Harry Potter discussion

100 views
Questions > the basilisk's tooth in hp2 wasn't supposed to destroy harry's hocruxe?

Comments Showing 1-4 of 4 (4 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Anastasia (new)

Anastasia (cityofmultiplefandoms) | 1 comments I mean they used those teeth to destroy other hocruxes. so at the second book when the basilisk bit him wasn't supposed to destroy his hocruxe too?


message 2: by Noah (new)

Noah | 5 comments Interesting thought. Maybe it was in the process of destroying it and Fawkes healed Harry as well as the piece of Voldemort inside him. ???


message 3: by Rachel (new)

Rachel Hyde (rachelwrites93) | 64 comments I think the idea was that if harry died, the horcrux that lived in him would die also.

Harry didn't die though, so the horcrux lived.


message 4: by Noah (new)

Noah | 5 comments That makes more sense. :)


back to top