Stephen King Fans discussion
Movies & TV shows
>
IT Chapter 1 (2017)
message 401:
by
Read me two times
(new)
Dec 17, 2017 09:53AM

reply
|
flag






Really enjoyed the movie Sometimes having kids in a cast can go either way for me but I thought they were all spot on in their roles. Bill Skarsgard, as Pennywise, was even more perfect. I wouldn't be surprised if I started having nightmares about him, he definitely scared me in the role. I am looking forward to the second chapter.

Hi Kandice I agree with you, but it is never that simple I am a step father and I brought up my daughter as if she were my own. She is she is the daughter of my heart. I treat her no different the I would any of my own because she is my own.
I know I am not making sense, but this is what I am trying to say. Accepting someone else's child as your own is difficult. It takes work that a lot of people are unwilling to do. It takes patients and love to spare to be accepted and it can be undone with one word or deed. But the first time they say I love you dad is so special it melts your heart and breaks it at the same time.

I think you misread my statement. I view Al as her father, because he raised her as such. I am completely agreeing with you. If you raise a child and then treat them in a way a child should not be treated, you can't blame it on them NOT being your child. It's ludicrous.

Al IS her father. He didn't adopt her. This misconception comes from a typo by King, because it's only once mentioned that he's not her father. All other instances say he is. Why don't we just put it to rest finally?

That's actually not what we were discussing. We were talking about the fact that it makes no difference if he is her biological father or her step-father. Either way he has raised her and his actions would be no less reprehensible if they didn't share blood. I don't think the typo, if that is indeed what it is, makes any difference at all.




Not my quote but it fits so well here and it is true.


The word "Father" is out of the equation and the word "Guardian" takes its place."
I understand those are your feelings and beliefs, but many of us feel that if you choose to "father" a child (care fro and be responsible for as if you were their biological father) then your actions should be judged as if you were. Child molestation is disgusting, but molesting (or harboring thoughts of) a child you have "fathered" in any way, biologically or by choice, is even MORE disgusting and not sharing DNA does not excuse it or make the action less reprehensible, but more so.


Really enjoyed the movie Sometimes having kids in a cast can go either way for me but I thought they were all spot on in their roles. Bill Skarsgard, ..."
Totally agree Erin. The acting was far superior to the deeply disappointing mini series. The kids in 2017 were amazing. All fantastic in their own different ways.
Bill was simply outstanding and you could tell he had read the novel from back to front and constantly had it on set with him. Something Mr Curry didn't.

But that still doesn't make someone else their Father or Mother.
Caregiver, perhaps. But that's all. ..."
As a religious belief, do you think that Rachel and Leah were not the mothers of their first two sons? Only caretakers?


I am expressing my feelings on this I am a father and as you put it a step father, No I treat my children all of them the same. I love each and every one of them the same no matter what. It is not a difficult thing to grasp. I do not differentiate between them when I introduce my daughter I don't say this is my daughter and this is my step daughter. These are my daughters, My daughter does not introduce me as her step father but her father, I am the only man she knows and that is all that matters to her. o many people get stuck on the actual physical description of the word. I have read this in a book "you are the father of my heart" In reference to a man that raised her as a father should.
We are bound to disagree on this so lets finish this I will respect your opinion and hope you can respect mine. I don't intend any slight I just say things as I see them. Let not detract from others enjoyment of the discussion by getting side tracked on one point in the book.
Still friends? I hope so.


Two things, and I'll leave it at that.
1. Let's please bring this particular discussion back to the topic at hand, which would be the novel/tvshow/movie It. If we need a different topic on parenting or religion, we can make it.
2. Name calling and personal attacks will not be tolerated. We can disagree. We cannot attack based on those disagreements or anything else. Not in this forum, at least.
Further encroachments on this will be dealt with without warning (in effect, this is the warning).I'm not deleting anything at this point in case anyone attacked feels the need to flag/escalate and wishes to refer to actual posts.
That is all.
1. Let's please bring this particular discussion back to the topic at hand, which would be the novel/tvshow/movie It. If we need a different topic on parenting or religion, we can make it.
2. Name calling and personal attacks will not be tolerated. We can disagree. We cannot attack based on those disagreements or anything else. Not in this forum, at least.
Further encroachments on this will be dealt with without warning (in effect, this is the warning).
That is all.

http://ew.com/movies/2018/02/20/jessi...
I think this would bode well for the second half of the story.
Maybe my post was missed in all of that. I'll lock down the thread for a little bit and that should alert everyone involved.
I'll unlock it shortly so we can get back to the topic. Thanks, Nate and Lauren for attempting to do so.
I'll unlock it shortly so we can get back to the topic. Thanks, Nate and Lauren for attempting to do so.

Linda wrote: "Well Chris you go right ahead and delete me but I will stand up for not bullying people into their beliefs."
You did that, and I really have no problem there. All I'm trying to do now is stop the argument, which has run its course and does not need to keep dragging out in this group/thread.
You did that, and I really have no problem there. All I'm trying to do now is stop the argument, which has run its course and does not need to keep dragging out in this group/thread.


I haven't read the book in a long time so I only remember bits of it. I remember Ben's poem (which I'm glad made an appearance) and I remember Ben's dam (which I'm disappointed that it didn't). I don't remember Bev (view spoiler)
As for the mini-series, I remember not liking it when I watched it in the past.

I haven't..."
Wow... Bev? Didn't you think she was a little bit more grown-up than the rest of the gang?

Yes, Bev was a bit more mature, but at that age, between 10 and 12, girls are always more ma..."
Actually, now that you mention it, you're right... and they're often taller too.

Yes, Bev was a bit more mature, but at that age, between..."
Of course, what do I know, I went to an all-boys Catholic military grade school. My sister (a year younger than I was) never hit 5 feet. But she was definitely the toughest kid on the block. Once a neighborhood kid knocked me down, and before I could even get up again, she came out of nowhere and beat the crap out of him.

The movie ruined it for me by also making her a bit too sexually mature for a 12 year old. She practically had Mr. Keene wanting to leap over the counter.

The movie ruined it for me by also making her a bit too sexually mature for a 12 year ol..."
I don't think it was dramatically sexual at all. Flirtatious and playing to his vanity but not very sexual at all.


Yes, it is a little strange that she's more mature than her age. But other than that, I think she did a phenomenal job.

That’s...a really strange interpretation. I think that bit was designed to show how creepy Keene was, like so many of other adults who were affected by Pennywise and Derry’s evil. None of that was Bev’s fault. And especially when it was implied that her father was sexually interested in her, that’s...yeah, that interpretation feels a little gross to me.

Yes, it is a little strange that she's more mature than her age. But other than that, I thi..."
I think the reasoning behind Bev's more mature looks was really just good old Hollywood casting. They wanted to make her sexy so they cast a gal who looked somewhere between 15 and 20 for the part.
Books mentioned in this topic
It (other topics)It (other topics)
It (other topics)
It (other topics)