YA Book Addicts discussion
Discussions & Debates
>
Series Vs Standalones
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Jordyn, Organizer Lieutenant
(new)
Jul 24, 2014 04:37PM

reply
|
flag

It really depends on the book like the fault in our stars was a stand alone but harry potter is a series and I love them both

I like all that you guys said about a series, but these days authors seem to think writing a series is "in" and so everyone is writing a series, even though their plot is too weak even when it's not stretched out through three books. There's a whole bunch of young adult dystopias that were written as a series just for the sake of it, when they could have been much better if they were just smushed into a standalone (The Selection, Matched (according to most reviews), The Chemical Garden (again, judging by reviews), etc.)
Also, standalones are very underrated in the dystopian writing world, but I guess series work the most for that genre. On the complete opposite, I don't think series work very well with contemporaries (there are exceptions, but they mostly don't).
Also, standalones are very underrated in the dystopian writing world, but I guess series work the most for that genre. On the complete opposite, I don't think series work very well with contemporaries (there are exceptions, but they mostly don't).
@ Amee you're right about that. The matched trilogy was a good standalone as was wither

There are definitely more standalones in romantic/contemporary genres. I feel like the trilogy has become overused in the dystopian world. Even fantasy books (which are often series) consist not just of trilogies, but of 4 or 5 or 6 books (I can think of series of all these lengths off the top of my head). However all dystopian series now have this plot: Protagonist and Love Interest (or 2) introduced and have a fun story that pulls you in. Then bad stuff happens and the Protagonist/Love Interest begin to fight against the system for more than just themselves. Lastly they fight the government and succeed (many times unrealistically) and then happy ever after (maybe insert some important/protagonist deaths in there for a 'wow' factor)
Yes it depends on the first book
Riya wrote: "Amee wrote: "I like all that you guys said about a series, but these days authors seem to think writing a series is "in" and so everyone is writing a series, even though their plot is too weak even..."
Haha exactly! Don't forget the fact that most of the time the plot is overshadowed by the romance (most likely insta-love).
Haha exactly! Don't forget the fact that most of the time the plot is overshadowed by the romance (most likely insta-love).

As far as stand alone novels go, I love a good story no matter how long or short it is. Sure, there are times when I finish a book and wish it was a series so that there would be more but that is what re-reads are for.


Ugh- Insta love is the WORST!
I know some series just shove it in your face

Yes I think romances should stick to stand alones
tbh, even in standalones there is insta-love. Believe me. I feel like it's not really the problem with the book's genre or format, but with the authors. You can develop a good romance while there is also a solid plot and make it work - but only if you're a good writer.
I really love series,, unless I have to wait longer than a day to read the sequel!..but I also love standalones cuz its immediate closure!..with series though you can get a more detailed story and more plot twists and adventure,,which is what I love:)

Yup that's the key, a good writer!

Yeah exactly in standalones authors are forced to fit loads of characterization where as series you get to see characters grow as change. I choose series (:



Alison- I feel the same way! Series you get to see characters grow and mature and you get this connection with them that by the end of a series you're heartbroken. But I like re-reading standalones! I wouldn't reread a series though.

With a series you get to see the characters grow and mature throughout it and you get to spend more time with them. That is an advantage to series.
But also with series for the most part the second and third and all of the rest in the series are never as good in comparison to the first book. Sometimes I've also found that in the first book nothing is as serious, but then with the rest of the books everything gets more intense and there is more drama, by the end of the series your favorite charecter is no longer who you felt they were before.
Like with the book Slide by Jill Hathaway, it was a great book, one of my favorite. But then when she added a second book the series wasnt as good in my opinion, my favorite charecter became someone who I disliked.
Standalone books are great reads but somtimes they leave you wanting another book because the first felt unfinished, it ended well but there was a few loose ends that should have been tied up. Or you are just in love with the charecters so much that you want their story to continue.
But sometimes, if the author is great they leave you with a single book that ends exactly how you wanted it, no loose ends, no frustration with the charecters, a perfect stand alone that you can read time, and time again.
So as a lover of both series and standalones, I think that both have advantages and disadvantages.