Goodreads Librarians Group discussion

The Year's Best Science Fiction: Twenty-Fourth Annual Collection
This topic is about The Year's Best Science Fiction
Page Numbering Requests > page count correcton

Comments Showing 1-7 of 7 (7 new)    post a comment »
dateDown arrow    newest »

Timons Esaias | 68 comments My copy, which I believe is standard, has 784 regularly numbered pages, and xlvii intro pages. That doesn't add up to the listed total. Thanks.

message 2: by Alex (new)

Alex C. | 3 comments Please provide ISBN/ASIN for all page correction requests.

Timons Esaias | 68 comments ISBN:978-0-312-36334-5

message 4: by Alex (new)

Alex C. | 3 comments I'm not finding information on this edition (with the listed cover). Amazon has it listed as 704 pages (though with the green cover); the other editions (green cover) at 662 pages.

Would it be possible for you to post pictures of your edition that showed the publishing info and the last numbered page?

Timons Esaias | 68 comments Weird. Anyway, I apologize for my inexperience here, but I uploaded four pictures to the group (I didn't see any other method), named Brown 1, Brown 2, Brown 3, and Brown 4.
They are:
The cover and spine.
The copyright page.
The highest numbered Roman numeral page.
The highest numbered Arabic numeral page.
I apologize for the poor camera. And I assume we'll delete these pictures quickly, as they don't need to be taking up space here.

message 6: by Alex (last edited Jul 25, 2018 12:09AM) (new)

Alex C. | 3 comments Ok, the topic is listed for the book: The Year's Best Science Fiction with ISBN: 978-0-312-36334-5

Your initial post is listing your copy as having 784 regularly numbered pages, thus claiming an error in the 704 pages the book has as of now.

In your follow up, having uploaded pictures of your version of the book for confirmation, you are talking about a completely different book titled: T.E. Lawrence: The Selected Letters with ISBN: 0-393-02684-1

There is no concordance between your original post and the follow up. Additionally I see no error with the second book, the number of pages listed is correct (not counting the roman numerals). I don't believe a change is necessary.

That would be all on my end.

Timons Esaias | 68 comments Clearly, I'm a complete idiot, and I apologize. I'll post the correct pictures later, for whomever is interested.

Again, sorry to have wasted your time.

back to top