Page count correction, remove URL

[Halvor (Raknes)]

page count per my copy and WorldCat: 197 (ISBN 9788205459311)

Remove the url entry which does not meet the GR guideline requirements.

[Z-squared]

I changed the word count but did not remove the URL. It looked OK to me. What makes it not meet GR guidelines?

[Halvor (Raknes)]

It's simply a publisher's sales page for the book.

[rivka, Former Moderator]

Looks to me like it includes a preview of the book. Is that not what that is?

[Halvor (Raknes)]

It is. If that suffices, go for it, but I'm sure this is just a regular sales page that will be removed when the book goes out of print.

The same with this book/edition: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1...

[rivka, Former Moderator]

A preview counts as additional content, so the link is fine.

Like any link, if it becomes unusable, we can remove it.

[Halvor (Raknes)]

Since quotes from media reviews are inapplicable for book descriptions, I take this to mean that any sales page that contains such reviews is applicable to be linked from the URL field.

Is this a correct interpretation? If not, why not?

[rivka, Former Moderator]

If there is also other content (previews, notes from the author, maps or diagrams, etc.) then the presence of media reviews on an official author or publisher page for a book would not keep it from being an acceptable link.

[Halvor (Raknes)]

No no no… That's NOT what I asked you.

I asked whether media reviews alone was sufficient to make the page applicable to be linked in the URL field.

And if it isn't, why not?

[rivka, Former Moderator]

No, it's not. I just listed some examples of the sorts of things we consider additional content. Reviews from other sites would not be.

[Halvor (Raknes)]

OK.