All About Books discussion
General Archive
>
Off-topic - which artists do you like?
message 151:
by
Leslie
(new)
Sep 18, 2014 02:20PM


reply
|
flag

The discussion of Paul and Greg over in 'What are you doing right now' just reminded me of the first painter I ever really liked: Albrecht Dürer
His self-portrait:

was hanging right over our couch and when I realized that painting for a living was a proper profession, I was at peace with the world, because that's what I did all day at the time (remarkably that never actually translated in any sort of talent of craft LOL) and somehow being adult for me was defined by the fact that you don't get to paint anymore but have to do 'proper' stuff. ;)
As I child I think I loved his animal drawings best, like this one:

How funny Jenny - I'm going to give away my ignorance now; I was only familiar with his engravings such as:

One of his engravings I saw in person was his fanciful engraving of a Rhino done based on a verbal description (http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/D%C3%B...) - I saw it as part of an art exhibit surrounding the Rhino in art and particularly Clara the Rhinoceros (who toured England in the 1700s and inflamed the popular imagination, including its artists).
From your post, I can see that his paintings and drawings were equally stunning!

One of his engravings I saw in person was his fanciful engraving of a Rhino done based on a verbal description (http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/D%C3%B...) - I saw it as part of an art exhibit surrounding the Rhino in art and particularly Clara the Rhinoceros (who toured England in the 1700s and inflamed the popular imagination, including its artists).
From your post, I can see that his paintings and drawings were equally stunning!


I don't know much about his life, just that - compared to other artists of his time - he seemed less inclined to scandal or madness. Apparently he was the first person to ever systematically 'sign' his paintings.
He always strikes me as really devoted to his work, though what I think is interesting is that whenever I read about him I have the feeling he treated it like craftsmanship more than art.

Greg wrote: "How funny Jenny - I'm going to give away my ignorance now; I was only familiar with his engravings such as:
One of his engravings I saw in person was his fanciful engraving of a Rhino done based..."
That engraving is the cover for an italian book by Leonardo Sciascia:The Day of the Owl - couldn't find it here!!!
One of his engravings I saw in person was his fanciful engraving of a Rhino done based..."
That engraving is the cover for an italian book by Leonardo Sciascia:The Day of the Owl - couldn't find it here!!!

http://dorsetscouser.com/stargazing/
The first in the sequence is just north of where I live, and there are pictures from all along the Dorset coast

And I always feel that closeup photos taken in Abbotsbury's floodlit gardens have an abstract quality not unlike some paintings.

One of his engravings I saw in person was his fanciful engraving of a Rhino done based..."
I saw those Durer engravings at the British Museum yesterday (and the porcelain reproduction of the Rhinoceros) - they were pretty impressive. Although the style isn't one I felt drawn to I found the craftsmanship masterly.
I don't really have a favourite artist as such, though I do particularly like the prints by Robert Gillmor, who I discovered as he creates the cover art for the New Naturalist books I collect:

Spine art by Robert Gillmor:

An interview with him on youtube:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CiI3P...


This painter was the one I had in mind when we were talking about Durer's attention to detail. "The Fairy Feller’s Master-Stroke" is in the Tate Gallery, in London. It is quite small, but incredibly precise and detailed. Surprisingly often, you find that reproductions of Richard Dadd's paintings are in fact details from this one.


Durer "Young Hare"

Dadd - a link to "Fairy Feller's Master-Stroke"
(I'm never sure how clear the images are when I post them direct.)

I agree! I like the owl Jenny posted as well.
@Jenny, regarding the Calder exhibit -- not yet! Dad & I are going next week. I did go to the sculpture garden near here a few weeks ago and took photos but haven't gotten them online yet. But here was my favorite


http://visualmelt.com/Edgar-Ende

My view? Sensible man, Will Gompertz. No, it isn't "what society was like" as the artist claims. I was there too!
Now take a look at this image, by Tom Wesselmann, from 1967 link is here. (It was originally called "Still life with Breast" but now has been renamed "Bedroom Tit Box"). Same time, same Art movement. I remember a current interview with the model. And no, SHE was not "objectified". But those models used by Allen Jones are. And ironically, it's even worse now. I have a feeling this exhibition will be very popular :/

I love a classic nude painting or statue; Dhanaraj share with us recently one called The Kiss which I adore. The female body can be shown to be so beautiful in the hands of the 'right' artist.

It annoys me intensely when people rewrite history like this. Society and Art was not all like that in 1967. I remember differently, and I was on my way to Art College, not heavily mascara'd and propping up a table ...

I like Andrew's theory behind the necessity of realism and getting lost in the action of the work like Tolstoy would. I'll have to do more research into their art.



http://www.ancientchina.org.uk/ming-t...
(pic: http://www.ancientchina.org.uk/wp-con...)
There were so many incredible artists shown there that are unrecorded, some of the silk scroll paintings of the period beggar belief and are so fine it's difficult to see how you could paint them. Also there was a jade belt which was carved into intricate multi-layered shapes that interwove and I have no idea how you would go about doing that!
Also the artistry in creating the red lacquerware bowls and tables - those were beautiful, such as this one created for the Yongle Emperor, which was amazing, it was absolutely stunning in person and the leaves just looked so real (albeit in red!):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TiHye...



Must one choose? Cannot one appreciate both? I personally think it is just as important to craft beautiful daily objects. Right now I am thinking abut the grill stands around the trees in Tokyo. they are beautiful and they are on the ground with dead leaves around them. i am thinking also of how in Prague the blocks of the pavements are put in beautiful patterns. That is art too. Particularly in Japan attention is made to enhancing the beauty of every aspect of life. I don't understand the Japanese fascination of hanging little plastic dolls from everything and purses with "Kitty" on them. you get what I mean...... This is all so un-Japanese. (I tend to prefer Japanese over Chinese art since they simplify; they know what to remove and only leave what has to be there.In my view....)
Another thing I think that is interesting is how both realistic and unrealistic art, BOTH can be tremendous. Art has to move you. There are many ways to do it. I cannot pick just one art style.I just read a bit about El Greco in Of Human Bondage and it got be thinking of the two approaches.

Hear hear! Art purists would probably say that craft is nice but art is about representing ideas… which I never really appreciate or understand as I'm far too uncultured to comprehend that aspect - I think of it as 'the waffly stuff'. ;-) Quite seriously though; when people start talking about art interpretation it really does my head in! It's the same with hidden meanings of literature - I don't really have a brain that can deal with those kinds of concepts, it just goes right over my head.
I know what you mean about everyday objects - sometimes those are the things that really make you stop and think.

Chrissie, I think a lot of literary criticism is useless because it ignores the essence of the book to play intellectual games & demonstrate prowess.
I think good literary criticsm, however, has the potential to open up new ways of experiencing a book - but only with critics that have enough intellectual honesty & emotional engagement to understand the heart of a book. When criticism ignores the heart of the book (the beating center) and only snatches at the periphery, it can produce nothing but dead flesh because the blood won't flow.
I think good literary criticsm, however, has the potential to open up new ways of experiencing a book - but only with critics that have enough intellectual honesty & emotional engagement to understand the heart of a book. When criticism ignores the heart of the book (the beating center) and only snatches at the periphery, it can produce nothing but dead flesh because the blood won't flow.

Actually, I do agree with you. Hate pseuds - love thinkers!

Here's some information about her:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K%C3%A4t...

One of my favourites is Remedios Varo, a Spanish painter who fled to France during the Spanish civil..."
I love Remedios Varos's painting too and also Leonora Carrington's work. Has anyone read Carington's novel The Hearing Trumpet?

That's amazing. Thank you for sharing it. I would love to see this one in person.
@Storyheart, yes!! I found The Hearing Trumpet extremely entertaining - the beginning especially was hilarious!
Gill wrote: "I saw my first drawings by Käthe Kollwitz this week. I found them incredibly moving.
Here's some information about her:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K%C3%A4t..."
I like her work a lot too Gill - very moving as you say, a perfect style for the subject matter.
Here's some information about her:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K%C3%A4t..."
I like her work a lot too Gill - very moving as you say, a perfect style for the subject matter.

Here's some information about her:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K%C3%A4t..."
I'd seen her war sculpture but that's all I really know about her. It's not work I particularly 'like' as such, but it's extremely powerful and difficult not to react emotionally to.
In the Christchurh Mansion at Ipswich they have a gallery of John Constable and Thomas Gainsborough paintings and they are showing Constable's painting of Salisbury Cathedral:
https://www.ipswich.gov.uk/content/co...
It was amazing to see, and it's huge - bigger than I expected. Quite something, though I still think I prefer some of his small observational paintings. In the same room they have his painting of the flower garden at Golding Constable's house. It's not an impressive painting, just a view from a window, but the skill and observation he shows in it are just remarkable. I spent an age just taking it all in:
http://www.artfund.org/supporting-mus...

link here
I haven't read The Hearing Trumpet but last month I read a very good book on her, Leonora Carrington: Surrealism, Alchemy and Art by Susan Aberth.
My review is here
Books mentioned in this topic
The Hearing Trumpet (other topics)Leonora Carrington: Surrealism, Alchemy and Art (other topics)
The Hearing Trumpet (other topics)
The Hearing Trumpet (other topics)
Of Human Bondage (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Käthe Kollwitz (other topics)Käthe Kollwitz (other topics)
Susan L. Aberth (other topics)
Käthe Kollwitz (other topics)
Käthe Kollwitz (other topics)
More...