Question I

[Jonetta]

When Sam has the opportunity to kill Nader, he refrains until his life is threatened. Your thoughts about this scene?

[Anita]

I will admit that I would have wasted him without a second thought. The man was evil and would have bought his way out through the legal system.

[Jonetta]

I was really proud he didn't stoop to that level because it would have changed him. He shouldn't have let Nader get the drop on him, though.

[Charlene]

I was holding my breath through this scene!

[Laura]

I thought it commendable. I wish Nader would have had a more tortured death though.

[Jonetta]

I thought about that too, Laura. But then I considered that his end came after being chased like the rat he was and he was a sniveling coward at that moment. He saw his right hand man taken out and lost the diamonds. So, he died powerless and that was good enough for me that this arrogant thug died on the side of the road with no tires.

[Anita]

Torture is overrated. Just put a bullet in the brain and be done with it. Dead is Dead and that is the ending you want. If you play around with torture you leave time for your victim to escape or be rescued.

[Laura]

I would have liked a few fingers chopped off at least lol

[Quynh]

I was surprised he hesitated considering killing Nader has been his end goal. Maybe he didn't want another death on his conscience, but I also thought Nader had an easy way out. He should've suffered more.

[Anita]

It's the tyranny of the honorable man. Nader had to die, but Sam couldn't just execute him because Sam is an honorable man. He just couldn't kill any man in cold blood.

[Jonetta]

What's that saying...be careful that you don't become the monsters you chase? That's what I thought of when he was faced with the choice to kill him without it being self defense.