The Readers Review: Literature from 1714 to 1910 discussion

This topic is about
The Return of the Native
Thomas Hardy Collection
>
The Return of the Native - Background Information
date
newest »


He is certainly a very enjoyable author.
And his poetry is also very worth reading.

Oh, go ahead. Yield to temptation!

Rochelle wrote: "The news that Hardy wrote only tragic stories is highly exaggerated. He wrote exactly one cheerful novel, Under the Greenwood Tree."
:-D
The Hand of Ethelberta has a lot of comedy in it. It's one of my favorites.
:-D
The Hand of Ethelberta has a lot of comedy in it. It's one of my favorites.
One of his early novels, Two on a Tower, has a hint of the Gothic novel-very dramatic and plot-driven.
Rosemarie wrote: "One of his early novels, Two on a Tower, has a hint of the Gothic novel-very dramatic and plot-driven."
I loved that book
I loved that book

LOL! But weren't the lives of the people he wrote about often fairly tragic? Especially after the 19th century Enclosure Acts?
Deborah wrote: "Rosemarie wrote: "One of his early novels, Two on a Tower, has a hint of the Gothic novel-very dramatic and plot-driven."
I loved that book"
Me too!
I loved that book"
Me too!

LOL! But weren't the lives of the..."
There must have been some cheerful English people in the 19th Century, but Hardy usually chose not to see them. I hear there was a rash of suicides after Jude the Obscure was published, and there's a reason why The Hand of Ethelberta has been forgotten ;-)
Anyway, I'll reread ROTN with you. It's a favorite of mine.

You've made me plan to go back and re-read it. It's been many, many, many years. I've forgotten almost everything about it.

LOL. He's earned that title honestly. I've read several and his characters rarely catch a break. But perhaps tragedy was his thing and what inspired the Debbie Downer moniker that followed. :-)
I might join in this one. I read this in high school and all I remember is something about bonfires as a pagan holdover (Midsummer?)
Under the Greenwood Tree is charming and very unlike his other books. The Trumpet-Major is also more of a small-town drama.
Under the Greenwood Tree is charming and very unlike his other books. The Trumpet-Major is also more of a small-town drama.

Under the Greenwood Tree is charming and very unlike his other ..."
Samhain, the precursor to Halloween.


I don't have an answer, but I have some thoughts.
Perhaps because he agreed with Thoreau that "The mass of men live lives of quiet desperation." He wrote mostly about rural lives in 19th Century England when the rural life was changing dramatically, and often not for the better. To some extent, I think his books reflect the reality of real lives better than Austen or Dickens or Trollope.
He was a great believer in fate -- somewhat in agreement with Gloucester's contention that "As flies to wanton boys are we to th' gods;/They kill us for their sport." He had, I've read, the view that most men and women spend their lives struggling against what fate has in store for them, but generally lose the struggle. It's just his way of looking at life, I think. But it makes for great reading!
I don't have an answer, but would say it's a great way to illustrate the effects of societal norms on individuals. Those effects would feel less powerful in happier books. Me, I enjoy Hardy for his lyrical writing and strong female characters.
I have read some non-fiction books about the lives of rural farm workers, and they were extremely harsh. Hardy may have observed the actual conditions of those living in the country and not glamorized them the way some other authors did.
Hardy's books can be compared to those of Zola; they are both dark, grim and tragic at times.
Hardy's books can be compared to those of Zola; they are both dark, grim and tragic at times.

I agree about the lyrical writing and strong female characters, and would add that I also greatly enjoy his very accurate presentation of rural southwest England of that era, and also his rich vocabulary. I always run across words in Hardy that I don't know, which I don't with very many authors, and he isn't doing it to "show off," but because he uses precision in language rather than close enough.
He even has a title that was a new word to me -- A Laodicean. I'm sure everybody else here knows what it means. I had to look it up. But once you know it, it can be a very useful word, particularly in the modern day and age.

I was also profoundly moved by his empathy towards animal sufferings. The shot birds passage in Tess is one of the most poignant scene I've read.
One of my favourite parts of this particular novel is Hardy's description of nature, the moors and the mood created by the bonfires.

I think Return of the Native also has gothic elements, with Egdon Heath substituting for the gothic novel's castle.
I reread ROTN with a Goodreads Hardy group about a year ago and enjoyed it more now than when I first read it at age 25.
I also had to look up "Laodicean" when I read it. I am not a Laodicean about Hardy - he's probably my favorite author.
Dianne will be leading our discussion on this book and will be opening the week one discussion tomorrow.
I read this book two years ago, so it is still fairly fresh in my mind. I will enjoy reading the group's comments.



Very sorry to hear that. Non pet owners have no idea how traumatic the death of a beloved pet can be.
Kipling, though, knew:
“The Power of the Dog”
THERE is sorrow enough in the natural way
From men and women to fill our day;
And when we are certain of sorrow in store,
Why do we always arrange for more?
Brothers and Sisters, I bid you beware
Of giving your heart to a dog to tear.
Buy a pup and your money will buy
Love unflinching that cannot lie—
Perfect passion and worship fed
By a kick in the ribs or a pat on the head.
Nevertheless it is hardly fair
To risk your heart for a dog to tear.
When the fourteen years which Nature permits
Are closing in asthma, or tumour, or fits,
And the vet’s unspoken prescription runs
To lethal chambers or loaded guns,
Then you will find—it’s your own affair—
But … you’ve given your heart to a dog to tear.
When the body that lived at your single will,
With its whimper of welcome, is stilled (how still!).
When the spirit that answered your every mood
Is gone—wherever it goes—for good,
You will discover how much you care,
And will give your heart to a dog to tear.
We’ve sorrow enough in the natural way,
When it comes to burying Christian clay.
Our loves are not given, but only lent,
At compound interest of cent per cent.
Though it is not always the case, I believe,
That the longer we’ve kept ’em, the more do we grieve:
For, when debts are payable, right or wrong,
A short-time loan is as bad as a long—
So why in—Heaven (before we are there)
Should we give our hearts to a dog to tear?

I will also be joining in on the reading. I almost didn't get the book, but something drew me to buy it, now I know why I picked it up.


I saw the TV broadcast, it was the first time I ever saw Zeta-Jones, and I was impressed. I don't remember the tweaking of the story, but let's save that for our reading.

I saw the TV broadcast, it was the first time I ever saw Zeta-Jones, and I was impressed I don't remember the tweaking of the story, but let's save t..."
Yes I do! My name was already taken when I signed up for goodreads so I picked Gyoza as a username. It was lunchtime and gyoza are among my favorite foods. I was craving them.
I'm reading along but playing catch up. I've read it before but many moons ago. Hubby has been away since April so I'm juggling entirely too much.

http://thethomashardyassociation.org/...
Books mentioned in this topic
The Trumpet-Major (other topics)The Return of the Native (other topics)
(Short and sweet, I might add to this later but I am leery of reading about the book in the event of spoilers.)