Stephen King Fans discussion
The Random - Discussion Threads
>
Analyzing Stephen King Characters
date
newest »



In my mind, Tommy went out with Carrie because Sue wanted him to. He was indifferent... probably didn't like her. Then as he got to know her and looked past the ugly clothing, etc he saw that she was actually pretty... even beautiful. He started to like her a lot. I think if Tommy had survived the humiliation he would have been heartbroken for Carrie, would have stood up for her, might have intercepted and deflected her anger. It was almost too easy to take him out of the equation from the very start. It would have created a more difficult problem for King, but maybe a more complex resolution. BTW, this belongs on the Carrie thread. I'm going to past it there too.

Carrie was assaulted with tampons in the shower, and, in the end, she gets pig's blood dumped on her at the prom. Somewhere amidst of all this abuse, Carrie realizes she's telekinetic. Seriously, us guys have known idea what getting your period for the first time is like, which can be traumatizing enough, and on top of that, Carrie gets ridiculed for it. My daughters would say that would make anyone go a little loco.
Also, Carrie doesn't fit in for a variety of reasons. Most of them, though, are a result of her mother's awful treatment of her. She dresses frumpy (she wears a girdle, ugh) and is socially awkward to the extreme.
Now for Harold Emery Lauder; Harold’s strongest emotion toward Stu is jealousy, which as we all knows is the root of all-evil. His personality doesn’t win Fran over, either; he reacts rather casually to the death of his own parents. When Frannie leaves the scene where they meet, “she knew Harold would be watching her jiggling buttocks, storing up the footage for whatever X-rated movie played constantly in his head, and that made her angrier, sadder, and more weepy than ever” (Uncut Version 242). Thus, why should anyone feel empathy towards this character…which his behavior is consistent with a serial killer; Ted Bundy.

Does anyone else think she is a very, very flawed character?

Now moving forward….Although, Susan was going alone to the Marsten House to prove to Ben and Matt that vampires do not exist. She also brought a picket and a gold crucifix “just in case” even though she did not believe in it, which provides evidence she is intelligent and may secretly believe that they may be correct.
Now as far as Ben Mears goes, he is an author just like S.K, which I believe that provides evidence that Big Ben is cool and exotic, which Susan is totally attracted to, like a magnet… So a little of egocentricities in the story…
Now here is the irony of the whole thing… Susan rejected her mom with small town values, and so she ends up a fallen victim to the vampire, which can also be seen as the victory of her dear old mom with those small-town values. They suck out all of the life with her ambitions and hopes and leaves her dead-in-life; in the same old town, the one that she hoped to leave someday with her true love Ben Mears; A.K.A…S.K in the flesh…….

Damn... I'm glad we'll be reading Salam's Lot soon because I guess Susan needs to be revisited. I've been in love with her for years.


Yes she is a flawed character, but in books as in life no one is perfect, they all have there flaws and I say thank god for that. Give me characters that are greedy needy and just a bit seedy.
Sure, you can say Harold should have "grown up", but his parents practically ignored him and focused their attention on..."
Most people feel sorry for Carrie White, because she was brought up in a highly or should I say an overly religious household, certain important information was withheld from her.
They were raised and taught in different times. What was considered normal when Carrie went to school was quite different from when Harold went to school. Carrie