Books on the Nightstand discussion
Single or multiples?
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Maggie
(new)
Jun 02, 2014 11:16AM

reply
|
flag








When I think about attempting to read more than one book at a time, my concern is exactly what you mentioned.... Not focusing on any of them, racing through and not enjoying them.

I have never considered reading a book and an e-book at the same time. That might help me delineate the two novels. I don't think I would have more than two going at once. I have a short attention span for nonfiction but might be able to get through nonfiction a bit easier if I was able to break it up with fiction.
I always have several books going. I just recently started with 2 audio books as well as 2 physical books. I have an audio in the car, one on either my iPad or iPod, a book in the "library" at home and one I take with me wherever I go.
I don't have trouble keeping the books separate but I don't usually read all the same genre or kind of book.
I understand that many people can not do what I do or don't care to, I've thought they might get through books faster since their entire effort is concentrated on one book.
I don't have trouble keeping the books separate but I don't usually read all the same genre or kind of book.
I understand that many people can not do what I do or don't care to, I've thought they might get through books faster since their entire effort is concentrated on one book.


I have noticed I shouldn't read (include audio here) two books that are too much of the same genre (i.e. two British mysteries). The one time I did this, I had to keep a character list on a post-it in the front of the book to keep everyone between the right covers!!
I don't believe monogamy or multiplicity is inherently the "right" or "wrong" way to read. We are all different in our reading styles, tastes, reasons why we read. Celebrate our differences!!

All of this means I usually have at least 2-3 books going at a time, but that's just my way. It has inadvertently become confusing before - sometimes patterns emerge that I'm not aware of choosing.

..."
Very true. As I mentioned, I am always reading a fiction and a nonfiction. I've found that often the nonfiction book will gradually begin dictating the fiction that I choose. For instance, when I was reading No Ordinary Time: Franklin and Eleanor Roosevelt: The Home Front in World War II by Doris Kearns Goodwin, I started gravitating toward historical fiction set in the time period of WWII. It was interesting to get different takes on the same events --and I found that reading the nonfiction simultaneously helped provide a deeper understanding of what was actually going on at the time when the fictional characters were being portrayed. I felt as though I got a fuller, richer experience out of my fiction reads because they were being supplemented by the nonfiction.

At home I usually have a novel and/or play, as well as a nonfiction. I get virtually all of my books from the library, so sometimes I read one physical book at a time because it came form my queue and I won't be able to return it.
I don't do audiobooks--I have tried (last time was 2 months ago), but I can't follow the storyline and tend to get confused about who is narrating, etc. And I lose my place in the book when I pause it and come back (this is Overdrive, for library books).
When I am cooking and cleaning I listen to podcasts ;)


Sarah wrote: "I am also a one book at a time person. I can't read more than one because I often find myself sucked into one and don't want to do anything but read it. I just read The Fault In Our Stars by John G..."
I saw a review of the movie this morning that used the word "perfect".
I saw a review of the movie this morning that used the word "perfect".