Books in the Freezer discussion
FEBRUARY 2019- MONGRELS
>
Mongrels Chapters 13-18
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Stephanie
(new)
Jan 22, 2019 04:39PM

reply
|
flag


I always hate when I have "meh" opinions on book club books. While I didn't love it, I look forward to reading everyone else's opinions. I suspect Stephanie will enjoy this one more than I did.

I also kept remembering something Barbara Grizzutti Harrison wrote about writers “a magician can pull a rabbit out of a hat and get away with it; a writer's job is to tell us what the rabbit was doing in the hat in the first place.”
I hate to say it but I don’t think Mongrels did a good job of explaining what that rabbit was doing the hat. The narrator doesn’t get the payoff of finding his own way, he just gets the ending he’s been fantasizing about since he was a kid. The sudden explanation starting on about page 260 of the actual ‘rules’ of being a werewolf felt rushed. I really came to enjoy the ambiguity of the origin stories and the questions about everything the narrator hears (do werewolves really have such small bladders or is Darren just spinning a story etc.) Then, all of a sudden, it’s like, nope here’s the rules, here’s the get out of jail free card as it were so now you can be a werewolf without any of the negative consequences that have been discussed at length for the past two hundred pages.
Had we not had that middle portion where they trio road-trips around or had that been much shorter I would have nothing negative (or really ambiguous) to say about the story. But I just don’t see the point of it. To compare it to Head Full of Ghosts, which has a similar back-and-forth narrative structure where we switch between past and present POVs until the whole scope of the story becomes clear, there’s just a lot of loose threads in Mongrels that I don’t remember from HFoG. Or thinking about the Bone Mother which is almost like a story told in a widening spiral, where you get bits and pieces from all over the place until you finally understand the scope, again, I don’t see how/why all the bits of Mongrels fit.
I’m going on about this not because I disliked the book. I really enjoyed most of it, especially the writing style. I’m just frustrated that, to my mind, SGJ failed to stick the landing so in the end we got a very conventional finale to what I thought was an interestingly unconventional werewolf story.


I loved this book, but agree that the ending was the weakest part. I can picture this story coming from the imagination of a kid in a family like the narrator's; inventing a pretty cool story to explain why they were always moving, broke, and living on the outskirts of society. The end felt like Jones decided he had to wrap this up and maybe throw in some action to boot, and it seemed like a different world with a different logic to it. (view spoiler)
This was my second time through, first print, then audio. Appreciated it even more on the re-read.
I absolutely loved this book. I can see what people are saying about the ending though, I wonder how it would have gone if the werewolf aspect would've remained a more ambiguous aspect of the story. I liked the idea of Darren and Libby explaining away the more unsavory parts of their lifestyle away as "werewolf lore." It felt so human for a creature story, which was fantastic. I wasn't a huge fan of the Darren urine storyline either, but not so much that it detracted my enjoyment of the story, characters or writing. I think it's a new favorite for me


It was challenging looking at them from a day-to-day human perspective.
But you can’t help but get sucked in to whether or not the young man is in fact “one of them” His people. His pack.
In some ways your rooting for him to be one because he wants it so bad. On the other hand you kinda just want him to be ‘normal’.
The true essence of this story lies in its narration leading you to the last few moments of understanding where he truly belongs. Who or what he truly is.

I read this book as part of the Books in the Freezer Book Club. And, in all honesty, this is something that I would have never picked to read on my own. I'm not a huge creature-horror fan, but the book pleasantly surprised me.
In this, we have an unreliable teen narrator. He weaves together a non-linear story full of folklore, stories, rules and comedic tidbits. SGJ's writing has the ability to confuse but clear things up pages later. I had some issues with that, but once I got used to it I settled in and enjoyed the ride. The story is smartly written and unique in the way the story unfolds.
But the plot, or lack thereof, is where I had the biggest issue. I loved the first 2/3 of the book. And then I realized that the book really wasn't going anywhere. It was just story after familiar story. And once that light bulb went off I struggled a bit with the last 1/3 of the book. But overall this is a fun, enjoyable read. I've never read anything quite like it.
I would recommend to others that they check this out!

It sounds like we are similar types of readers.


Jones has said that he based a lot of the details on his own youth. I would bet that, if asked, he'd say the wine cooler consumption was based on a relative of his who resembled Darren. It's one of those quirky details that seems odd enough to come from real life.

