Accepted, this is not something, which should be said in isolation and abruptly, still, if people accept utilities of words beyond their mere literal meaning, compassionately allowing it to sink in with larger fruition, the idea said below can be source of larger wellness: “… humanity’s instinctive idiosyncrasies and innocent stupidities should not ideally be made the central and core feed-stock of art and creativity… especially, literatures should preferably be objectively realistic… the contemporary trend of fictions stretching much beyond psychotic virtualism and sadomasochistic ritualism is not desirable… a timely revival of good non-fiction readership also seems desirable…” This observation does not come out of any artistic egoism or inflated narcissism. Rather, they are words of innocent and lovable compassion… if people here discuss and debate it, the observation shall find more utility and fruition… … keep smiling…
“… humanity’s instinctive idiosyncrasies and innocent stupidities should not ideally be made the central and core feed-stock of art and creativity… especially, literatures should preferably be objectively realistic… the contemporary trend of fictions stretching much beyond psychotic virtualism and sadomasochistic ritualism is not desirable… a timely revival of good non-fiction readership also seems desirable…”
This observation does not come out of any artistic egoism or inflated narcissism. Rather, they are words of innocent and lovable compassion… if people here discuss and debate it, the observation shall find more utility and fruition…
… keep smiling…