wanted to; but since I last read it nearly 25 years ago, I don't think my memory of it is sharp enough to do it justice without a reread, and it's short enough to reread relatively quickly. (Some books and stories I can review fairly even after 50 or 60 years, but this isn't one of those.)









I don't know this one, so am interested, but have to zoom in on your comment "it has serious content issues that the Le Guin book doesn't have". I'm hoping that you simply mean it has different serious content issues from A Wizard of Earthsea, but am not sure because you stress that A Wizard of Earthsea is a YA book. So I feel this might be a little unfairly dismissive.
Yes, A Wizard of Earthsea has always been presented as a book for younger people (as we know, YA is a recent publishers' concept) and can certainly be read on one level by older children. Ursula K. Le Guin herself said:
“Back then, in 1967 wizards were all, more or less, Merlin and Gandalf. Old men, peaked hats, white beards. But this was to be a book for young people. Well, Merlin and Gandalf must have been young once, right? And when they were young, when they were fool kids, how did they learn to be wizards? And there was my book.”
So I'm not disputing its original target audience. But it had developed into something else, even before its (equally amazing) sequels. I find it a profound and original book, with so much more than its top story. After all, we could just describe other great fantasy works with her words "Merlin and Gandalf. Old men, peaked hats, white beards" as she does. But we all know they are so much more.
In A Wizard of Earthsea we have the recurring theme of the presence of evil within good, a very difficult concept indeed. Plus all the references to known cultural and spiritual beliefs, such as the power of names, make for a very rich read indeed. And that's before we get into literary analysis such as the detailed worldbuilding and unusual casting of an antihero - both of which are exceptionally well done.
I'm sure you've read my detailed review, so won't go on about all this. I just felt I had to put in a word of defence. Ursula K. Le Guin was I believe the first to write a story about a young wizard, and despite the imitators, remains the best, in my opinion. Its ideas stay with you for many years, and only a true masterpiece can do that.

Yes, I did read your excellent (as usual!) review of the Le Guin book, and officially liked it. (I like it unofficially, too. :-) ) My own review (which is here: https://www.goodreads.com/review/show... ) recommended the book to fantasy genre fans of all ages; in my comment above, I mentioned that Adams' book was written for adults only to imply an explanation for why he apparently figured he could get away with including a lot of profanity and obscenity, not to suggest that YA books aren't "serious." (I read a lot of YA books myself, and often consider them far better written and more serious than much of the fiction churned out for adults these days, partly because YA authors often exhibit higher content standards.) I'd certainly agree that Le Guin's book has serious content; I didn't analyze the latter as deeply as you did, but did mention that "her messaging... is essentially moral, with strong encouragement of responsibility, loyalty, and concern for others." Hope this helps to clarifies my intent!

Oooh! I'm sorry, I completely misunderstood you, and to boot hadn't even considered that that might be what was wrong/what you disliked about the Adams book :( (I won't be reading that one, then.) I was a bit baffled about the different editions (re. the "expurgated form"), and now realise that you must edit it as you read aloud! I remember once I missed out an entire chunk of a novel I was reading aloud, because I disliked it so much. I explained that I wasn't enjoying this description of hunting - and a couple of youngsters came in and said they hadn't liked it either!
Yes, I'd spotted that you had read my review (and were one of the first, so it must have been a while ago) and I had read and enjoyed yours a couple of days ago when it was posted. That was partly what confused me.
Sorry again if I got over-defensive. I'm probably on heightened alert for people classifying books as "just kids' stories" when I judge that they are so much more :(
Books mentioned in this topic
Benito Cereno (other topics)Great Short Works of Herman Melville (other topics)
The House on Vesper Sands (other topics)
The Naming of the Birds (other topics)
Helsing: Demon Slayer (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Herman Melville (other topics)Liane Zane (other topics)
Francine Rivers (other topics)
Heather Day Gilbert (other topics)
Samuel Taylor Coleridge (other topics)
More...