2-3-4 Challenge Book Discussions #1 discussion

This topic is about
Who Buries the Dead
Who Buries the Dead
>
Question D
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Jonetta
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars
Oct 22, 2016 02:16PM

reply
|
flag


I asked my husband about this and he said that it was the joint action of beheading and placing the head on a pike in a strategic location that was the custom. It was supposed to be a deterrent for others considering rebellion and to show the "spoils" of war. It became so customary that failure to do so would have people question whether the person had actually been slain.
Still a pretty beastly practice.
Still a pretty beastly practice.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simon_F...

Yes, I noticed that. Strange...

What I remember reading about the history of executions is that the public nature of execution and the extreme violence (drawing and quartering--yeeks!) is that it was symbolic of the power of the monarch--sort of a stand in for martial power. So it was kind of like law-breaking was not about breaking so abstract set of rules, but rather doing something that was a personal attack on the Monarch (and on God), and therefore, just as in a battle your body might be brutalized for having stood out against the Ruler, so by breaking the law, your body was similarly vulnerable. That's why there weren't really "prisons" but dungeons which housed prisoners of all types. The Enlightenment changed a lot of that and introduced the idea of the possibility of reform. Strangely, I think the guillotine was first introduced as a more humane method of punishing people of capital crimes because it was supposed to be instantaneous.
