RWBY discussion
Salutations!
>
Mod-Chat
message 51:
by
Xena1016
(new)
Dec 14, 2017 02:15PM
Mod
reply
|
flag
message 52:
by
Pixie_Sky -- please check bio for explanation on why I am not on
(new)
message 55:
by
Pixie_Sky -- please check bio for explanation on why I am not on
(new)
message 56:
by
Pixie_Sky -- please check bio for explanation on why I am not on
(new)
message 60:
by
Pixie_Sky -- please check bio for explanation on why I am not on
(new)
I think we should put up a collab request if people are going to try to make team names, unless you're being the entire team,.
I didn't really have any plans for them to be honest.
I could fill out sheets for them later....or have the raffled off?
I could fill out sheets for them later....or have the raffled off?
question: should we make some more ground rules for the characters? or should we leave it at the color name rule?
Alright. Gonna sleep. Might not be on till sun as I’m driving home today and have stuff to do sat
I was wondering if we should put some kind of limitation on semblances, and what not, but i'm not sure exactly how to do it.
And Yeah, I had a bunch of idea's for team GREY, with appearances, and semblances, but I didn't get far in terms of character traits and personalities.. . .
And Yeah, I had a bunch of idea's for team GREY, with appearances, and semblances, but I didn't get far in terms of character traits and personalities.. . .
message 72:
by
Pixie_Sky -- please check bio for explanation on why I am not on
(new)
Limitations on semblances? As long as they are not over powered, shouldn’t anything be fine? Even if they dont help in battle. Though, we might have to watch out for them and read them more carefully when more people join.
Yeah. We just need to watch for op stuff or make sure people don’t try to have more than one semblance
that was what I was talking about. . . but there isn't much in the name of rules we could make....
message 75:
by
Pixie_Sky -- please check bio for explanation on why I am not on
(new)
That is true... i think we covered all of the main ones that need to be in place. As the group grows and we encounter new things, it is fine to add on rules to make it a better place. So in my mind, as of right now we are fine.
message 77:
by
Pixie_Sky -- please check bio for explanation on why I am not on
(new)
ok!
And---I had a thought: since we are more or less playing around in the "before the show" time should we have like a. . ban on playing other main characters?
And---I had a thought: since we are more or less playing around in the "before the show" time should we have like a. . ban on playing other main characters?
message 79:
by
Pixie_Sky -- please check bio for explanation on why I am not on
(new)
Like say...
Created characters can't interact with team RWBY or their classmates, because they aren't really around at the time.
Or they can't have history's with those characters, because it wouldn't make any sense.
My idea was, they would be able to interact with the staff of the academy's and the headmasters (Ozpin, Ironwood, Port, Glynda, Oobleck ect.) Or maybe adult characters, like Qrow or Tai.
But not Ruby, Juane, Ren, or ect.
Created characters can't interact with team RWBY or their classmates, because they aren't really around at the time.
Or they can't have history's with those characters, because it wouldn't make any sense.
My idea was, they would be able to interact with the staff of the academy's and the headmasters (Ozpin, Ironwood, Port, Glynda, Oobleck ect.) Or maybe adult characters, like Qrow or Tai.
But not Ruby, Juane, Ren, or ect.
message 81:
by
Pixie_Sky -- please check bio for explanation on why I am not on
(new)
message 83:
by
Pixie_Sky -- please check bio for explanation on why I am not on
(new)
message 86:
by
Pixie_Sky -- please check bio for explanation on why I am not on
(new)
message 88:
by
Pixie_Sky -- please check bio for explanation on why I am not on
(new)
message 90:
by
Pixie_Sky -- please check bio for explanation on why I am not on
(new)
So this thing with the character, with that semblance, that we're worried about . . .
I was thinking, we let 'em RP and see if he makes the character OP.
I was thinking, we let 'em RP and see if he makes the character OP.
message 93:
by
Pixie_Sky -- please check bio for explanation on why I am not on
(new)
message 94:
by
Pixie_Sky -- please check bio for explanation on why I am not on
(new)
I only really had a problem with the emporer. Just make it to where you don't auto lose for refusing to participate in it.
message 97:
by
Pixie_Sky -- please check bio for explanation on why I am not on
(new)
message 99:
by
Pixie_Sky -- please check bio for explanation on why I am not on
(new)
message 100:
by
Pixie_Sky -- please check bio for explanation on why I am not on
(new)
can we make a rule about getting rid of the under construction sign if they are finished? this might be a personal thing, but i can't seem to figure out if a character is finished or not and my brain will ignore any with the under construction post if it is not completed. if we can't make a rule, how about a character workshop where they can post their unfinished characters and then put their characters under completed to wait for them to be approved?




