Crime, Mysteries & Thrillers discussion
Archive - General
>
Q&A with Karin Slaughter from Random House
message 1:
by
Christine
(new)
Jul 01, 2014 05:44AM

reply
|
flag
















Q: How are you able to paint such a vivid, creepy picture with so few words? I’m thinking about John’s experiences in prison. You were incredibly economical with the words used to describe it but there was no mistaking your meaning. That made it more personal and palpable for the reader. I literally shuddered while reading all he endured!



I love your characters in all of your books, even the ones I don't like.
I guess I have two questions. In Triptych you introduced us to Angie, Will and a character John Shelley. I kind of felt that Angie and John made some kind of connection in this book...is there a chance you might bring this character back for a visit?
My second question how far in advance did you know you were going to bring Will and Sara together?
By the way, I am loving Cop Town! You certainly hit it right with the attitudes towards women and the feelings in south for that time period!









I knew when I wrote Faithless that Will and Sara were going to meet. I saw that Sara was getting too happy in her life, and while you guys think you want to read about happy people, you really don't. They get kind of boring. Even Maeve Binchey had folks start off miserable before they got happy.
As to the last part of your post, I feel the need to say that it wasn't just in the south that women were treated this way. It was all over the country. Fair housing laws weren't in place. Women couldn't get credit cards and home loans-not just in Atlanta, but in New York City. I't wasn't until (I think) 1972 that unmarried women were "allowed" to legally obtain the pill. They had to have a man's permission first. We've come a long circle, baby!

Agreed! lol"
I feel that authors who resort to writing lots of sex into their books do so because they aren't good enough writers to think of something original to say. Sex is unoriginal.



No, Karin, please see my comment. Lots of sex in a book is a bad sign. Pease don't resort to that

As for fact vs fiction: the stuff that happens to the women in Cop Town is what happened to a lot of women back then. The feces in the locker, the various DNA samples in their purses and squad cars, the groping, the ill-fitting uniforms...that was all true, and they all put up with it and did their jobs anyway.
The sad thing is I just read a story this morning about women in science, and how statistically unlikely it is for them to achieve tenure as opposed to their male counterparts, and one of the women said (I am recalling this from memory) that she was told that her ponytail was too floppy for her to be doing cancer research in a lab. I mean...come on.

My question: We have so much technology now. Is it difficult going back to a recent time, yet one where there aren't cell phones, internet, and other tools that would be so handy for investigators? It really seems to me that you've done some research on what was and was not available.