Constant Reader discussion
note: This topic has been closed to new comments.
Short Form
>
What I'm Reading JUNE 2014
date
newest »

message 151:
by
Nicole
(new)
Jun 25, 2014 11:03AM

reply
|
flag

They are kind of d..."
To defend Adichie, it's not like she could invent the details of the Biafran war. She might have tacked some sort of fake happy ending onto that novel, but that would have been an aesthetic cheat.

I discovered this series about 20 years ago, by accident, and have followed it since. It is entirely possible I'm tiring of it. This is the 8th in the series, and I'm about 75% through it. I can't say I'm terribly impressed. Considering readers had a 5 year wait in-between I'd have thought there would be something new. There isn't. Maybe the last 25% will be more satisfying. I hope.

I like this Norwegian writer.

I've read a few of Nesbo's books, and enjoyed his writing. He can be rather dark though.


So true. But I keep reading these books also ... and also with considerable time between the books.







THE STORIED LIFE OF A. J. FIKRY by Gabrielle Zevin.
The book description is so right in saying this enchanting novel is a love letter to the world of books.
Marge


Glad to see you liked The Son. I'm adding it to my list.
I finished Nesbo's The Redeemer yesterday. I was disappointed. Another needlessly gruesome murder, and a couple of pscychopaths to boot. Of course, if you have a psychopath, you don't need to explain everything he/she does because such a character is not rational in a conventional sense.
Also, it would be nice to see Harry Hole have a little happiness in his personal life. Rakel and her son Oleg didn't really figure in this one. I like the Oleg/Harry interaction most. It makes Harry human.
If Harry can't develop and change more as a person, Nesbo needs to move on. I'm glad he did so in the book you read.





I am reading another Wharton, The Custom of the Country, it is even better that The Age of Innocence.

I am reading another Wharton, The Custom of the Country, it is even better th..."
Custom of the Country is one of my very favorite books, Carol.

Cateline, I thought that book was excellent. I didn't always agree , but it certainly has some validity. It made me aware of what I do today has long term repercussions for the future, and the people who will live there.


I am reading another Wharton, The Custom of the Country, it is even better th..."
My favorite Wharton. It was an official read a few years back. My nom.

For me, also, there's a distance thing that kicks in for me. I think it has to do with the illusion of control, or possibly fiction as a means of engagement. A depressing story about a place I live now, even if I really can't do anything about it, reads a lot differently than a depressing story about a far-away place. Somehow if the problem is close to home, the book about it is comforting or a solace or something. An engagement. Or maybe it's a substitute for real engagement, which would be bad (though it doesn't feel bad when you're reading it, which is maybe the worst part of it).
But reading about terrible, terrible events that take place far away doesn't offer that, it just imports a whole new level of depression into my life, and makes me feel like hopeless and helpless or something. So, while I do think that books are a really important entrée into culture, and allow you to experience something truly foreign, the Biafran story was just way way way over my personal line. Weirdly, though, the events of something like Midnight's Children did not make me feel horrible and depressed, and I can't really figure out the difference. Maybe the Adichie is closer to non-fiction? Or maybe it's that I feel like a tourist in the misery if the book isn't ostentatiously fictionalized in some way?
Ugh. In writing this I seem to have discovered that I like to learn happy things about foreign countries, but am apparently the kind of reader who would rather not hear about genocide. So there you go.

That puts it in the worst possible way! And though I'm not sure where you live, I'm guessing there is no genocide "close to home", so there really is a difference in scale.
I'm wondering if part of how I feel reading about depressing events has to do with the author's attitude. Some writers when they write about evil seem to suggest there's nothing we can do about it and despair is the appropriate reaction. Others seem to call us to action. Some assert that there is good in the world and life is worth hanging onto in spite of the horrific reality they have just portrayed. For me, I think author attitude is crucial in whether I can stomach a depressing book. Though there are probably books out there I couldn't get through just on a too-much-empathy basis.
What's happening in my own life at the time also makes a difference. At the moment my siblings and I are going through decision making and changes with regard to my mom and her long-time companion, and there's a lot of grief and pain in play. I'm curious about other people, at such times do you go right on reading what you've been reading? Quit reading altogether? Or turn to light reading? I've tried to do the last but just quit the comic baseball novel I was reading after a ballplayer microwaved a cat. Ha ha ha. Now I'm reading a sort of time travel/fairy tale romance written for teens. It's not quite right either. The search for the right light reading goes on...
This topic has been frozen by the moderator. No new comments can be posted.
Books mentioned in this topic
The Custom of the Country (other topics)The Burgess Boys (other topics)
The World Without Us (other topics)
The Custom of the Country (other topics)
The Burgess Boys (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Isabel Allende (other topics)Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie (other topics)
M.L. Stedman (other topics)
M.L. Stedman (other topics)