Georgette Heyer Fans discussion
This topic is about
The Conqueror
Group Reads
>
The Conqueror Group Read Oct 2016 Parts 4 - Epilogue
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Carol She's So Novel꧁꧂ , Madam Mod
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars
Oct 01, 2016 11:29AM
Mod
reply
|
flag
*
Mod
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matilda...
message 3:
by
Carol She's So Novel꧁꧂ , Madam Mod
(last edited Oct 13, 2016 12:52PM)
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars
Mod
I must say, I didn't remember this book having quite so many fictional characters as it does. I found male friendship and trust a very important secondary theme - in fact for me it was the best part of the book.
Mod
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/artic...
Gives the full impact of the Saxon's march!
i managed to finish it but it was very heavy going. more battles and conversqtions about battles, and raoul and his beau signeur got on my nerves. not one of her best.
Mod
Interesting. I really like Raoul.
I'm going to go out on a limb here & say it looks like I'm the only one who enjoyed this reading of the book! :D
More information about events around the 950 year anniversary.
http://www.kentlive.news/what-s-on-fo...
Daytime fireworks??? But some of the other things offered sound interesting.
I liked Raoul as well and I was glad he and Elfrida got married - the book itself I found heavy work but not so heavy as to put me off reading her other historicals.
Mod
I found the symbolism in their final scene a bit heavy handed and awkward though.
Carol ♛ Type, Oh Queen! ♛ wrote: "Louise wrote: "i managed to finish it but it was very heavy going. more battles and conversqtions about battles, and raoul and his beau signeur got on my nerves. not one of her best."Interesting...."
i never find doglike devotion an attrqctive quality.
Mod
I didn't find Raoul's loyalty dog like. He remonstrated with William at least once. He was another of GH's "sweet" heroes - Raoul not William! - & I do like them.
I like Raoul, except at the end where he goes all caveman on Elfrida, poor girl. The central relationships in the book are not romantic, though. They are the ones between Raoul and William, and Raoul and Edgar. The first is one of mutual respect but is never one of equals. The second, however, is a true friendship, even when war divides them. William is presented as a real hero, although certainly with his flaws. The most interesting aspect to me was his strategic mind and innovative methods of waging war. The archers, the way he drew his enemy in to fight on his turf and his terms -- brilliant, and obviously techniques that every military leaders since has used. I was strongly reminded of Wellington -- I believe that in The Spanish Bride and An Infamous Army, GH stresses how he always wanted to choose the scene of battle rather than be drawn after the enemy.
Mod
Oh yes! As I said above awkward symbolism & so clumsily written.
Great analysis Elza. I'd love to read a historical from Harold's POV. If anyone knows a good one, put it in the recommendations thread. :)
I had a look for other novels of the same period recently, and bought The Last English King by Julian Rathbone. I can't recommend it though because I haven't started reading it yet.Am I alone in being reminded of Rudyard Kipling's stories of the Norman knight Sir Richard Dalyngridge (in the children's book Puck of Pook's Hill)? I went back and reread them, and found several similar themes, not just the fairly obvious "Saxon spends several years in Normandy / becomes friends with Norman hero / friends meet again as enemies at Hastings"... but also things like one of the characters protecting the other by sleeping close at hand. Unexpectedly (?) Kipling's Saxon Lady Aeluva is a stronger character than poor little Elfrida. I'm sure Heyer would have known the Kipling stories.
I liked Raoul too but that's about all I liked. Sorry guys but I'm throwing in the towel. Too heavy going for me and too many people to keep track of. And I have WAY too many books to read.
Mod
That's OK Teresa. Believe me, GH's medievals are far harder going than this and
I gave up, pretty much, two or three chapters in. I just couldn't work up interest--and I actually liked Simon the Coldheart, or at least I liked the first two-thirds or so very much. The last chunk, when the "romance" (such as it is) came in, I tend to skim through on rereads--or skip altogether. This one, however...no. Too jumpy by timeline, I haven't liked any of the characters yet, and the language is partly stiff and partly incomprehensible. :( Sorry!
Teresa wrote: "I feel your pain Rachel :)"THANK YOU! :D
Dear Conqueror Friends, I could not post earlier due to some family issues, but wanted to share a marvelous supplement to The Conqueror. I own a large 'coffee table' book on The Bayeux Tapestry, and pulled it out as I was reading October's selection (one of my favorite GH's I should add). If you can find a copy at your local library, The Bayeux Tapestry is a remarkable history companion piece. The Tapestry is claimed to have been the design work of Matilda, with many contributing to the needlework. The panels are a remarkable history and follow Ms. Hayer's story very well. Regards to all GH Fans - Mary
This animated version of the Bayeux Tapestry is fun to watch:http://www.heritagedaily.com/2016/04/...
It starts with Harold's coronation, ie about halfway through the original tapestry.
Mod
http://www.heritagedaily.com/2016/04/...
It starts with Harold's coronation, ie about halfway through the..."
Wow, that was awesome!
Have any of you seen the applique version of the Bayeux Tapestry being made by Pam Holland, an Australian quilter? Seehttp://texasquiltmuseum.org/bayeau-ta...
Mod
http://texasquiltmuseum.org/bayeau-ta..."
Wow that is beautiful & so vivid!
The appliqué version is indeed beautiful :-)But this from the commentary is just weird:
"The textile was the only readily available record depicting the critically important battle that led to the writing of the Magna Carta. The Magna Carta, or “Great Charter,” is the first document to establish the rights of people to be governed by law rather than be subject to the whim of kings or lords."
Battle of Hastings: 1066. Magna Carta: 1215. It's stretching things a bit to say that one led to the other. I wonder whether they meant the writing of the Domesday Book? Or if they were just hopelessly confused about English history?
That is odd!! I know that here in Waterford we were given the Magna Carta way back in time. I think King John was here or something like that. For someone who loves history you'd think I'd know more about this :0. Disgraceful.
I've just looked for King John & Waterford and discovered that John gave Waterford its first town charter ("charter of incorporation") in 1205 "with murage and all free customs, liberties, and privileges enjoyed by the burgesses of Bristol." Not sure why the burgesses of Bristol were involved? Was there a trading link between the two ports? Or does it just mean that Waterford's charter was copied from that of Bristol?http://www.libraryireland.com/topog/W...
I'm ashamed to say you know more than I do!!! (hides head in shame). But I will look into it. A wonderful medieval museum opened up here some time ago and I keep promising myself a visit. I know there's something there about it.
Alathea wrote: "The appliqué version is indeed beautiful :-)But this from the commentary is just weird:
"The textile was the only readily available record depicting the critically important battle that led to t..."
Alathea - you are absolutely correct. To attempt to link the Battle of Hastings with Magna Carta is beyond inaccurate and misleading!! Goodness knows where some of these folk studied history!! Magna Carta has become the example (from which many constitutions have subsequently been written), about the rights of the ordinary man and of the rule of law. Whilst it was essentially a peace treaty between John and his barons, it nonetheless established important rules about the power of kings etc.
http://www.thefinertimes.com/Middle-A...
It maybe that the comment referred to the system of laws and courts which the Normans imposed on England. Abuses under this system led eventually to the Magna Carta. Just my theory ...
Another Battle of Hastings / Bayeux Tapestry tribute:http://www.bricktothepast.com/hasting...
... in Lego bricks.
If things seem to be getting a bit frivolous now (Lego bricks? honestly...) I'll get back to being serious, and say that I have now finished Julian Rathbone's The Last English King, and enjoyed it far more than The Conqueror. It's told from the Saxon side, and I found that Rathbone's style makes it far easier to follow what's going on. The Conqueror is full of characters, particularly the various noblemen around Raoul and William, who never really come to life and are immediately forgotten until the next time they pop up and you try to remember who they are; whereas Rathbone seems to portray his characters in a way that gives them both character and a sense of physical presence. It's also very visual: you can see places and people in a way that you can't with The Conqueror. I find that Heyer relies on using archaic and unfamiliar words to create a sense of history, and for me at least it doesn't work. Right at the beginning when she describes the market at Falaise, she has cubebs, cannelle, franklins, wastel bread, falding, sendal... If you don't know what all these things are, do you put the book down to look them up, or plow on with a general sense that it's historical? It's as though she prefers to use old words whether or not the reader will understand them, rather than describe the cloths or the spices in ways which make them immediate to the reader. She uses the same technique in the Regency novels, naming types of cloth, styles of gowns, bonnets, and foodstuffs without actually describing them, but it seems to work better there. Even in the Regencies she overdoes it sometimes, and gives the impression that having done so much research she's determined to use all of it. But in the Regencies she creates scenes and characters which are much more alive than anything in The Conqueror.
Rathbone won't be to everyone's taste, but if reading The Conqueror has made you want to re
... posted too soon. That last paragraph should have been:
"Rathbone won't be to everyone's taste, but if The Conqueror has made you want to read about this period from a different point of view and in a very different style, it's worth trying."
message 33:
by
Carol She's So Novel꧁꧂ , Madam Mod
(last edited Nov 01, 2016 09:11AM)
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars
Mod
That last paragraph should have been:
"Rathbone won't be to everyone's taste, but if The Conqueror has made you want to read about this period from a different point of vie..."
If you press the edit button on the bottom right of your posts Alathea you can add more to the posts. I do it all the time. I'm a terrible typist.
The Rathbone book sounds like what I'm looking for, Alathea. I've put a "to read" on it.
& I love Lego but... :D
Part of the reason GH's technique works better in the Regencies is that there are more of them. You learn about sprig muslin or expressions like "to make a cake of yourself"in one book & you know what it means for the next. But her Regency characters to breathe more.
I love this book but I do prefer The Conqueror's Wife This is a cautious recommendation as it has been at least 35 years since I read it.
