The Mookse and the Gripes discussion

62 views

Comments Showing 1-20 of 20 (20 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Trevor (new)

Trevor (mookse) | 1865 comments Mod
Okay, I need to change the description of this group to something cool and, well, descriptive of the group. I can think of nothing! It must be turned over to you all, then, and I will give books to whoever comes up with the best!

Some things to keep in mind:

-The folders (i.e., this is not just for the Booker and not just for literature in translation, though obviously those both play a large role)
-The personality of the group. I feel we are pleasant and vigorous, but I'd love to hear more here.

That's really about it. The winner can select a few books from my overflowing library.

Feel free to post questions and comments here. I have no deadline. I guess a week or two or more if we need time. Post ideas here and feel free to modify and polish. This "contest" has been thrown together quickly, so also feel free to let me know of any holes in the process that I should address.

Thanks in advance! Please help!


message 2: by Dan (new)

Dan Here's a preliminary suggestion: "Forum for devoted and informed readers eager to engage in spirited and convivial discussions of late 20th and 21st century fiction, with particular focus on fiction recognized through UK, international, and other nation-specific prizes."

I'm undecided about including "informed," since I don't want to sound exclusionary (see Tonymess' good-by post). My intent is to discourage the types of posts often seen on some LibraryThing and Goodreads groups, often limited to recapping plots or highly abbreviated comments to the effect that "I didn't like this novel because I didn't like the main character." Self-selection may naturally take care of this potential problem.


message 3: by Trevor (new)

Trevor (mookse) | 1865 comments Mod
That's so much better than anything I'd come up with!

I see your point. I'd also like people to feel safe here and that they don't necessarily have to be anything other than interested.

I'll keep this going for a bit longer! That said, if people want to simply add to Dan's suggestion, we'll give Dan the prize but will appreciate any suggestions to adjust and polish.


message 4: by Nicole (new)

Nicole | 115 comments Dan wrote: "My intent is to discourage the types of posts often seen on some LibraryThing and Goodreads groups, often limited to recapping plots or highly abbreviated comments to the effect that "I didn't like this novel because I didn't like the main character.""

Word. These make me nuts.

In other news, how about adding "or to observe such discussions"? to the first sentence? Unless you actually have a participation requirement, and lots of groups do, it might be nice to expressly welcome lurkers and listeners.

I know that I joined with lurking in mind, and if we weren't now reading books from 1978, I might never have really started participating. But I got (and get) a lot out of the group nonetheless, not least other people's discussions of the shortlisted books, which function for me as a sorting tool. I think there's a real value in the group for people who don't necessarily post very often.


message 5: by Ang (new)

Ang | 1685 comments To cope with both suggestions and not make it longer, you could just remove the phrase "eager to engage in spirited and convival discussions"

and probably also remove "and informed"

So,

"Forum for devoted readers of late 20th and 21st century fiction, with particular focus on fiction recognized through UK, international, and other nation-specific prizes"

Forum implies discussion so you don't have to say there will be discussion, or to describe the type of discussion, thus allowing those who are less "spirited".


message 6: by Dan (new)

Dan I happily cede all editing to Trevor, Nicole, and Ang and their finely honed red pencils. I do think that it would be helpful to include a few words about M&G group character and expectations, no matter how loose and informal.


message 7: by Trevor (new)

Trevor (mookse) | 1865 comments Mod
This is coming along nicely, and I really appreciate the help!

I agree with Ang's short and sweet tone, though, like Dan, I think some injection of the forum spirit is nice. I may leave in "spirited and convivial" in some way.


message 8: by Trevor (new)

Trevor (mookse) | 1865 comments Mod
If there are other ideas, or disagreements, please feel free to voice them!


message 9: by Ang (new)

Ang | 1685 comments Yes, I agree with spirited and convival. You could just add a further sentence which says "Lurkers welcome".


message 10: by Nicole (new)

Nicole | 115 comments Ang wrote: "Yes, I agree with spirited and convival. You could just add a further sentence which says "Lurkers welcome"."

This sounds perfect to me; spirited and convivial sums up the best features of the discussions I've seen here.


message 11: by Trevor (new)

Trevor (mookse) | 1865 comments Mod
Okay -- I feel good calling this. Thanks to Dan for putting the overall structure together, and thanks to all of you who have contributed to polishing it up. I'll make the change soon!

Dan, I'll send you a list of books to choose from. They will all be unmarked, unread books in new condition! Thank you!


message 12: by Dan (new)

Dan You're welcome, Trevor.


message 13: by Karen (new)

Karen (bookertalk) | 41 comments In essence this is a mission statement - a short statement that explains why the group exists. The best statements are short. There is always a temptation to add more words but that only serves to,dilute the point. If you want to see what I mean watch this short video https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=LJhG3HZ... I wouldn't add anything. I would take out two words that to mean don't add value - devoted and particular. The first makes it sound like a clique. The second is redundant since you already say focus. .


message 14: by Trevor (new)

Trevor (mookse) | 1865 comments Mod
Here's what I went with when I made the change yesterday:

Forum for spirited and convivial discussion of 20th and 21st century fiction from around the world, with particular focus on fiction recognized in US, UK, international, and other nation-specific prizes.


message 15: by Karen (new)

Karen (bookertalk) | 41 comments Hm, I see lots of ideas in there but its very long


message 16: by Trevor (new)

Trevor (mookse) | 1865 comments Mod
I'm not really looking for a mission statement, though. We're not marketing the forum; we're trying to describe it. I'm not sure we can adequately do that in shorter form, and brevity isn't my central goal.

I'm still open to ideas and polish, and we may tweak it from time to time, but I will say that the contest is Dan's and I owe him a prize.


message 17: by MisterHobgoblin (new)

MisterHobgoblin Friendly discussion of prize-worthy books


message 18: by Nicole (new)

Nicole | 115 comments Trevor wrote: "I'm not really looking for a mission statement, though. We're not marketing the forum; we're trying to describe it. I'm not sure we can adequately do that in shorter form, and brevity isn't my cent..."

I like it as is, and I think it's plenty short. In fact, it's one of the shortest group descriptions I've ever seen. It's one sentence long. And it's not one of those proustian nightmare sentences that go on for pages until you just want to put a fork in your own eye, it's a perfectly reasonable english sentence.

This will show that kids get off my lawn side that is getting bigger and bigger in recent years, but it does seem odd to suggest on a site ostensibly dedicated to people who love reading that something this short has too much text.


message 19: by Antonomasia, Admin only (new)

Antonomasia | 2668 comments Mod
Yeah, I think it's fine. People need to get an idea of what the group is about. It doesn't need to fit on one line on a billboard or a company letterhead.
I liked the "lurkers welcome" bit too, as there are groups that will remove non participating members, for no reason I can fathom, and it sounds less formal than the rest.


message 20: by MisterHobgoblin (new)

MisterHobgoblin I am with Karen on this - a novel is something you choose to read, albeit often based on a snappy line on the cover to hook you. If we want to encourage people to join in (and why else would you need to describe the forum?), the hook line needs to be short and eye-catching. Save the sub-clauses for once you have caught your reader.


back to top