The Great American Read discussion

This topic is about
War and Peace
War and Peace Q4 2018
>
War and Peace, Book 11 through Epilogues- Fall- SPOILER THREAD
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Bonnie
(new)
-
rated it 2 stars
Oct 12, 2018 08:11AM

reply
|
flag


I was surprised that this one battle made such a difference in him.

Such a disorganized war, and so useless.

Enemy officers/upper class actually seemed to have more in common that they did with their own men.

This is how I've seen people in their last days/on hospice too. Detached but not sad or scared.

Very young men heading into wars.

So true, of mother's I know who have lost a child.


I thought Andrei had the best inner dialogue of the whole book, especially in moments when he thought he was dying/was dying.
My favorite characters are Pierre and Maria and I wished they had gotten together. Pierre needs someone to steady him.
The big question is .... did Hélène kill herself or did she die from a botched abortion attempt? Tolstoy was really hard on her. As awful as she was, she didn't deserve to die like that. I'm not shedding any tears over her or her sleazy brother though.

I did not like Pierre at all. They did insinuate through the gossips anyway that Helene (who I liked OK) killed herself.
I kind of liked Sonya and Andrei, but not a whole lot.


"Only what's he going to Petersburg for!" Natasha said suddenly, and hastily answered herself: "No, no, it has to be so . . . Right, Marie? It has to be so . . . "
Natasha's initial reaction shows our need to ascribe reason to human behavior, while her ultimate "It has to be so . . . " suggests that such reasons are unknowable. An event occurs the way it does simply because it has to be so. This seemed to be Tolstoy's point about both wars and societal machinations.

I thought this part was surprising! It fits with the soap opera comparison everyone has been making...to me it was possibly the most soap operaish other than maybe the ultimate romantic pairings?

I thought Andrei had the best inner dialogue of the whole bo..."
I thought Petya's death was predictable, but still really sad. And like Bonnie said...his poor mother.
I don't know if I really liked any of the characters much. I occasionally sympathized with some, but I was never deeply invested. For a while, I liked Natasha's charm and zest for life, but then that seemed to be all she had going for her - where was her depth?

"Only what's he going to Petersburg for!" Natasha said suddenly, and hastily a..."
I didn't find any real deep meaning in this, but that makes sense, human behavior is often hard to understand or explain.

It was surprising and I'd say not in character for Ellen- but we only know her superficially.

I thought Andrei had the best inner dialo..."
yes, I don't really see much more to Natasha than Ellen or why Natasha was Tolstoy's ultimate heroine.


I thought Andrei had the best inner dialo..."
I agree. I don't see anything that special about Natalie. She was agreeable and nice, pretty.

Yep, I was glad I could say I read it too, but don't get why it's a classic and taught at Universities and such.
message 22:
by
aPriL does feral sometimes
(last edited Nov 26, 2018 02:37PM)
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars

This scene, Helene's possible suicide, is the single wrong note in the entire book for me.
For me, though, this novel is a five-star read, as it encompasses all of the adventures and intellectual thought of all of general Mankind, using educated aristocrats from Russia from 1805-1820, who represent symbolically everything that has ever been thought by people from the ancients until now. When I was in school and college, or at work, from the age of 14 till now (in my sixties), I heard like people like the ones in the book (middle-class office workers instead of aristocrats) speaking and arguing of many of the same things as the people in the book, everybody reflecting their own past experiences with that of others as well as bringing in what they could only imagine, or not, ideas gleaned from watching the news and listening to speeches and arguments. For me, it began with the Vietnam war, and returned again with the Iraq war, my ages of 16 and 40, respectively, my views a bit refined because of experience and maturity. Days and days of me and my friends earnestly argued and giving our opinions on how the wars should be conducted, why the war happened, why it should or should not be conducted. Some people angry at all of the politics and wanting to talk about their children, others more interested in partying and hooking up, some thinking we are fighting for God's glory, others thinking it was only for Big Oil, some blaming politics, others patriotic defense of Freedom/capitalism/democracy. I have been now through five or six wars and skirmishes with which America has been involved, and the conversations I have with my circle is distressingly similar to those in 'War and Peace' - distressing because such conversations are clearly never ending....damn it.

I surely didn't like it that much, but your reasoning about why many see it as a great book is insightful.
