Goodreads Librarians Group discussion
Questions (not edit requests)
>
Which Calibre estimation is acceptable?
date
newest »


It is not an automatically installed part of Calibre, but it is a free plugin.
https://www.goodreads.com/help/show/2...
If the publisher does not provide a page number, you may estimate the page count using a tool such as Calibre's Count Pages plugin. Be sure to leave a librarian note that this is an estimate and that the page number should be changed if the publisher releases a specific page count.

But within that there are different methods to calculate the pages.
Automatically chosen was that APNX which gave 515 pages, trying Adobe Digital Editions (which looks common as I'll need ADE for DRM purposes) brings only 381 pages. (publisher gives 448 for HC, 461 for PB, Worldcat gives on the ebook page only a "published as "Die Schwester" HC 350 pages)
ebook in question e.g. https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/3...
As that is a quite huge difference I'd be curious if there is a method GR sees as best.



However, the only formats for which book-in-hand does not trump publisher/Amazon/etc. data are ebooks. User settings, precise model of ereader, and other variables can mean that the same book on your ereader and mine have different page counts. Therefore, for ebooks (including Kindle editions), the page number should come from the publisher.
The publisher does not have a page count listed. But they do have a word count, which I divided by 250 for an estimated page count of 241.
https://www.goodreads.com/topic/show/...
I believe when that note was added to the Manual, the plugin only had one method -- not 3. It sounds like the current ADE method may be the closest to what used to be the only option.
Keep in mind that using the Calibre plugin or the word count method should only ever be done when there is no way to get the real (publisher) count, and the change note (and/or a Librarian Note) should clearly state that it is an estimate via (whatever method used) and that if the real count becomes available from the publisher, it should be added instead.
Keep in mind that using the Calibre plugin or the word count method should only ever be done when there is no way to get the real (publisher) count, and the change note (and/or a Librarian Note) should clearly state that it is an estimate via (whatever method used) and that if the real count becomes available from the publisher, it should be added instead.

Keep in mind..."
Oh yes I will :)
I'd like to have a non estimated pagecount instead of the Calibre one - so I'd really happily change it if it once is available.
and as official libraries are ok for data, would my library be ok for the ebook pages? They do sometimes list some - and even for the above mentioned book http://www4.onleihe.de/thuebibnet/fro...
(listed there as "Umfang: 314 S." which means 314 pages)
(I assume they don't count as they are not the publisher but was worth the try ...)
But no problem if the library is not ok, I can stick with the ADE Calibre count in cases nothing else is available (could have thought of that years earlier as I'm using Calibre for ages).
German ebooks are often missing in the database, so lots to do there by going through my reader :)
Thanks a lot for the info rivka.
And ADE makes sense as ebooks here mostly use that if they are DRM protected epubs.
A library is not a publisher, and when the publisher count is available it should always take priority for an ebook. But I see no reason a library's estimate should be any worse than Calibre's or the word count method -- again, with a note, and replacing if the publisher's becomes available.

This is wonderful news. I do see ebooks without page numbers and have no publisher count for them. Thank you!
But which way of counting the pages is the correct one?
Saw it might make huge differences in which preinstalled one I choose.
There are "paragraphs APNX (exactly)", "Adobe Digital Editions" and "Calibre ebook viewer" as choices.
(don't even know what APNX means)
Is there a way GR prefers?
(yes I know to mention it in note then but the help topic doesn't mention the prefered counting method)