World, Writing, Wealth discussion
The Lounge: Chat. Relax. Unwind.
>
How practically fit is formal higher education?
date
newest »


As for me, I managed to get employment in chemical research, and have continued on. Even here, where I continued in the specialty, much of what I learned was irrelevant, although some, mainly the background theory, was useful. However, what it does is teach you how to teach yourself, i.e. how to learn, and that is invaluable.
I think for most jobs, what you need to know is specific to that job, so you have to learn on the job. But you must know how to learn, and it is helpful if you know how to communicate.

Felt precisely the same... An education gives tools rather than enabling to perform this or that specific activity/work.

On the other hand, we sometimes get interns from the state university equine management program. These are students want a career with horses but don't have a lot of practical experience. I believe only one has ever competed their internship. Most of them give up when they find out horse trainers work 7 days a week and a lot of hard work is involved.

Having said that, there are a lot of degrees with no firm job outcomes or opportunities.


Teachers, too...they seem to learn what they need in college. OTOH, if you're not teaching something like English Lit, I don't know what job definitely depends on you knowing English Lit (or History, or many other disciplines...)

Would indie author or goodreads reviewer fit? -:)
Some disciplines formally require an internship to master a profession.
Not so rare when a theory learnt in the uni has very little connection with what a graduate is required to do in his/her day-to-day work.
From your experience does education equals profession or not necessarily?