The Parlor PI's discussion
Death in Ecstasy, Part 3, Chap 18 to end with spoilers
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Mark Pghfan
(new)
Apr 28, 2018 06:45AM

reply
|
flag
A couple of thoughts on this section:
Things I liked--gathering everyone together and springing the solution (two of them actually). Also, the intricacy of the solution, which I have to admit, would have been very difficult to come up with on our own.
Things I didn't like: The characters were so stereotypical, and the language and idioms of the American, Mr. Ogden, were so bizarre. I also didn't see the point of introducing Claude and Lionel at all, much less making them effeminate.
What do you all think?
Things I liked--gathering everyone together and springing the solution (two of them actually). Also, the intricacy of the solution, which I have to admit, would have been very difficult to come up with on our own.
Things I didn't like: The characters were so stereotypical, and the language and idioms of the American, Mr. Ogden, were so bizarre. I also didn't see the point of introducing Claude and Lionel at all, much less making them effeminate.
What do you all think?

Claude and Lionel I think were there to increase the pool of suspects. They were a bit stereotypical but I think the author made them gay to explain why they were attracted to this alternative church as they would have been shunned by christian churches. Remember this book was written in 1936. I think we have to make some allowances for this.

I have to say that it did end satisfactorily. The clues were there and the motive made sense. And Alleyn did indeed diligently work his way to the conclusion.
I'm glad you liked it, Nicole and Anastasia. I am really fond of the classic, old-school British mysteries!
I'm glad you liked it, Nicole and Anastasia. I am really fond of the classic, old-school British mysteries!

NicoleG: I'm afraid Nigel the side kick doesn't appear in too many after this, but Inspector Fox does, if that is who you mean.