Books on the Nightstand discussion

104 views
Single or multiples?

Comments Showing 1-22 of 22 (22 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Maggie (new)

Maggie | 32 comments I have always been a one book at a time reader. I completely finish one book before starting another. Lately I have been debating about having more than one book going at a time. I am wondering if I would be able to get through more books on my To Be Read list if I had two books going at once. Any advice from readers who make a habit of reading multiple books at a time? Do you feel you read more books than when you focus on a single book at a time? Besides picking books from two separate genres, are there any strategies to enjoying and keeping books separate when reading multiple books?


message 2: by Gerald (new)

Gerald Miller | 821 comments I usually listen to one book at work and read a different book at home. I h


message 3: by Gerald (new)

Gerald Miller | 821 comments I have tried reading and listening to the same book via Amazon and Audible. My hours are not normal so that really hurts my reading. I just read what I like and stay away from genres. I am not sure how people read five or six books a week. I figure they are retired or single or very fast readers.


message 4: by Amy (new)

Amy (amybf) | 144 comments I always read more than one book at a time. Always at least one fiction and one nonfiction. That allows me to jump back and forth between genres depending on my mood/interest of the moment. I don't do it to rack up a higher total of books read--I just do it because sometimes I feel like reading nonfiction and at other times I want something a bit less challenging on which I don't have to focus as much.


message 5: by Sue (new)

Sue | 415 comments I usually have a print book, an ebook and an audiobook going at the same time. Audiobooks are for my commute to work (2+ hours a day in the car) and the print and ebooks are for home or when I'm waiting somewhere (doctor, kid's actvities, etc.)


message 6: by Denise (new)

Denise (tetkla) | 4 comments I read at least two at a time. e-book when commuting by bus and one at home. I confess I often juggle two or three at home.


message 7: by Adore (new)

Adore i can't read more than two (one fiction and one nonfiction) or it feels like bad multitasking and i don't enjoy any of them. however, i love reading one short story a day and then continuing whatever novel/nf i'm reading before bed. i'm now learning that i don't have the attention span for audible books despite binging on podcasts regularly! i am super jealous of those who can listen to books since it seems efficient and has the fun performance aspect.


message 8: by melodie (new)

melodie b | 308 comments I read at least 3 at A time but sometimes 5 books


message 9: by Kalen (new)

Kalen | 218 comments I am typically monogamous (aside from whatever Classics/Impossibles book I may or may not have going) but lately I have had several books going at one time and I don't like it. I can't focus on any of them and I feel like I am racing through each to get to the next one.


message 10: by Melissa (new)

Melissa (thenovelbutterfly) | 101 comments When I graduated from college I made a pact with myself I would only read one book at a time. Having been an English major always juggling numerous pieces of literature at a time, I was done trying not to confuse stories, characters, plot devices, etc! I do however often have one audiobook going and one print book. I've been listening to the Flavia deLuce stories.


message 11: by Maggie (new)

Maggie | 32 comments Kalen wrote: "I am typically monogamous (aside from whatever Classics/Impossibles book I may or may not have going) but lately I have had several books going at one time and I don't like it. I can't focus on any..."

When I think about attempting to read more than one book at a time, my concern is exactly what you mentioned.... Not focusing on any of them, racing through and not enjoying them.


message 12: by Maggie (new)

Maggie | 32 comments Denise wrote: "I read at least two at a time. e-book when commuting by bus and one at home. I confess I often juggle two or three at home."

I have never considered reading a book and an e-book at the same time. That might help me delineate the two novels. I don't think I would have more than two going at once. I have a short attention span for nonfiction but might be able to get through nonfiction a bit easier if I was able to break it up with fiction.


message 13: by Linda (new)

Linda | 3099 comments Mod
I always have several books going. I just recently started with 2 audio books as well as 2 physical books. I have an audio in the car, one on either my iPad or iPod, a book in the "library" at home and one I take with me wherever I go.

I don't have trouble keeping the books separate but I don't usually read all the same genre or kind of book.

I understand that many people can not do what I do or don't care to, I've thought they might get through books faster since their entire effort is concentrated on one book.


message 14: by Marianmar (new)

Marianmar | 1 comments I was always a one-book-at-a-time kinda girl. Then sometime back in '92 or '93, when I started to listen to audiobooks, I changed to multiples - one for the car, one for the house, and one paperback. I'm still pretty much the same, except the paperback is replaced with e-book ;-)


message 15: by Sarah (new)

Sarah (bazilli) | 13 comments 100% multiple. I can't imagine just reading one book at a time!


message 16: by Cindy (new)

Cindy (cwsmith) | 104 comments Ditto to Sarah's comment. I can't imagine reading one book at a time. I am a "mood" reader ... sometimes I want just the facts (non-fiction); sometimes I want to be someone else (biography); sometimes I want to escape reality (light fiction); sometimes I want a brain workout (literary fiction); sometimes I need something to put me to sleep (hmm..not sure of a category here). I don't think this multiplicity allows me to read more books over a period of time. It just allows me to find the right book for my current mood or circumstance.

I have noticed I shouldn't read (include audio here) two books that are too much of the same genre (i.e. two British mysteries). The one time I did this, I had to keep a character list on a post-it in the front of the book to keep everyone between the right covers!!

I don't believe monogamy or multiplicity is inherently the "right" or "wrong" way to read. We are all different in our reading styles, tastes, reasons why we read. Celebrate our differences!!


message 17: by Cory Day (new)

Cory Day (cors36) | 67 comments I think whether or not multiple books helps you read more would depend on how and why you're reading. Like others have said, I use multiple books for a number of reasons, but it started with wanting to read non-fiction but feeling like I was just slogging through to get to the next novel. So now I keep a non-fiction book at home and space it out over weeks or months while reading multiple novels. Then Audible made audiobooks convenient. I don't do that well with focusing on audiobooks, so I save them for rereads - I don't need to pay as much attention when I already know the plot. Then ebooks came, and I realized that in moderation I can even read on my phone if necessary. So I usually have at least one going for traveling and when I'm out and about. Then I discovered graphic novels, so sometimes I'll throw one of those in too. Finally, if I'm reading a work of fiction frat is going slowly, I'll read a plotty book (or more) to avoid moving through the slower one too quickly.

All of this means I usually have at least 2-3 books going at a time, but that's just my way. It has inadvertently become confusing before - sometimes patterns emerge that I'm not aware of choosing.


message 18: by Amy (last edited Jun 03, 2014 06:45AM) (new)

Amy (amybf) | 144 comments Cory (Bigler) '00-'05 wrote: "All of this means I usually have at least 2-3 books going at a time, but that's just my way. It has inadvertently become confusing before - sometimes patterns emerge that I'm not aware of choosing.
..."


Very true. As I mentioned, I am always reading a fiction and a nonfiction. I've found that often the nonfiction book will gradually begin dictating the fiction that I choose. For instance, when I was reading No Ordinary Time: Franklin and Eleanor Roosevelt: The Home Front in World War II by Doris Kearns Goodwin, I started gravitating toward historical fiction set in the time period of WWII. It was interesting to get different takes on the same events --and I found that reading the nonfiction simultaneously helped provide a deeper understanding of what was actually going on at the time when the fictional characters were being portrayed. I felt as though I got a fuller, richer experience out of my fiction reads because they were being supplemented by the nonfiction.


message 19: by Dree (new)

Dree I always have at least 2 books going, more often than not 3. I have Oyster on my phone, and always have a book and a short story collection both going on there--sometimes I read these at home, but mostly when I am waiting for kids, standing in line at the post office, etc.

At home I usually have a novel and/or play, as well as a nonfiction. I get virtually all of my books from the library, so sometimes I read one physical book at a time because it came form my queue and I won't be able to return it.

I don't do audiobooks--I have tried (last time was 2 months ago), but I can't follow the storyline and tend to get confused about who is narrating, etc. And I lose my place in the book when I pause it and come back (this is Overdrive, for library books).

When I am cooking and cleaning I listen to podcasts ;)


message 20: by Gayle (new)

Gayle (gaylebn) | 118 comments I usually have 3 books going at any one time. An audiobook, and on my Nook - a novel and a non-fiction. I am impressed with those of you who can handle several at one time.


message 21: by Sarah (new)

Sarah Bramlett | 15 comments I am also a one book at a time person. I can't read more than one because I often find myself sucked into one and don't want to do anything but read it. I just read The Fault In Our Stars by John Green and it took me literally a day. I was almost late to church because I could not stop reading it.


message 22: by Linda (new)

Linda | 3099 comments Mod
Sarah wrote: "I am also a one book at a time person. I can't read more than one because I often find myself sucked into one and don't want to do anything but read it. I just read The Fault In Our Stars by John G..."

I saw a review of the movie this morning that used the word "perfect".


back to top