DIVERGENT FAN CLUB discussion

187 views
Welcome :D > How do you feel about Allegaint being put into 2 movie?

Comments Showing 51-85 of 85 (85 new)    post a comment »
« previous 1 2 next »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 51: by Joshua (new)

Joshua (fignewto) | 56 comments @G.d speaks the truth.

Making Allegiant into two movies is nothing but a cash grab. There's no reason to make it so otherwise, because if Insurgent, the most action packed book of the series, isn't two parts, why make the most drawn out book of the series into two parts? Money. Moolah. Simoleons

Harry Potter made a bit of sense. Mockingjay certainly doesn't, and neither does making the Hobbit into three movies when the book is shorter than any of the Lord of the Rings books. Splitting Allegiant is cleary a mistake.


message 52: by [deleted user] (new)

I think it would make more sense if Insurgent was split into 2 parts because it has the most action. Allegiant barely has no action until {WARNING ALLEGIANT SPOILERS!} Tris dies.
{SPOILER ENDS}. But it's all about the money.


message 53: by Becca (new)

Becca (someonewhoreads123) I hate it when movie companies split the last movie into two movies just to make more money. If they split Allegiant into two movies like they are doing with Mockingjay I will be so ticked.


message 54: by Renée (new)

Renée Muñoz (reneebriannemunoz) | 21 comments I agree with @Sr_xo28
the second movie should be two. that way they wont miss anything good.


message 55: by [deleted user] (new)

@Rebecca
They are obviously going to split Allegiant into two parts. I mean look at Twilight and Harry Potter and Hunger Games. They do that with every last movie/book adaptation.


message 56: by Abby (new)

Abby | 10 comments I get why they do it but I am also happy because SPOILER ALERT


It puts off tris's death


message 57: by Gabbers (new)

Gabbers I don't know cause I liked the book, but I didn't think it had that many details, so I don't think it needs to be TWO movies.


message 58: by Acacia (new)

Acacia | 21 comments I think it's cool because then you would go slow to the finish.


message 59: by ➳Halina➳ (new)

➳Halina➳ Renée wrote: "I agree with @Sr_xo28
the second movie should be two. that way they wont miss anything good."


That's a really good idea!


message 60: by Reem (new)

Reem Dashti | 15 comments I think it's unnecessary cuz it's not that big of a book i think if would all fit in 1 movie.. But i wouldn't mind seeing Theo James' face as Tobias so why not? Lol but really i mean for example Harry Potter, DH being made into 2 movies was good cuz the book has many things But no for Allegiant i dont think it's needed


message 61: by Reem (new)

Reem Dashti | 15 comments @Sr_xo28 Harry Potter started the Parts trend lol but to me DH needed the parts cuz it was detailed but i dont think THG and Divergent need that cuz both books werent so detailed and long so i think they would fit into 1 movie ( idk about Twilight tho lol havent read it)


message 62: by Fadwa (new)

Fadwa Marghany  (fadwaezzat) I guess the first part would be a little boring but the second would be pretty good.


message 63: by [deleted user] (new)

Ok both twilight, the hunger games and divergent are being made by lions gate. They certainly like trilogies. The mocking jay ((which I am freaking out waiting for it to come out, November 21)) is in two parts and so is Alliegent. Notice those are the last books in their series. Twilights last movie was in two parts so lions gate takes the last book from trilogies and splits it in half to get more money from it. Smart on their half but sad fro me and everybody else to wait.


message 64: by Sabrina (new)

Sabrina (forebodinq) I agree with Athen, they are purely splitting the movie because of money. There is really no other reason for them to do it. To me, Allegiant had the least happening of all the books. I seriously don't know how they're going to make the movies exciting and not angst-overload. I'm not convinced that they're going to stay true to the book at all.


message 65: by Hannah (new)

Hannah | 1 comments I don't think I can wait for 2 parts...


message 66: by [deleted user] (new)

Yay I agreed with :D


message 67: by Lucy (new)

Lucy They are only splitting it in two because they will get more money. Think about it... One movie=money two movies= double the money


message 68: by [deleted user] (new)

That was my point up there ^....


message 69: by [deleted user] (new)

Like I already said, if they split it into two movies than they have absolutely no reason to leave anything out


message 70: by [deleted user] (new)

Good point, allegiant((which btw I like JUST finsihed reading two seconds ago)) is being spilt up which means they can add a lot of detail I to the movies from the books. I guess the whole part 1 and part 2 thing have their own pros and cons


message 71: by Manoushka (last edited Nov 17, 2014 07:40AM) (new)

Manoushka (lover_of_many_fandoms) | 27 comments g.∂. ❣ We were born to be together ❣ wrote: "No. Not two parts. Why, you might ask. Read:

This was the least climatic book in series. Yah, that's a problem! And now they want to split it into two? The first one will be very boring, it'll ju..."


I concur! If they break it into two, I truly believe that they will add more scenes and might even stray away from the book due to the low climatic book scenes.


message 72: by Emma (new)

Emma Yup! I don't know why they do this with every book! It's sort of annoying!


message 73: by Gwen (new)

Gwen  (lemonadewho) | 23 comments noooooo ;(
i'll probably have to wait for another year!!!
which means i have to wait until march for insurgent and the rest for allegiant which means i have to wait about for another 2 years???


message 74: by Stephanie (new)

Stephanie Noel (wherestephaniereads) I find it kind of annoying because if the last book is the last book than there shouldn't be a movie with two parts. Its just keeps the trilogy dragging on. I prefer to get to number 3 and than move on to another series. Its an annoying trend. I hope future series would do this. I actually like Percy Jackson and City of Bones.


message 75: by Rosie (new)

Rosie | 6 comments i think if it is split into 2 movies it will create suspense, but i would prefer it to be 1 full movie.


message 76: by (new)

♡ (evrkive) I think it's because they're changing stuff, if they are changing insurgent(or at least some things), they can be planning on doing the same with Allegiant


message 77: by Emma (new)

Emma I'm not very happy about it. That's all I can say. Just means us fans have to wait longer.


message 78: by Gwen (new)

Gwen  (lemonadewho) | 23 comments HAVING TWO PARTS MIGHT TURN OUT WELL
alligent has a lot of details and stories to it so if they make it good, its going to be good (thumbs up :P )


message 79: by Gu (new)

Gu Gu | 4 comments Money making.

I WON't WATCH ALLEGIANT MOVIE If TRIS die so illogically same as the Book.
I won't watch (and also ask all my friends to boycott/ not to watch) Allegiant.


Anyway, as long as TRIS live, if movie decide to have ALTERNATE ENDING, as it should be, I would watch whatever how many parts they divide. Maybe TEN+ TIMES :-)
It would be Very COURAGEOUS MOVE of the MOVIE-MAKERS, and Roth if they dare to alter like this, while letting their dear fans ENJOY the real ENJOYMENT.


message 80: by Zakary (new)

Zakary (zakedmondson) I don't like how its happening to all the last movies of a book series e.g. Harry Potter, Mockingjay, Twilight and now ALLEGIANT?!??!


message 81: by Charlotte (new)

Charlotte (elle_the_fairy) | 9 comments Zak wrote: "I don't like how its happening to all the last movies of a book series e.g. Harry Potter, Mockingjay, Twilight and now ALLEGIANT?!??!"

Well, it is kind if annoying but to me I think it's nice because then you get to see more of the book, in the movie


message 82: by Mackenzie (new)

Mackenzie | 1 comments I think it is a good idea so they can have things in the book be longer


message 83: by [deleted user] (last edited Sep 15, 2015 02:02PM) (new)

Allegiant Part 1 and Part 2 Have Been Retitled as The Following. Allegiant and Ascendent

Here are The Logos






message 84: by Madz (new)

Madz (madz22) It's so sad that they are changing the name of the 2nd movie! I don't think I can wait until they come out!


message 85: by [deleted user] (new)

Maddy (Madz) wrote: "It's so sad that they are changing the name of the 2nd movie! I don't think I can wait until they come out!"


I Love The Names They Picked :D

Same Here


« previous 1 2 next »
back to top