Di & D Reading Group discussion
Book 2: The Golem and the Jinni
>
Blame Nitsua
date
newest »



Okay: start on p.1. Let us know when you get to the end. Or don't. I'll survive.

Nitsua60 wrote: ""Nitsua can lead us through it. :)"
Okay: start on p.1. Let us know when you get to the end. Or don't. I'll survive."


Engineer27 wrote: "Up to chapter 3 and already getting into this work. Great stroke to give both protagonists insatiable curiosity. Although nominally fantasy, it takes on the typical POV of great science fiction, i...."

Cameron wrote: "Book should be arriving any day now, so I'll likely plow through it this weekend!"

Really enjoying the Djinni's backstory, though. The back-and-forth-ing between that and the late 19th century is the kind of flipping that might have made the last book somewhat more interesting.

Really enjoying the Djinni's backstory, ..."
It's definitely a slow burn. I'm still enjoying it, especially because it started to feel like things are happening, but that only happened about a third of the way into the book.

Not: "Magic? I never heard of magic, explain to me like I'm as old as I act right now..."
, but: "Oh, so magic is real. to what degree and in what form, mind you?".


I noticed that as well. I guess, go read the PHB on "Cold Iron".

John wrote: "I found it a fun read, a bit outside my normal reading sphere. Nothing too heavy.
Book one though?"

It is exploring human feelings, I needed that right now.
favorite line so far
(view spoiler)

But sweet steaming Gruumsh... the last third of the book got REALLY intense, REALLY fast. Wonderful stuff.

But goodness there's a lot of stuff keeping me from reading as much as I want right now.

I read it back when it came out; picked it up again Tuesday and am about 1/3 through.

Nitsua60 wrote: "Brian wrote: "How many of you have finished this one?"
I read it back when it came out; picked it up again Tuesday and am about 1/3 through."


So, just so you are aware, due to shifts in Scott's schedule for the week and the stuff going on with Dad, we had to record next week's show on Wednesday last week. And we screwed up....
We forgot to discuss the book. Which is okay because what with one thing and another I haven't actually finished the book yet. (shame on me).
So, with that said, how about we all have an extra week to read while I get all my ducks in a row and pretend I know what's going on?

+ I really like magical realism. As much as I like "pure" fantasy, it's also nice sometimes to have a story that has one or two fantastic elements in it and doesn't linger too long on them. Someone mentioned earlier that they liked Arbeely's fairly measured reaction to "oh, there's a person popped out of that flask," and I feel like that's kind of how the whole world Wecker created reacts to these two magical creatures. (If you, too, like magical realism I'd suggest Italo Calvino's work, even though it tends to be more fabulist than realistic.)
+ I feel alone a lot of the time, so I really appreciate a main/major character who is truly *alone*, reaching out and making tenuous connections. I (personally) don't need a full-blown novel of manners with endless social complexity: limiting the character palette to a half-dozen major and another half-dozen minor works well for me.
+ And I'm always a sucker for stories told in multiple timelines. Iain Pears' *Dream of Scipio* is a good one for this: three stories in the same location spread across provincial Gaul, medieval France, and WWII Resistance France.
+ I'm thankful Wecker put us in the time and the culture with plenty of unobtrusive details---clothing, the elevated dead-ending at 59th St., streetcars and errand-boys---rather than through verbal signifiers. Too many authors would have thrown ten Yiddish or Arabic words onto each page and called it "immersing the reader."

I loved that the people at the wedding drink araq. And how high-quality araq really does turn cloudy white when you put regular water in it.
There were a few minor misses, though.

Thought: The central theme of this book is whether you can act against your true nature? And, if you can't, should you take responsibility (or credit) for any of the outcomes?
Various characters find their own answers to this question, but the author does not seem to judge between them.
Other thought: The book was so sprawling and detailed, it didn't so much end as run out of story.

Thing is, with that thought, she's got a sequel coming out. Which I will not be reading. The book didn't offend me - I liked it, but it was kind of...vanilla-feeling. I just tend to have an unnecessarily antagonistic relationship with sequels that I think are wholly unnecessary. But I am likely wrong.
And totally rambling.
Mind that bus...