World, Writing, Wealth discussion
All Things Writing & Publishing
>
Who can spread a word about a book?
date
newest »


That being said, my friends and family members have started talking to each other and to me about my books, which is nice.


Not having the pressure of recommending a book or having to be the one telling readers about it is what I like about marketing tools like those here: https://ryanlanz.com/advertise-your-b... You can put your book or service out to tens of thousands of people who will not complain if they don't like what your recommended (or wrote), and you don't have to feel like you're bragging. Plus, it's affordable, with options starting at about the same as a cup of coffee...a win all the way around. :-)



Me personally, it is still word of mouth. What I have noticed is that I do read paper and that itself generates discussion with recommendations. People are more likely to ask about a book as compared to an ereader. Maybe it is obvious I am reading a book and they may not know what is on the ereader.



But as far as word of mouth, book clubs, libraries, and such, almost never, which makes me feel somewhat hypocritical as a self-published author. I guess you could say that by searching top book sites it is somewhat word of mouth but that method tends to favor traditionally published works. And there are a lot of good self-published stories out there that may never get discovered.

Promoting any product requires investment of effort, research, time, and money. Very few novice authors ever achieve commercial success within this extremely competitive field. That said; some have. There is no reason why you might not eventually become one of them. I wish you success.

You have tapped a great point for me. Until I came to Goodreads, I never read much by independent authors thinking it was mostly fan fiction or not ready for prime time. However, I won a Independent author's book and loved it. Since then I read lots of independent and review all that I read, the good, the bad, and the ugly. I take every review no matter who wrote what seriously. I do this because it is important to treat every author both fairly and seriously. Have I been treated the last six years. Lots of great stories that I wonder why they cannot get published in the regular ways.


Unfortunately, as with any product, the first casualty attributed to expansion from a few well-established, experienced producers to vast numbers of unestablished, inexperienced producers, is, more often than not, quality.
Instead of trained, professional, unbiased gatekeepers being tasked with judging whether or not a manuscript meets at least minimal quality requirements for consideration for publication and widespread distribution, the producer of the work now often makes that determination.
In order to ensure even a minimal chance for commercial success, a novice writer should allow unbiased, qualified individuals to judge the quality of their work prior to investing the considerable time, energy, and money required to produce, market, promote, and distribute formats of their book.
The odds against attaining commercial success within this extremely competitive field are daunting, but not impossible, to overcome. Be realistic and honest with yourself and you may actually become one of the few who do eventually succeed. I wish you success.

The odds against attaining commercial success within this extremely competitive field are daunting, but not impossible, to overcome...."
Not bad an advice. There is a lot of support and mutual encouragement among authors, yet your sobering voice is not less important to bridge between actual and desired
But do people (except for specialized sites like here) still discuss books?
When the last time you talked books during a coffee break at work or with someone in real life?