Reading the Detectives discussion
Group Challenges
>
2018 Challenge - Ngaio Marsh
message 51:
by
Susan
(new)
Jan 29, 2018 01:01AM

reply
|
flag

Yeah I'm afraid I am to, I hate reading out of order whether it is a serial or a series. Hey just my quirk 😳
Good to hear I am not alone, Adrian! I know I annoy people sometimes when they suggest a book and I demur if it is part of a series. If they knew how painful it is for me to read out of order they would understand :)

Exactly !!!


Another point is the way an author matures. When I was jumping around in a series I would look at an earlier book and wonder how the author suddenly became a lesser writer. They hadn't become lesser, their writing just hadn't matured yet.
So now I try to read in order and begin at the beginning.
I feel we need to start a movement - Books in Order? Series Matter? Shall I get a banner and Jan C can print the T-Shirts? ;)

So I want one of this Tshirt ^^
However, my mother has kind of another rule. Well it's not really a rule, it's more something that happened because she read what was at her disposal then, but she often started with book 2. Then she is intrigued by the cahracters dynamics and all, and read book 1, and then back in order : 3, ... Have you ever done that ?
As the first book in a series is often weak, there is some kind of sense with that, Elinor. Not that I have done it, or only by accident.


The first one is Crocodile on the Sandbank. I'm thoroughly enjoying being back in her world!

That is another series I have to read but haven't got to yet.



Medium please 😀
Roman Clodia wrote: "...I would maintain order doesn't really matter..... that said, I appreciate other people have a different approach to this than me! "
T'would be very boring if we were all alike 😬

Yes I'd agree with that RC - good point.

Oh you should definitely have a go then, they are quite quick and easy to read and I like the feisty Amelia and the scrapes she gets into!
I'm another Amelia Peabody fan! Just love the family. I haven't yet had the courage to try the recent addition, written (or completed) by a different author. The mystery is usually a bit convoluted but the characters more than make up for it.


Sorry to hear you had such a long wait, Jessica, but it's good to hear you are joining in. I hope you enjoy discovering Marsh!
The good thing is that the books are fairly short, so you should catch up quite quickly, Jessica :)
Found a couple of Marsh books in an Oxfam shop today, Overture to Death and Surfeit of Lampreys - my mum had already lent me several, so I now have most of our remaining reads ready to go. :)
Now that we are a few months into this challenge, what is your response to Ngaio Marsh? How do you think she compares to our previous challenges - Dorothy L. Sayers and Miss Marple?

Concerning the challenge in itself, I knew I wasn't going to read a lot of the books (especially since the last months I've been reading few things except comics), but I still hope I can finish the 2nd one and maybe read the 3rd one as well.
I enjoy Georgette Heyer's mysteries too, Elinor. I have this group to thank for introducing them to me.

I had read a lot of these two authors before and although I have had the Marsh books for a good number of years, I hadn't got to them . Mainly because of the small print of the old paperbacks, so I needed something to push me into reading them. This group has given me that push, and I'm really pleased it has.

Great to hear some of us have discovered a 'new' author. It is interesting to read someone whose work I know less well.

Later on I read one of the books again and found it much more appealing, so went on to read most of the series. I found them again when I began working in our local public library shelving the returns, and read many again. I have enjoyed them more with each reading yet haven't remembered the details of the murder. Whether that is because I adjusted to/came to like her style, or because I matured/aged. :)
I often forget details of who murdered who, and why, in mysteries. I tell myself it is because I read so many - it makes me feel better about my poor memory, Lesley :)
It’s early days, but I’m wondering if she may be the best of the big four in some ways, because of the combination of strong characters plots and writing style. Looking forward to watching Fox and Alleyn develop as we read on.
All of the Big Four are very different, really. I wonder who would be the greatest of the male UK GA authors? Who would be the contenders, do we think?

Probably 95% of them would turn out to be John Creasey
That's quite a question, Susan - there are so many! There are lots I haven't read, but out of those I have I think Edmund Crispin, Nicholas Blake and Michael Innes are all great - and I have only read a couple so far by Freeman Wills Crofts, but I think he is very good too.
Of course, from an earlier era, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle is the greatest of them all.
Of course, from an earlier era, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle is the greatest of them all.
Rosina wrote: "Probably 95% of them would turn out to be John Creasey..."
Haha, he did have quite a few pseudonyms! I have one or two books by him on my Kindle, but haven't got round to them yet.
Haha, he did have quite a few pseudonyms! I have one or two books by him on my Kindle, but haven't got round to them yet.



I really enjoyed reading these books in a group. It helped me see things that I would otherwise have missed, whether that was plot points or character traits. This was my first experience of doing that - never having been in any kind of book club before. However, I didn't enjoy her writing as much as I'd hoped. I read the first four, then started the fifth and sixth because I had a combined copy which contained all three stories. I didn't finish either of those two and probably won't read any more.
I found Alleyn quite irritating at times, with his flippant attitude. Also there were too many phrases that meant nothing to me, perhaps because they were cultural references that no longer have meaning. I wonder if that's partly why she is less well known today than Agatha Christie. AC's books seem relevant and fresh today even though they are from the same period.
I'm really glad I joined in the challenge though, and will watch out for the next one!
I think a few of us have mentioned that Agatha Christie has 'travelled better,' as it were. She seems remarkably ageless in terms of plots and character. I think she stayed away from much of the current slang and also her motives are quite believable and don't often stray far from money, jealousy and love.


Which could be considered the ageless, perennial human traits.

Having played catch-up to a small extent on the Ngaio Marsh challenge, I have to agree with Susan that Christie has travelled better and in my opinion IS better.
For the male "Big 4" if we can include relatively modern authors, I'd go for Colin Dexter. I just love Morse (old and new when it comes to TV).
Lots of contenders for male writers (my own faves would have to be Nicholas Blake and Edmund Crispin, from the GA era). Apart from Conan Doyle, though, there is no real central definite, as there is with Christie. I think we are just lucky that, every now and then, a really special author - male or female - comes along and changes everything.
Books mentioned in this topic
Picture Miss Seeton (other topics)The Penguin Pool Murder (other topics)
The Lost Taonga (other topics)
The Easter Make Believers (other topics)
The Only Secret Left to Keep (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Heron Carvic (other topics)Colin Dexter (other topics)
John Creasey (other topics)
Youngman Carter (other topics)
Mike Ripley (other topics)
More...