2-3-4 Challenge Book Discussions #1 discussion
This topic is about
Murder on Washington Square
Murder on Washington Square
>
Question C
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Jonetta
(new)
-
rated it 4 stars
Apr 08, 2018 12:11PM
Mod
reply
|
flag
Yes he had to be because he is Mrs Ellsworth's son. She couldn't possibly be the mother of a murderer:)Though I was surprised when I discovered he was innocent of everything including a sexual relationship!
Mod
You know, I had no idea they used sponges back then. That was a revelation.
I didn't believe he was guilty for one second. He was just so sweet and naive.
Yes, I always believe he was innocent. I didn't think that author would break Mrs. Ellworth's heart like that, lol.
Yes, he was too naive to be guilty, and he was still so certain of Anna's honesty. (And, of course he was already the police's suspect from the beginning, so the culprit had to be someone else or there would be no mystery to solve :P)
I never thought Nelson was capable of killing anyone. He was so enamored of Anna, believing her BS story.
Jonetta wrote: "Oh, that was too funny that he hadn’t even had sex. I never believed he was guilty, not for a second, Mrs. Ellsworth or not. He was too...innocent:)You know, I had no idea they used sponges back ..."
Don't the Regency romances have lightskirts using sponges? Maybe I'm wrong....
Mod
I don’t read a lot of regency romance so I wouldn’t know. This is the first time I’ve seen a reference.
Charlene wrote: "Don't the Regency romances have lightskirts using sponges? Maybe I'm wrong.... ."Yes, they do when the story focuses on courtesans.
Frank's discomfort when discussing these things with Sarah makes me smile. As did Frank's reaction when Nelson told him about how Anna had gotten pregnant, lol.
Mod
I think its his Irish Catholic upbringing :)
