Reading the Detectives discussion
Group Challenges
>
The Body in the Library - SPOILER Thread


For me, it does spoil it. I grabbed it in 2015 and sat in a pontoon boat moared at the dock, and read. Then ran up to the house, grabbed a glass of wine, returned to boat to continue reading. Such a lovely day,
If I can figure out the ending in any mystery, I'm disappointed. I may read one more by that author. If I continue to figure it out, I'm done.

You figured out who did it in The Body In The Library, how it was done, and the motive? You figured out everything? Which mysteries by Christie did you guess whodunit?

You figured out who did it in The B..."
No I didn't figure it out the first time I read it. I only remembered a few things on the second reading. I was talking about being disappointed in mysteries, in general, when I can figure it out in response to post no. 3

Ok, gotcha :)
As with so many of these Golden Age mysteries, one of the joys for me is the portrait of a long gone era. I really enjoyed the section in the Majestic Hotel at Danemouth. I was also interested when the butler/valet is interviewed, who works for Conway Jefferson and he mentions that he didn't leave the room much and venture downstairs. So, if you were a servant and went away, you were still very much working and not really given any extra time off to explore yourself. It made me think that even if you worked for someone very wealthy, who went off to the Riviera, say, you didn't really see anything yourself...

As far as this one goes, you will not that Miss M uses a trick to catch the guilty, much as she did in Vicarage. In fact, there was a good bit of similarity between the two, if you think about the solution. Since they were written so many years apart, perhaps she thought no one would notice.
Yes, that is a good point, Pghfan. Of course, there were 12 years between books and I suspect that Agatha Christie did not imagine that people would be reading and discussing her work so many years after it was written!

As far as this one goes, you will not that Miss M uses a trick to catch the guilty, much as she did in Vicarage. In f..."
I agree there's similarities. Miss Marple seems more developed to me in this book.
I would agree, Deborah. She seems a really complete character by this novel, doesn't she? There are a number of short stories, and one novel, before this and you get the feeling her character is complete in Christie's mind.


The book was written twelve years later but the characters themselves are only a few months or so further on - otherwise by the end of the series I dread to think how old Miss Marple would be!

The Body In The Library was published 12 years after Murder At the Vicarage in the real world but maybe after Murder At the Vicarage in "book years" not that much time has passed so that could account for Griselda's child still being small. In 1957 when 4:50 From Paddington is published, Griselda's son is a young teenager. Let's say that by the time of The Body In The Library Griselda's son is 1 years old. Well by 1957 (if Christie counted the years between 1942-1957 and decided to be consistent and accurate, instead of going by merely "book years" as I referred to earlier) Leonard would be 15 years old, the right years considered a teenager. We can safely assume that by the progression of the books and towards the end of the series Leonard would have been a grown man. But unfortunately neither Griselda and Leonard are never mentioned again.

Possibly the short stories, written over time, helped keep the character fresh in her mind? I am sure she kept notes - or perhaps she didn't! I really need to read a proper biography about her, as I have read some of her memoirs, but she didn't really discuss her writing much in the book that I read. It was more about her life with her second husband and that focused on his work, rather than hers.

Yes, I would like to read "Notebooks..." and also a book about her disappearance, which is so intriguing.

I suppose if Christie were going to make Miss Marple a central character in a series, she had to make her a little more active.
I also liked the way that Mrs Bantry was so concerned about her husband and indignant that he would be blamed.
I also liked the way that Mrs Bantry was so concerned about her husband and indignant that he would be blamed.
Yes - I also like the way Mrs Bantry starts out by thinking it might be "fun", like a murder mystery in a novel, but then gradually realises how awful the reality really is. Interesting how often GA murder mysteries include comments about murder mysteries - like "if this was in a book", etc.

Not so much - I mean while it is better when one doesn't remember it because of the surprise element, I do still enjoy the whole denouement- especially in AC.

You figured out who did it in The B..."
Only in one (I've forgotten which by now), I had guessed part of the plot but not the who. But with Christie, one hardly ever manages to- she gets you thinking on a completely different track despite putting in clues that point you (or should point you) in the right direction.

As far as this one goes, you will not that Miss M uses a trick to catch the guilty, much as she did in..."
In this one, she's more the Miss Marple we 'know'- in the Vicarage, she did as everyone else pointed out feel like a different person.

I also liked the way that Mrs Bantry was so concerned about her hus..."
Else she'd have ended up like Mycroft :)


Dr Who had an interesting explanation for that :)
I never suspected Colonel Bantry - he just seemed too obvious. Although, he did have to change his tyre or something on the way back home, so his alibi was suspect.

I didn't either but was wondering after I finished the book whether this was because one 'knew' him from reading the Thirteen Problems..
That is true, Lady Clementina. He just did not seem the type - besides, why would you strangle a blonde and then just leave her on the rug? Wouldn't you try to hide the body?

True- he wouldn't have simply left her there unless he had some complicated plan in his mind to pin it on someone else.
Which is, in fact, what happened - just by somebody else and more a panicked response than a complicated plan...

One wonders what would have happened if Basil hadn't been quite so drunk

I thought Jefferson killed her the first time I read the book: after being told he would be angry to learn Ruby wasn't "innocent" I thought he would find out she had a boyfriend.
after reading the threads, I plan to read 13 Problems next.
If Basil hadn't been quite so drunk, he may easily have found himself on trial for murder. Even though the body was not found in his house, he was the obvious suspect.
I've just watched the ITV adaptation of this - I actually meant to watch the Joan Hickson version but couldn't find that one online, so downloaded the more recent version from Amazon.
I liked Geraldine McEwan as Miss Marple, plus the star-studded cast in general, but the hotel seemed amazingly glamorous and expensive - gorgeous to look at, but not at all what I'd imagined from the book!
Also, I was a bit taken aback by the fact that the ending is changed - I know there was a warning about this during our discussion last month, but I'd forgotten about it! Apart from the changed ending, which I won't give away to avoid spoiling the show for anyone who watches it, I thought most of the episode was fairly true to the book and I did enjoy it.
I liked Geraldine McEwan as Miss Marple, plus the star-studded cast in general, but the hotel seemed amazingly glamorous and expensive - gorgeous to look at, but not at all what I'd imagined from the book!
Also, I was a bit taken aback by the fact that the ending is changed - I know there was a warning about this during our discussion last month, but I'd forgotten about it! Apart from the changed ending, which I won't give away to avoid spoiling the show for anyone who watches it, I thought most of the episode was fairly true to the book and I did enjoy it.

That of course- but I meant as to the body- how would he have chosen to dealt with it, gone to the police (which would have got him in trouble) or disposed of it some other way (which would also have the same effect)
Hmmm, now where else would he have left it? The vicarage again would have looked very suspicious on poor Leonard. I think that would have been my choice, had I been Basil.

Think of all the "fun" the old ladies would have had with that.
I love the way the network of news spreads around the village too - maids seem extremely important in helping the grapevine work.
Yes, the gossipy atmosphere is very well done - I'm just reading the next book, The Moving Finger, and it's also the case there, in a different village!
The Body in the Library was published in 1942. Please feel free to post spoilers in this thread, but not in the general discussion thread for the book. Thank you.