The Well-Educated Mind Histories discussion

This topic is about
The Social Contract
The Social Contract by Rousseau
>
End of the Year Wrap up with Rousseau
date
newest »


Sharon...I bet I didn't read the intro. I usually don't, only because Bauer suggests not reading any intro by anyone other than the author, until after we have read the book. This way we go into the work w/o knowing much about it. But I have a feeling it would help give some clarification afterward.

I’m aware of that and normally don’t read them, either. 😊 But when it’s a topic or author I don’t know anything at all about, I find it can be beneficial. In this case, it was mostly biographical information on Rousseau, which was interesting.
If your intro was biographical, then that's really helpful b/c it tells the reader a lot about why the author thinks the way he does. I found his autobiography, Confessions, extremely odd. He was a strange individual, and he lived a very uncommon life. Nonetheless, I still want to read his ideas on education...I think in Camile, or something like that. The man, who gave his five biological children to the state to raise b/c he believed he was unfit (obviously), also had a lot to say about the education of children.

I’m not counting it out completely, either - I believe he had some influence on the Transcendentalists, which I’m very interested in. But at the time I was trying to read it, it just wasn’t working for me.
Beth wrote: "Done! My review, way overdue:
https://www.goodreads.com/review/show..."
Thanks for sharing...I guess I will have to keep this in mind when reading the Federalist Papers, coming up soon.
https://www.goodreads.com/review/show..."
Thanks for sharing...I guess I will have to keep this in mind when reading the Federalist Papers, coming up soon.
It was a short read, but the topic was heavy enough, concerning the common problems with the masses and effective government . He seemed to be thinking out his ideas as he wrote them, and maybe at times he didn't think thoroughly enough; some of his ideas were contradictory. Or he had an immature understanding of human nature.
Whatever the case, he did not trust government. That's something I have to agree with.
Here is my review:
https://greatbookstudy.blogspot.com/2...