Support for Indie Authors discussion
Cover Workshop
>
Cover Help - Nonfiction / Things I've Learned As An Indie Author
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Dwayne, Head of Lettuce
(new)
Jan 17, 2019 10:22AM


reply
|
flag

M.L. wrote: "I like it, the colors, the font; the guy is totally focused in the midst of everything else."
Thank you, M.L. I looked over hundreds of photos of writers, typewriters, computers, and the like and wasn't getting a vibe from any of them. The instant I finally found this one, I knew if I bleached out the background it would make that writer pop.
Thank you, M.L. I looked over hundreds of photos of writers, typewriters, computers, and the like and wasn't getting a vibe from any of them. The instant I finally found this one, I knew if I bleached out the background it would make that writer pop.


I would definitively take it to, at least, read the blurb.


B.A. wrote: "I love it with the old fashioned type font."
I've been using the font in my draft, now. I love it.
I've been using the font in my draft, now. I love it.
Thanks everyone. I'm pretty happy with it and felt this one is going to get attention. Looks like everyone so far is drawn to it. Good.

It's an unusual and interesting cover ! Like ML has commented - the guy is totally focussed . Also , apart from his work material , the provision for his next meal is also right there beside him , so there'll be no disturbance / interruption from that quarter either !
Other than illustrating his focused mind , the hazy background could also represent ideas in the author's mind which are yet to come into full focus , and gain colours ! Or again , considering the title , could the indistinct background suggest the long journey from the manuscript to the market / reader ?
Would like to read the blurb , certainly !

Also, the image looks archival - almost historic but not quite. Maybe its the lamp post. I like it but is that intentional? The deep perspective works great against the flatter foreground.


Is it how I learned to be a independent author and put out professionally finished books?
Or is it my years of struggle?
What audience are you targeting - people who want to self publish themselves and want how-to texts, or autobiography readers?
Because if you are talking about how you learnt to really polish books and you too can do it, having smudged typewriter font for the title is sending the wrong message - makes me think of the hand-outs we used to get at school. For an autobiography it is amusing.
Thanks Carro.
It's tough to put into a few words exactly what the book is. The blurb will be a monster to tackle, when I get that far. (Right now the book is set aside until our beloved Supreme Overlord has a chance to look it over for me).
There is a little bit of autobiography in it, but probably less than five percent.
It is meant primarily for anyone who is thinking of self-publishing or who has just started to do so. Part of it is about putting out quality, polished work, but at the same time I'm encouraging writers to have fun with it and not take the hundreds of "rules" we encounter too seriously.
Most of what I learned about writing was learned many years ago, before Amazon existed. Hell, before the Internet existed. The font is meant to reflect this - an "old school" mind tackling this newfangled writing thing we call Indie. I'll dink around and see if I can find a font that is more fitting, though I'll admit I love this one.
It's tough to put into a few words exactly what the book is. The blurb will be a monster to tackle, when I get that far. (Right now the book is set aside until our beloved Supreme Overlord has a chance to look it over for me).
There is a little bit of autobiography in it, but probably less than five percent.
It is meant primarily for anyone who is thinking of self-publishing or who has just started to do so. Part of it is about putting out quality, polished work, but at the same time I'm encouraging writers to have fun with it and not take the hundreds of "rules" we encounter too seriously.
Most of what I learned about writing was learned many years ago, before Amazon existed. Hell, before the Internet existed. The font is meant to reflect this - an "old school" mind tackling this newfangled writing thing we call Indie. I'll dink around and see if I can find a font that is more fitting, though I'll admit I love this one.
D. wrote: "I love the font! Many of the great writers used typewriters."
Yes. Most of my literary heroes used typewriters or ink and pen. At one time, I did too, swearing I'd never get a computer.
Yes. Most of my literary heroes used typewriters or ink and pen. At one time, I did too, swearing I'd never get a computer.


That may be a little tricky, though I do agree it needs variation with the text. 'Character fonts' can look unprofessional if they aren't balanced with a strict font such as Arial.
Would reccomend playing around with balancing the text/font.



Yeah, definitely try that - I'm not keen on the alternating layers of font.
Like your name in the new font.

I do like it all in the Mom's Typewriter (name of that font) but the blue Ariel really pops. When I get time later tonight I'll try Carro's suggestion of "Indie Author" in Ariel.
I did do some checking around and many books similar to this one do have two fonts in the title and often two colors.
AND / OR I might do away with Mom's Typewriter on this book. I love it, but it might be better suited to another book I already have out that is in dire need of a better cover.
I did do some checking around and many books similar to this one do have two fonts in the title and often two colors.
AND / OR I might do away with Mom's Typewriter on this book. I love it, but it might be better suited to another book I already have out that is in dire need of a better cover.

I did do some ch..."
Not sure how I feel about mixing fonts and colours for the main title BUT the author name looks 1000x better.


Incidentally, behind your author name there is a rather hard edged darker grey band, not sure it is a good idea.
Emily wrote: "Character fonts' can look unprofessional if they aren't balanced with a strict font such as Arial..."
Regarding this, I've been looking at big house published book covers on my shelf and on Amazon and it is quite variable as to how they handle fancier fonts. Quite a few do have the same fancy font for title and author's name. Most of what is on my shelf is fantasy, sf and urban fantasy, so maybe it is more used in the genres, but it doesn't seem to be an absolute rule.


In the second version the blue font is nice and clear, modern, but almost (to me) says the guy in the image is really outdated, so how much did he really learn as an indie author, i.e., that his typewriter is way out of date but he still hasn't addressed the issue. It's leaning more toward a marketing approach but the image is holding it back. Also, the image doesn't pop as much (that red). It's a teeny bit (just a little) Dwight Swain-ish (a how-to) but not completely. (That oft-referred-to-in-the-past expert.)
If you do go with the blue, it's a good idea to try to all blue in the same font. The mixed fonts in this case seem to be at odds.
M.L. wrote: "It's a teeny bit (just a little) Dwight Swain-ish (a how-to) but not completely. (That oft-referred-to-in-the-past expert.) "
Yeah, we don't want that.
After looking over my various versions, I'll be going with the typewriter font for the title and the blue for my name. I think, overall, that does the best at getting across the nature of the book.
Thanks for your help everyone!
Yeah, we don't want that.
After looking over my various versions, I'll be going with the typewriter font for the title and the blue for my name. I think, overall, that does the best at getting across the nature of the book.
Thanks for your help everyone!