Argue for Inspiration discussion

6 views
Silly/Random Arguments > If a Tree Falls in a Forest and Nobody is Around to Hear it, Does it Really Make a Sound?

Comments Showing 1-31 of 31 (31 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by CJ (new)

CJ | 89 comments Mod
This question is actually pretty deep.


message 2: by CJ (new)

CJ | 89 comments Mod
It all really depends on how you define sound. I personally don't think it does.


message 3: by Za-za (new)

Za-za Ooh, I'm gonna spice things up a bit and say yes. Yes, it does make a sound. Let me warn you, I am totally prepared for this argument...


message 4: by CJ (new)

CJ | 89 comments Mod
No it doesn't! :P


message 5: by Za-za (new)

Za-za Lies! Lies, CJ! XD


message 6: by CJ (new)

CJ | 89 comments Mod
It makes no sound! I cannot be swayed!


message 7: by mels (new)

mels (padmeskywalkers) It makes a sound!


message 8: by Za-za (new)

Za-za Okay, so the textbook definition of sound is: when vibrations travel through a medium (ex. air). Loudness is the human perception of sound. (Oh my goodness, I sound like such a geek... Oh wait, I am one.) Therefor, even if we can't hear it, that doesn't mean it didn't happen, unless, of course, the tree was somehow in space, which is impossible. Furthermore, an animal or another human being could have heard it or something. For example, we don't always see crime happen, but we know that it does because someone else told us.


message 9: by Za-za (new)

Za-za A lot of things no one sees still happen.


message 10: by mels (new)

mels (padmeskywalkers) Exactly! But it still happened.


message 11: by Za-za (new)

Za-za Yes, but it happened. The question isn't asking if we know that it happened... It's asking if sound was made, and scientifically speaking, sound was, indeed made.


message 12: by CJ (new)

CJ | 89 comments Mod
But sound is only vibrations if nothing is there to hear it.


message 13: by Za-za (new)

Za-za There could have been a squirrel or something to hear it. XD


message 14: by Za-za (new)

Za-za ((I literally LOLed at that! X'D))

But it still happened


message 15: by CJ (new)

CJ | 89 comments Mod
Does a squirrel have a body, Za-za?


message 16: by Za-za (last edited Jul 02, 2014 07:15PM) (new)

Za-za CJ wrote: "Does a squirrel have a body, Za-za?"

Shush.

But... I guess it does... (?)


message 17: by CJ (new)

CJ | 89 comments Mod
Dictionary definition of body:

"a person's or animal's whole physical self"

A squirrel has a body.

Nobody is around to hear it.

No squirrels.


message 18: by Za-za (new)

Za-za Haha, so no squirrels, but there was still sound.


message 19: by CJ (new)

CJ | 89 comments Mod
There were vibrations, yes. But sound is the way we humans describe the vibrations when they come in contact with us.


message 20: by Za-za (new)

Za-za No, the vibrations occurred, so therefor, there was sound. Eventually, the vibrations reached us... we just didn't hear them (there are a lot of vibrations we don't hear).


message 21: by CJ (new)

CJ | 89 comments Mod
Your point?


message 22: by Za-za (new)

Za-za Haha, this is so intense. Vibrations we can't hear are sound. We can't hear the vibration from the tree, but there was sound. It is classified as sound.


message 23: by CJ (new)

CJ | 89 comments Mod
...What idiot classifies something with no sound as having sound???


message 24: by Za-za (new)

Za-za No, we classify sound as loudness, which is only our perception. Do you waves from your cell phone when you send a text? No.


message 25: by CJ (new)

CJ | 89 comments Mod
Well, that tree had no loudness because there was no perception.


message 26: by Za-za (new)

Za-za True. But there was sound.


message 27: by CJ (new)

CJ | 89 comments Mod
Nope.


message 28: by Za-za (new)

Za-za
Yes. You cannot argue with Tom Hiddleston.


message 29: by CJ (new)

CJ | 89 comments Mod
Za-za wrote: "
Yes. You cannot argue with Tom Hiddleston."





message 30: by Za-za (new)

Za-za



message 31: by CJ (new)

CJ | 89 comments Mod



back to top