Reading Envy Readers discussion
Readalong: East of Eden
>
East of Eden Week 1 - Chapters 1-9
date
newest »




Yes, the snake in the Garden of Eden, so to speak. Cathy is a really fascinating (and creepy) character

1. When the multitude of Hamiltons got introduced I had a moment of panic on how to keep track of them all. Then I decided not to keep track and let the story carry me. So far so good but we'll see if I get confused later.
2 Cathy and her 'hint of a smile' gave me the creeps, but definitely gave the first 100 pages the tension for the reader to keep going.
3. I'm confused by Charles and Ada's relationship. Do they like each other? Hate each other! Or is it something deeper that keeps Adam coming back to Charles? I'd love to hear everyone's thoughts!

It is definitely biblical in scope and I keep wondering if I should read the story of Adam, eve, Cain and Abel.
The character of Cyrus was particularly cold and some of the confrontations with his son's were tough to read. I wonder how someone who was not particularly heroic in the war rose to such an elevated position in the military. That simply seemed to be a given!
The conversation between Adam and Charles when Adam did eventually return to the farm was a brilliant juxtaposition; Adam does not love his father but believes his acquisition of riches and stories, yet Charles loves his father but doesn't believe his father.
As for Cathy Ames , I can only say that as a villain I am loving her story but a definite shocked face as I put down part 1 this morning over my toast.

It is definitely biblical in scope and I keep wondering if I should read the story of Adam, eve, Cain and Abel.
The character of Cyrus..."
I've read this twice before and was particularly struck by that conversation you mention in light of considering the original Cain and Abel story. Steinbeck's take on Charles'/Cain's feelings toward the father versus Adam who simply accepts the created "mythos" while willingly ignoring reality/truth. This is a fascinating part of each character's personality. Is this Steinbeck commenting upon Genesis, just using it for his own purposes, or something else?

Liked the story of the fathers; Cyrus and his long con, that with considerable self education turned into a nice career and contrasted nicely with Samuel who's a very clever inventor but never manages to make monetary gain. The Cain/Abel - Charles/Adam biblical take will be interesting to follow.
Can someone explain to me why all the women are either religious, humorless, sad and bitter but with good housekeeping skills or lazy, slovenly whores (who don't mind being beaten) and in the case of Cathy completely evil. If this is Steinbeck's view of women it must have been fun being one of his 3 wives.
Mary wrote: "I enjoyed the description of the setting in Chapter 1, I felt I could really visualize Salinas.
Liked the story of the fathers; Cyrus and his long con, that with considerable self education turned..."
Mary, you make a really good point about the female characters. That was something that was bothering me, too, although I couldn't put my finger on it.
There is one particular part that gave me pause:
Now, I know he's in the process of describing the extreme antisocial qualities of Cathy's character, but I wouldn't necessarily correlate asexuality with sociopathy. This quote felt like a moment of weakness for Steinbeck—a glimpse into a limited (and possibly tormented) understanding of human sexuality. Or perhaps it's just more biblical commentary?
Liked the story of the fathers; Cyrus and his long con, that with considerable self education turned..."
Mary, you make a really good point about the female characters. That was something that was bothering me, too, although I couldn't put my finger on it.
There is one particular part that gave me pause:
What freedom men and women could have, were they not constantly tricked and trapped and enslaved and tortured by their sexuality! The only drawback in that freedom is that without it one would not be a human. One would be a monster.
Now, I know he's in the process of describing the extreme antisocial qualities of Cathy's character, but I wouldn't necessarily correlate asexuality with sociopathy. This quote felt like a moment of weakness for Steinbeck—a glimpse into a limited (and possibly tormented) understanding of human sexuality. Or perhaps it's just more biblical commentary?

Cathy's character is quite chilling. I am holding my breath every time she is in a scene.
Also, I can't help but marvel at Steinbeck's great storytelling skills. What a talent to be able to create such a sweeping tale of humanity and do so with such vividness and realism. Wow. I am sorry I haven't gotten to this book sooner in my reading life.

Cyrus's first wife (and I have just looked is unnamed as Mrs Trask) of course drowns herself in a puddle in about two or three paragraphs, not sure if I blame her .
Adam admits to having a squaw at one point who did his washing and mending of clothes, was kind of soft and sweet and despite Charles thinking he was lucky she didn't put a knife in him died of smallpox.
Then they also mention a schoolteacher who shows some ankle and the other women drive her off.
I wonder other than Eve how prominent women are in the early books of the bible.
I confess my knowledge of Steinbeck's biography is limited - I didn't even know he had three wives. I did read this book and Grapes of Wrath as a teenager but have forgotten a lot of the story in both but also wonder how well he did women in Grapes of Wrath and his other works.
My Penguin classic edition has a long introduction but I am hesitant about reading that as more often than not although informative they sometimes give away plot points.
Andrew wrote: "My Penguin classic edition has a long introduction but I am hesitant about reading that as more often than not although informative they sometimes give away plot points. ."
I never ever do, but it might be interesting in the end.
I never ever do, but it might be interesting in the end.

Cyrus's first wife (and I have just looked is unnamed as Mrs Trask) of course drowns herself in a pu..."
The Bible is actually surprising for how many women get their own stories told and how assertive some of them are in getting their rights. Tamar, for example, goes to extraordinary measures and outwits the family patriarch in the process. (Too long to quote here, but if you want to read, it is here in Genesis 38. There are numerous other such stories where women star. For the times in which it was written, it is, as I said, extraordinary.

Cyrus's first wife (and I have just looked is unnamed as Mrs Trask) of course drowns ..."
Thanks Julie.

1. When the multitude of Hamiltons got introduced I had a moment of panic on how to keep track of them all. Then I decided not to keep t..."
I felt the same way and I had to go back once or twice to refresh my memory but overall I was able to keep track.

I thought it was interesting that he wrote "I must depend on hearsay, on old photographs, on stories told, and on memories which are hazy and mixed with fable in trying to tell you about the Hamiltons" but seemed to know all kinds of trivial facts about the Trasks. The Trasks soon become the main characters, of course, but I was wondering why he introduced the Hamiltons this way.


The Hamiltons are John Steinbeck's ancestors. When I took a trip to Salinas to visit the John Steinbeck museum, we visited the Hamilton gravesites. He wrote this book for his sons. He weaves a lot of biographical things in here. Mary and John are his sister and him. He loved his sister dearly and the museum has lots of letters he wrote to her.

I would love to visit this area of California some day. Steinbeck is the only writer that has a museum exclusively dedicated to him (does that seem right?). I went down a rabbit hole looking into his life once I made this connection.

Liked the story of the fathers; Cyrus and his long con, that with considerable self edu..."
I agree. I don't think there is a relationship between asexuality and sociopathy. I think the real issue is lack of empathy or any kind of love for anyone else. When we read this book before, we were all stunned by how progressive he was to write about a woman being so evil. I don't think people really understood sociopathy at that time. I know people who still think we are all born the same and sociopathy is caused solely by a bad childhood. Bad childhoods can contribute or cause it but as he says, "Some people are born bad." What is really insightful of JS is to point out that some people refuse to see it and deal with it properly.

Carol wrote: "Sara wrote: "Mary wrote: "I enjoyed the description of the setting in Chapter 1, I felt I could really visualize Salinas.
Liked the story of the fathers; Cyrus and his long con, that with consider..."
Carol, thank you so much for bringing your insights!
I'm always nervous to discuss a book before I've finished it AND understood the writer's motivations, history, and context. I'm finding it so refreshing to discover a new-to-me book & author alongside such an astute group. Thanks, all!
Liked the story of the fathers; Cyrus and his long con, that with consider..."
Carol, thank you so much for bringing your insights!
I'm always nervous to discuss a book before I've finished it AND understood the writer's motivations, history, and context. I'm finding it so refreshing to discover a new-to-me book & author alongside such an astute group. Thanks, all!

Liked the story of the fathers; Cyrus and his long con, that..."
and believe me, I'm no english scholar. I'm a nurse who studied math and science. I read the cliff notes or whatever to pick up on the symbolism that I missed. And in reading this book, I could see that there were multiple layers.
I love how he interweaves topical essays into the fiction.
I also love how most of us so far are enjoying it so much and some are reading ahead!

I never ..."
I wouldn't read the introduction. I did once for another book and it totally revealed the plot and a surprise I would have liked to enjoyed on my own.

Agree! I also appreciated how his description of the landscape sets the stage for the mythical and Biblical qualities of the characters and their stories. In particular, I keep thinking back to these lines: "And it never failed that during the dry years the people forgot about the rich years, and during the wet years they lost all memory of the dry years. It was always that way". Amazing writing.

Same here. I prefer coming into a new novel with little knowledge of the plot - like to be surprised.

Some parts of this first section that stood out for me:
The lecture that Cyrus gives to Adam about what it means to be a soldier - we take a soldier and put murder in his hands and we say to him, 'Use it well, use it wisely.'
Liza's piety and how she only read the Bible - In that one book she had her history and her poetry, her knowledge of peoples and things, her ethics, her morals, and her salvation. She never studied the Bible or inspected it; she just read it.
And of course the section about monsters as the intro to meeting Cathy - You must not forget that a monster is only a variation, and that to a monster the norm is monstrous.
It's beautifully written too, not at all a difficult read (so far).

I was just reading chapter 7 where Adam spends almost a decade "tramping" around, and it made me think of reading Orwell's diaries. What a time to be alive where you could live that way for a while.


Chapter 7 brought back memories of my Grandpa Carl's stories about tramping and riding the rails as a teenager during the Great Depression. Wish I had recorded his stories.
Ooh and I found this book that I have requested from the library: Journal of a Novel: The East of Eden Letters by John Steinbeck!
One of the things I found most striking about this section is how Steinbeck describes the natural setting at the beginning. Has anyone else looked for images of this area, or have you been there?




I think Scott mentioned this to me and then, of course, I forgot about It. It looks good!


I read East of Eden first and was surprised at the difference in the writing of TGOW too. He wrote East of Eden near the end of his life so I guess his writing had matured. But like you, I still liked TGOW. Much of his work focuses on how there are some people that get chewed up in every society.
Sara wrote: "Okay, Andrew, can we talk about chapter 17 now? Holy moly!"
Technically chapter 17 is not discussed in this thread!
-Your friendly moderator :)
Technically chapter 17 is not discussed in this thread!
-Your friendly moderator :)
Carol wrote: "I read East of Eden first and was surprised at the difference in the writing of TGOW too. He wrote East of Eden near the end of his life so I guess his writing had matured. But like you, I still liked TGOW. Much of his work focuses on how there are some people that get chewed up in every society."
One of the reasons I wanted to read EoE next is that it is from a decade I hadn't read any Steinbeck. Travels with Charley is the 60s, Grapes of Wrath is from the 40s I think, I was interested to see if his style shifted by decade. That might be too simplistic!
One of the reasons I wanted to read EoE next is that it is from a decade I hadn't read any Steinbeck. Travels with Charley is the 60s, Grapes of Wrath is from the 40s I think, I was interested to see if his style shifted by decade. That might be too simplistic!
Jenny (Reading Envy) wrote: "Sara wrote: "Okay, Andrew, can we talk about chapter 17 now? Holy moly!"
Technically chapter 17 is not discussed in this thread!
-Your friendly moderator :)"
Ahaha! Oops! This is why I should avoid Goodreads via iPhone browser. Thanks, friendly moderator! :)
Technically chapter 17 is not discussed in this thread!
-Your friendly moderator :)"
Ahaha! Oops! This is why I should avoid Goodreads via iPhone browser. Thanks, friendly moderator! :)

Technically chapter 17 is not discussed in this thread!
-Your friendly moderator :)"
Ahaha! ..."
Oh no, sorry if i caused the breach😕 Will have to hild our horses!
Andrew wrote: "Sara wrote: "Jenny (Reading Envy) wrote: "Sara wrote: "Okay, Andrew, can we talk about chapter 17 now? Holy moly!"
Technically chapter 17 is not discussed in this thread!
-Your friendly moderator..."
Not at all! I think it was your Litsy post that I was continuing.
Technically chapter 17 is not discussed in this thread!
-Your friendly moderator..."
Not at all! I think it was your Litsy post that I was continuing.

Technically chapter 17 is not discussed in this thread!
-Your fri..."
I hadn't realised that jenny had opened a separate discussion now. I'll try and gather my thoughts before I post there. I'm not sure how I would of 'hilded' my horses anyway!
Books mentioned in this topic
Journal of a Novel: The East of Eden Letters (other topics)Journal of a Novel: The East of Eden Letters (other topics)
George Orwell Diaries (other topics)
Steinbeck starts out with the natural setting, so that deserves some attention.
Then he moves to some characters in two families - the Hamiltons and the Trasks. This might be a good time to share/brag on any creative methods you've come up for tracking characters!
I'm making the executive decision not to require spoiler tags within each weekly discussion. This makes it a bit of an issue for those of us who read with a digest like I do, but please just scroll past. I have learned from other groups that it is too difficult to read stuff behind spoilers if you are using the app. So everything inside week 1 is fair game here!