Pakistani Readers discussion
(Urdu Literature) اردو ادب
>
عمیرہ احمد مقبول کیوں ؟
date
newest »


وہ جواز مصن..."
And do you personally agree with it after completely reading and analyzing the work of Umaira Ahmed , Sir?

Would love to know your views on it"
I read her novels Peer e Kamil , Sheher e Zaat and another one (the name of which I don't remember now) some years ago. Personally , I think she isn't totally Islamic in her novels and yes she uses Islam to mold her story in such a way that one thinks everything mentioned in her novel is Islamic . The unaccustomed reader tries to think that she/he has got the pass to do the things mentioned in novel . Whereas Islam does not teach us that. In Islam , the rules are straightforward ; no one is allowed to talk(or keep relation) with Na-mehram unless there is some valid reason to do so and that too behind Pardah . And the talks must be businesslike as not to incite any feelings in the either of the person. But Umaira Ahmed does not write under these criteria , hence her writings are not purely Islamic.
If we look at the other side of the coin, I think her writings are at least better than the digest crap and other novels which openly inspire people to diverge from religion. Umaira Ahmed chooses the path somewhere in between. Her writings inspire one to get closer to religion to some extent at least but they don't let anyone to get away from religion. Like in Sheher e Zaat , the girl gets closer to the religion and there is no scene in that novel that leads us to conclude the the novel is diverting. Or as in Peer e Kamil , there are many scenes that are not totally Islamic but the overall story describes a bad person turning into a good person which inspires us to become somewhat like the protagonist ie: religious. Her path is somewhat better than aforementioned type of authors.
And it is kind of uncanny too. Normally religious people won't be benefited much from her novels and so her novels are mainly for people who are kindda secular . no one who is secular will read a novel which completely religious and rigid. So U.Ahmed tries to bend the Islamic teachings a little and tries to make the novel somewhat acceptable for those people. So those people read the novel and become religious slightly if not totally. So at least U.Ahmed brings some positive change in them. Even looking at it Islamically , " talking with opposite gender without physical interaction is a less severe crime than Zina or such stuff"
I hope you understand my POV :)
two people can have a different opinion in case our philosophies don't resonate :)


I have read a couple of novels of Nemrah Ahmed and she does not use religion wrongly . Yes she is somewhat idealistic but that doesn't matter because a lot of authors are idealistic. Actually Nemrah Ahmed focuses on the small lessons and morals in her novels. The story of her novel is kept idealistic up to some extent but it is intended to be that way because it keeps a reader's interest . You can check the fb page of Nemrah AHmed and see what she actually intends to do .just give it a try. Here:
https://www.facebook.com/nemrah.ahmed...
Every author is loved and hated by a lot of people. So your friend may be among the latter ones . Perhaps your friend does not like the genre of the novels of Nemrah Ahmed.

اب جب فطری تقاضوں کی وجہ سے نوجوان کا سامنا "حرام" محبت سے ہوتا ہے تو دماغ میں پہلے سے موجود عقائد کی وجہ سے غیر محسوس طریقے سے احساس گناہ میں بھی مبتلا ہو جاتا ہے . اس احساس کو مٹھانے کے لئے وہ کسی جواز کی تلاش میں رہتے جس سے ان کے احساسات تک کو مشرف بہ اسلام کیا جا سکے
اور اس کم کا ٹھیکہ ہمارے ہاں عمیرہ احمد ، نمرہ احمد اور اس قبیل کی دوسری ڈائجیسٹ لکھاریوں نے لیا ہوا ہے ... اس حرام محبت کو مذہب کا تڑکا لگا کر حلال صورت میں پیش کرنا ... اگر کسی کی(صرف) آواز پیاری لگی تو غلط لیکن نعت پڑھتے ہوئے آواز پیاری لگے تو حلال محبت ...
یہ روایت پرانی ہے نسیم حجازی صاحب نے بھی یہی کا م کیا ہے ...

فیس بک سسے لئے گئے دو اقتباس
ازابیلے: "سفوف سے آگے کیا ہے۔"
سمیر: "میرا نتھنا"
ازابیلے: "نتھنے سے آگے کیا ہے"
سمیر: "Ecstacy"
ازابیلے: "Ecstacy سے آگے کیا ہے"
سمیر: "امران خان دے جلسے اچ نچنے نوں جی کردا "
بیلی نیازیاں کا شہزادہ از نمرہ احمد
کوئٹہ ہوٹل بیٹھ کر ادھار کے کش لگانے والا کوئی دھاڑیل کیا جانے کہ احساس کی پوروں سے بھگوکر خواہشوں کے گرداب میں نچڑی ہوئی بھنڈیاں اور حیا کے آنچل کے کونے کے پلو کی نکر سے بندھی ہوئی چانپیں ایک بار اگر فریج میں رکھ دی جائیں تو وہ کون سے خانے میں چلی جاتی ہیں
ایویں بکواس پئے کری جاندی او از نمرہ احمد

اب جب فطری تقاضوں کی وج..."
You are right there. Many authors are doing this thing but as far as I remember Umaira Ahmed does not label it as Islamic . She just gives an illusion which is mostly enough to beguile the readers however a true Muslim knows what is wrong so he is not affected by these things . After all we read a lot of western authors too whose writings are against the teachings of Islam. Why don't you condemn them , sir ?
As for Nemrah Ahmed , please tell me just one thing mentioned by her in her all novels as Islamic that indeed is not Islamic ?

فیس بک سسے لئے گئے دو اقتباس
ازابیلے: "سفوف سے ..."
None of these lines are in any way written by Nemrah Ahmed or Umaira Ahmed . Please use valid citations with whatever you comment :)

اب جب فطری تقاضوں کی وج..."
Naseem hijazi to raziya sultana k soh-har ko he muslaan bna k peesh karta hai-- usny history ko mazaahab ka saahi tarkaa lagya hai

فیس بک سسے لئے گئے دو اقتباس
ازابیلے: "سفوف سے ..."
in alfaaz ka maazah ek ek kash mein leny do zara mujy
bhoooooot khoob . bhot ummda

Would love to know your views on it"
I read her novels Peer e Kamil , Sheher e Zaat and another one (the name of which I don't remember now) some years ago. Person..."
matter is not how much Islamic she is? It doesn't matter. FIrst you have to understand whats the role of novelist
is she portraying true picture of society or our feelings ? The things people thought? does she catch those ? of-course not way near
In urdu we say
" ki tumhry aur apky andar panapnay walaay ganday jazaabat ki akaaasi karty hain wooh ? bilkul b nahi "
"Alee pur ka alee " parhna kbi,,,apko andaza ho jaye ga mein kia kehna chah raha hu

very true.....

Would love to know your views on it"
I read her novels Peer e Kamil , Sheher e Zaat and another one (the name of which I don't remember now) some ..."
Alipur ka aeli is on my tbr list, I'll read it soon and try to get your
pov :)

Umaira Ahmad is far better and serious writer than all of those. Still i didn't like her most novels as they are having repetitive Alpha female theme but her Peer e Kamil and couple of more writings are very firm and geniously crafted plots.
Why is she popular?
Well you never noticed that you and me are star plus nation which didnt have anything to read something which could grip today's scenario.
Glory days are passed. Delhi, Lucknow things dont fascinate people. They want to know that how pre marital relations are affected by wave of unemployment?
They want to know that how mutual attractions survive in the age of IT.
They want new snd realistic topics. So that's why my friend She is popular.
P.S. No i am not fan of Nimra Ahmad.
Neither am i fan of "Khawateen Digest Literature" kind of things. It boils my blood because of irritation.
وہ جواز مصنفہ نے شعوری یا غیر شعوری طور پر مذہب میں سے تلاش کیا ہے۔ یعنی محبوب سے مل نہیں سکتے تو فراق عین اسلامی ہے اور ہجر اللہ کی عنایت ہے، مل گئے ہیں تو شریعت ایک دوسرے کو چھونے کی اجازت نہیں دیتی لہذا وصل کے لمحات میں ایک دوسرے پر درود پڑھ پڑھ کر پھونکیں ماریں۔
لڑکیاں اور لڑکے بھی ایسے ناول پڑھ کر اپنی ان محرومیوں کو وصف سمجھتے ہوئے چوم چاٹ کر قبول کر تو لیتے ہیں مگر اندر ہی اندر ان کے فطری جذبات سلگ سلگ کر راکھ بھی ہوتے رہتے ہیں۔
مسئلہ یہ ہے کہ جبلت بہت کمینی شے ہے، آپ اپنے آپ کو کامیاب انداز میں دھوکہ دے سکتے ہیں مگر اس کی چابکوں کے دیے درد کو نہ تو زیادہ دیر سہہ سکتے ہیں اور نہ ہی زخموں سے بھری پیٹھ چھپا سکتے ہیں۔
قرب عباس
❤️💛💚💙💜❤️