The Old Curiosity Club discussion

This topic is about
Our Mutual Friend
Our Mutual Friend
>
OMF, Book 1, Chp. 11-13
Peter wrote: "I truly enjoy your personal comments with the analysis..."soon be at our Christmas read ."
There is only one person in the world who could even think, let alone articulate, that thought in June.
There is only one person in the world who could even think, let alone articulate, that thought in June.
LindaH wrote: "Re line Kim quoted, "The wind sawed, and the sawdust whirled.": I'm not sure what it refers to. "
Dickens goes on to talk about top sawyers and bottom sawyers. References that may have passed without notice by most readers, but wouldn't have in Dickens's day, and are clear as a bell to woodworkers with any sense of the history of building or woodworking.
In the days before mechanized sawmills, the way in which trees were made into boards were two. One was to chop notches in the side of the tree and then knock the notches off to make a roughly flat surface and then smooth it with a broad axe and an adz. You want to see how this works?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Au1Tb...
However, the English way was the sawpit. You would dig a pit, almost like the pit that auto mechanics used before lifts became more ubiquitous, put the tree across it, and have one person on top of the log and one down in the pit sawing, like this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LV_K8...
Of course, the one on the bottom got all the sawdust drifting down into his eyes and face and hair and down his neck, unless he had a good hat on. And this is exactly what Dickens is referring to when he wrote "Every street was a sawpit, and there were no top-sawyers; every passenger was an under-sawyer, with the sawdust blinding him and choking him."
Dickens goes on to talk about top sawyers and bottom sawyers. References that may have passed without notice by most readers, but wouldn't have in Dickens's day, and are clear as a bell to woodworkers with any sense of the history of building or woodworking.
In the days before mechanized sawmills, the way in which trees were made into boards were two. One was to chop notches in the side of the tree and then knock the notches off to make a roughly flat surface and then smooth it with a broad axe and an adz. You want to see how this works?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Au1Tb...
However, the English way was the sawpit. You would dig a pit, almost like the pit that auto mechanics used before lifts became more ubiquitous, put the tree across it, and have one person on top of the log and one down in the pit sawing, like this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LV_K8...
Of course, the one on the bottom got all the sawdust drifting down into his eyes and face and hair and down his neck, unless he had a good hat on. And this is exactly what Dickens is referring to when he wrote "Every street was a sawpit, and there were no top-sawyers; every passenger was an under-sawyer, with the sawdust blinding him and choking him."
Mary Lou wrote: "[Referring to spreadsheets of characters] that's what I had to do with Martin Chuzzlewit! Only I was old-fashioned and wrote my family trees, etc. by hand. :-) I'm pleased to say that I did/do not have that confusion with OMF, though there are a lot of characters and story lines to keep straight. "
I think the difference is that in OMF there aren't, at least so far, any convoluted family relationships we have to keep track of.
I think the difference is that in OMF there aren't, at least so far, any convoluted family relationships we have to keep track of.
Peter wrote: "I like the Stone illustrations. In Chapter 11 there is a sense of grandeur which bespeaks the Podsnap's world."
But there are a lot more than 17 (or, with the Podsnaps, 20) people in that room!
But there are a lot more than 17 (or, with the Podsnaps, 20) people in that room!

Dickens goes on to talk about top sawyers and bottom sawyers. References that may h..."
Also, a top-sawyer was slang for a person who could drive to an inch, whose driving ability was to be much admired.
Cindy wrote: "Also, a top-sawyer was slang for a person who could drive to an inch, whose driving ability was to be much admired. "
Perhaps because he was the one who could see the line they were supposed to be sawing to and was responsible for keeping the saw on the line.
Perhaps because he was the one who could see the line they were supposed to be sawing to and was responsible for keeping the saw on the line.

Perhaps because he was the one who could see the line they were ..."
Maybe! A man who knew how to drive a carriage, especially a sporting phaeton or curricle with expertise was considered a top-sawyer. Even back then, men were all about showing off in their vehicles! ;)
Everyman wrote: "their nastiness being exacerbated by the fact that they don't appear to be rogues, as say Fagin and Bill Sykes do."
I would think it vital for the success of a person as a rogue that they do not seem like a rogue at first, and second, sight. :-)
I would think it vital for the success of a person as a rogue that they do not seem like a rogue at first, and second, sight. :-)
Cindy wrote: "I stopped reading at the end of Chapter 13, so the next chapter may prove me wrong, but the ending made me deeply suspicious of Rogue Riderhood. He took off alone to look for Hexam and comes back t..."
Whereas I would easily put it past Riderhood to kill a man, I think that in this particular situation, his interest is in making sure that Hexam is arrested alive. He cannot be very sure of cashing in on his reward if the man he claims to be the murderer of Harmon is dead - although when he is alive, he might prove his innocence.
Whereas I would easily put it past Riderhood to kill a man, I think that in this particular situation, his interest is in making sure that Hexam is arrested alive. He cannot be very sure of cashing in on his reward if the man he claims to be the murderer of Harmon is dead - although when he is alive, he might prove his innocence.

Furthermore Mr Podsnap is the epitome of 19th century racism. I cringed, while being greatly amused, at how he just does away with the whole European continent with one fell swoop (of his right arm!). Then it dawned on me: the UK today with its Brexiteers and far-right politics has not advanced much, or at all, in regard to the 'foreigner' on our shores. Some of the rhetoric that they spout could be penned by Dickens. I'm sure that he would be horrified to find that his caricature is alive and well.


Then I'm also uncomfortable with Eugene as Mary Lou has mentioned and also Linda and Cindy? I wasn't sure what to make of his looking through the window at Lizzie by the firelight and then the strange behaviour with the drawing of the lady and repeatedly touching it. It's true, of course, that this may have simply been an absentminded doodle with pursuant mannerism. We just don't know yet ...
Hilary wrote: "I think that Riderhood is a fascinating character. He's someone I love to hate. In the audio with David Timson, Rogue Riderhood has a husky sort of Cockney accent, I think. I exploded with laughter..."
Yes. I too think we need to keep an eye on Eugene - but perhaps not through a window :-)) He is rather an odious person so far.
Yes. I too think we need to keep an eye on Eugene - but perhaps not through a window :-)) He is rather an odious person so far.
Rogue Riderhood's "Alfred David" is a nice interpretation of a Latin term, as are Mr. Boffin's readings of the names of the historical persons in "The Decline and Fall" - like Bully Sawyers for the general Belisarius. It's wonderful how Dickens manages to give many of his characters their individual linguistic fingerprints.

Curses! I forgot about the reward. You're right--he'll need Hexam to be alive to collect. Oh, well, Miss Marple I'm not! ;)
And I, too, love your phrase "linguistic fingerprints." Very apt!

I wonder that myself too on occasion! Yesterday we got drenched through, and today is forecast to be the same, with the wind and rain swirling around the caravan. Apparently it will clear by about midnight, and we will have a dry night. Well that's alright then ;)
On the other hand we had had a few days of really sunny weather, with those puffy white cumulus clouds, and the scenery looked quite beautiful. You'd have hated the heat Kim!
I guess that in this novel Dickens is painting a gloomy, mud-soaked quagmire of a river area for us - and doing it very effectively!

Jean wrote: "I laughed and laughed at "Alfred David" as I had quite fixed the name in my mind as being another new character Dickens had introduced!"
I, too, have a soft spot for puns, and as I said elsewhere, I found it very funny how Mr Boffin turned all the Roman names from Gibbon into English ones, e.g. Polybius into Polly Beeios, or Belisarius into Bully Sawyers, remarking of the latter that his conduct is unworthy of his English origins.
I, too, have a soft spot for puns, and as I said elsewhere, I found it very funny how Mr Boffin turned all the Roman names from Gibbon into English ones, e.g. Polybius into Polly Beeios, or Belisarius into Bully Sawyers, remarking of the latter that his conduct is unworthy of his English origins.

I'm also enjoying the word "Podsnappery", which we still use. The dictionary defines it as "smug self-satisfaction and a lack of interest in the affairs of others". It was nice to meet the original for it!
We met the original character on whom "Pecksniffian" was based: Seth Pecksniff in Martin Chuzzlewit. The dictionary defines "Pecksniffian" as "hypocritically and unctuously affecting benevolence or high moral principles", but I like "Podsnappery" just as much :)
A "Scrooge"' as meaning a skinflint has passed into our vernacular, and I think "Pickwickian" has too, but these are a little less well known, perhaps.




I'll have to start it first, Jean! It might be awhile. So many books....
As for the names becoming part of our English vernacular, here in the US, Scrooge would be the most commonly used word, moreso than Podsnappery, Pecksniffian, or Pickwickian (and don't forget the use of "Gamp" for an umbrella, which I think is considered archaic at this point). A certain talk show host used to end his show with quirky words, and succeeded in bringing "Pecksniffian" to the masses, but it still wouldn't have topped Scrooge.
Jean wrote: "Kim said "Sometimes I wonder if it is ever sunny in England. Jean?"
I wonder that myself too on occasion!"
Meanwhile the purportedly soggy Pacific Northwest just broke a string of over 30 dry days with a tiny sprinkling of moisture -- 6/100 of an inch at our house, just enough to get the porch damp. Otherwise, we have had a dry, dry, dry June and July, and no further moisture in sight for at least the next 10 days (that's as far out as my weather forecasting page goes). Our lawn is completely brown (our well can't provide enough water to keep it wet, so we just let it go brown, and it recovers each fall) except where the drainfield outflow is, which is nice and green!
I wonder that myself too on occasion!"
Meanwhile the purportedly soggy Pacific Northwest just broke a string of over 30 dry days with a tiny sprinkling of moisture -- 6/100 of an inch at our house, just enough to get the porch damp. Otherwise, we have had a dry, dry, dry June and July, and no further moisture in sight for at least the next 10 days (that's as far out as my weather forecasting page goes). Our lawn is completely brown (our well can't provide enough water to keep it wet, so we just let it go brown, and it recovers each fall) except where the drainfield outflow is, which is nice and green!

Everyman wrote: "Otherwise, we have had a dry, dry, dry June and July, and no further moisture in sight for at least the next 10 days (that's as far out as my weather forecasting page goes). Our lawn is completely brown (our well can't provide enough water to keep it wet,"
Sounds like Pennsylvania.
Sounds like Pennsylvania.
Jean wrote: "Kim said "Sometimes I wonder if it is ever sunny in England. Jean?"
I wonder that myself too on occasion! Yesterday we got drenched through, and today is forecast to be the same, with the wind and..."
The heat is awful here, I think so anyway, and if I loose my sunglasses, which I have twice this week, I can hardly bring myself to go out into that migraine inducing bright, bright, bright sunlight. Tonight on the news it was very nice of our weatherman to talk about cooler days ahead. It's only supposed to get into the 80's, not the 90s this week. Yipee.
Oh, 80 degrees is 26.666 degrees Celsius. I looked it up of course. And 90 is 32.222 or something like that. At least it looks cold to me.
I wonder that myself too on occasion! Yesterday we got drenched through, and today is forecast to be the same, with the wind and..."
The heat is awful here, I think so anyway, and if I loose my sunglasses, which I have twice this week, I can hardly bring myself to go out into that migraine inducing bright, bright, bright sunlight. Tonight on the news it was very nice of our weatherman to talk about cooler days ahead. It's only supposed to get into the 80's, not the 90s this week. Yipee.
Oh, 80 degrees is 26.666 degrees Celsius. I looked it up of course. And 90 is 32.222 or something like that. At least it looks cold to me.
Kim wrote: "Jean wrote: "Kim said "Sometimes I wonder if it is ever sunny in England. Jean?"
I wonder that myself too on occasion! Yesterday we got drenched through, and today is forecast to be the same, with..."
Kim
If you moved to the Pacific NW, say the State of Washington, you would enjoy cooler temperatures. As an added bonus Everyman and Linda would be close by and I'm just across the border.
Just think ... ocean, snow-capped mountains and Pickwickian neighbours.
I wonder that myself too on occasion! Yesterday we got drenched through, and today is forecast to be the same, with..."
Kim
If you moved to the Pacific NW, say the State of Washington, you would enjoy cooler temperatures. As an added bonus Everyman and Linda would be close by and I'm just across the border.
Just think ... ocean, snow-capped mountains and Pickwickian neighbours.

Sounds wonderful right now. In January, maybe not as good. :-)
Jean wrote: I'm also enjoying the word "Podsnappery", which we still use. The dictionary defines it as "smug self-satisfaction and a lack of interest in the affairs of others". It was nice to meet the original for it!
I always considered myself the original for this one :-(
I always considered myself the original for this one :-(
Mary Lou wrote: "Jean wrote: "Mary Lou - I had exactly the same reaction as you "I get a little stab in my heart on behalf of Catherine" when I read the barbed comment about sparrows repenting of their marriages. I..."
Podsnappery, however, has a very nice ring to it. It somehow expresses its meaning in its sound.
Podsnappery, however, has a very nice ring to it. It somehow expresses its meaning in its sound.

I'm also enjoying the word "Podsnappery", which we still use. The dictionary defines it as "smug self-satisfaction and a lack of interest in the affairs of others". It was nice to meet the original for it!..."
I was quite taken with the word as soon as I saw it. I'm delighted that it has a real-world application and is actually used! You don't hear "podsnappery" too much here in Texas, which, in my opinion, makes a visit to England even more of an imperative for me! ;)

LOL Tristram!

"Dickens insisted he only used some of Forster's mannerisms for this character, who was in no way to represent his closest friend. Forster, like Dickens, rose with difficulty from an impoverished middle-class background. The character of Podsnap was used to represent the views of "Society,"..."
and the rest of the sentence is spoilerish, so don't look at the entry if you don't know the novel!

Jean, I don't have the Slater bio, but will take a look at my Tomalin and Smiley bios to see if they say anything. I seem to recall that among some of the peers, perhaps even someone like George Gissing, there was sort of this "belief" that Forster was the model for Podsnap.

Here is what Smiley wrote:
Tradition has it that Podsnap was based on none other than John Forster, as Harold Skimpole had been based upon Leigh Hunt, and once again Dickens managed to betray a friend and portray a characteristic at the same time, though tradition also has it that he got away with it and that Forster never revealed whether or not he realized what Dickens had done.

"Did Mr. R. consider that, in the course of a few weeks, his book would be in the hands of almost every family in the kingdom - does he consider that such passages... would be apt to raise a blush on the cheek of a young English female becoming the pride of her purity?"
Not very far from Podsnap in Chapter 11 - "The question about everything was, would it bring a blush into the cheek of the young person?"
There are also lots of other references - I find it pretty convincing. I haven't read this full biography yet, as I had lost it in my disorganised bookshelf - must get on and do so!


Tradition has it that Podsnap was based on none other than John Forster, as Harold Skimpole had been based upon..."
Thanks very much for searching this out John :) That does seem a little different from the Wiki article, which I thought rather implied that Forster was well aware of it.

This is a book I had not heard of! Thank you too Judy, for taking the trouble to research this :)

This..."
My pleasure Jean - you spurred me on to track down my copy of the Forster bio, which has been lost for ages!

Forster was a man of somewhat overbearing manner, which was merely the mask of a very tender and sympathetic character. This manner is caricatured in Podsnap.
Additionally,
Forster's hose, 58 Lincoln's Inn Fields, was the original of Mr. Tulkinghorn's chambers."
A caption under Forster's photo indicates that he was also the model for Dowler, from Pickwick but the Dowler and Forster entries don't mention it.
Books mentioned in this topic
David Copperfield (other topics)Bleak House (other topics)
Richard Dadd: The Artist and the Asylum (other topics)
Bleak House (other topics)
Bleak House (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Leigh Hunt (other topics)John Forster (other topics)
James A. Davies (other topics)
James A. Davies (other topics)
Michael Slater (other topics)
More...
That was my feeling too. It's obvious that her mother doesn't understand her, dragging all those men over and making her dance with them is only one example of that. But I fear that there isn't much hope for Georgiana. She seems unlikely ever to attract a good man, and on the other hand she has fallen into the hands of as nasty a pair of rogues as Dickens has created, their nastiness being exacerbated by the fact that they don't appear to be rogues, as say Fagin and Bill Sykes do.