Reading 1001 discussion

This topic is about
A Home at the End of the World
1001 book reviews
>
A Home at The End of the World- Michael Cunningham
date
newest »


5 stars.
Reason read: tbr takedown, Reading 1001
This was a book published in 1990 and is a story about two boys who are friends; Jonathan and Bobby. The setting is the 60s, 70s, and 80s. There is sex and drugs. Other characters are Alice, Jonathan's mother and Clare, Jonathan's friend. I can't say I was a fan because I don't like sexual details in books. The last part is the best part of the book. I thought the first part was the weakest. The Hours was a better book.
This was a book published in 1990 and is a story about two boys who are friends; Jonathan and Bobby. The setting is the 60s, 70s, and 80s. There is sex and drugs. Other characters are Alice, Jonathan's mother and Clare, Jonathan's friend. I can't say I was a fan because I don't like sexual details in books. The last part is the best part of the book. I thought the first part was the weakest. The Hours was a better book.


This is a coming-of-age story of two boys growing up in Cleveland, their attachment to one of their mothers, their growing apart and then coming together again, and how they form an unconventional family. I enjoyed the cultural references, particularly of music and movies, but I felt their stories rather remotely. I was not emotionally invested in any one character. I was also faintly annoyed by Cunningham's propensity to sling two adjectives that are not quite synonymns together to try to convey an unusual description. He used the technique too many times in my opinion.
This is an interesting take on the love triangle and the traditional ideas of family. It explores friendship, love and loss as well as acceptance, moving on and the changes a child can bring to the best laid plans.
Based on the description I wasn’t really expecting to enjoy this but I was pleasantly surprised and spent a happy six days in the company of Jonathon, Bobby, Clare and occasionally Alice.
I listened to the audio version of this and really enjoyed the change in readers for each character section.
This is a book about character rather than a fast paced plot and part of the joy of reading this is watching the characters grow and change.
Based on the description I wasn’t really expecting to enjoy this but I was pleasantly surprised and spent a happy six days in the company of Jonathon, Bobby, Clare and occasionally Alice.
I listened to the audio version of this and really enjoyed the change in readers for each character section.
This is a book about character rather than a fast paced plot and part of the joy of reading this is watching the characters grow and change.
I really like Michael Cunningham's prose, it is easy to read. I enjoy the multiple narrator aspect of the book, it's much more interesting. This book made me think especially answering all the discussion questions.

***
I feel that a more appropriate title for this novel should be "The Last of the Baby Boomers' Last Dream". While most of the action (and the writing) takes place in the late 80s with spotlights from topics getting traction in that era (e.g. beginning of LGBTQI+ acceptance, AIDS), the characters (except Jonathan's mum) are wedged into a loose cliched communal living arrangement that was seen as a trend in the late 60s. I was quite engaged in the novel until the focus shifted from Cleveland to New York; after that, my interest went downhill. I still don't get why the acronym AIDS was avoided completely in the text if the author's aim was to garner acceptance and understanding for the condition; its absence felt like reinforcing the prevailing taboo surrounding it.
I feel that a more appropriate title for this novel should be "The Last of the Baby Boomers' Last Dream". While most of the action (and the writing) takes place in the late 80s with spotlights from topics getting traction in that era (e.g. beginning of LGBTQI+ acceptance, AIDS), the characters (except Jonathan's mum) are wedged into a loose cliched communal living arrangement that was seen as a trend in the late 60s. I was quite engaged in the novel until the focus shifted from Cleveland to New York; after that, my interest went downhill. I still don't get why the acronym AIDS was avoided completely in the text if the author's aim was to garner acceptance and understanding for the condition; its absence felt like reinforcing the prevailing taboo surrounding it.
Fortunately, I loved the book as well. It follows the lives of adolescent friends Bobby and Jonathan who grow up in suburban Cleveland in the 70s. Bobby's family is afflicted by tragedy, and is largely taken in by Jonathan's. They experiment sexually and have an ambiguous but encompassing and beautiful relationship. Bobby befriends Jonathan's mom and learns baking and cooking from her- she smokes pot with them. There was just lots of ordinary but deeply heartwarming/wrenching stuff throughout the book.
Then it shifts to New York in the 80s. Jonathan is an openly gay writer, living with an older semi-eccentric woman named Clare who is his main emotional relationship, and who he has a baby pact with. Bobby becomes an interloper into their life, and a complex triumvirate of relationships spring up between the three. Eventually, they open a cafe in Woodstock and live as a three parent family to Bobby and Clare's biological child.
I won't spoil how it ends, but it does beautifully explore the idea of how do we define/how can we re-define family, how deeply even self-identified progressives can be secretly attached to traditional notions, and how we come to terms with mortality and the inevitable changes of life.
There's a line at the end that particularly stuck with me too, that Jonathan has about " not being something so simple as happy, but all at once present in his own life and all that entails". That really encapsulates these peak experiences where you're just aware of the simple and massive thing of being alive, and just having the strong complicated existential ache of it. This book itself really brought me there as well (naturally after that I gave it 5 stars).