Our Shared Shelf discussion
Archive
>
The stigma of body Image revisited.
date
newest »


i personally think your second question speaks to the 'masculine' look of bulked up muscles. that may be a matter of personal taste. some people see it as masculine looking, while others see the work, energy, power, dedication, etc. behind it. my opinion.

Thanks for the grammar correction. "Thee months ago I could not spell Human, now I are one."
As what the RadFem says:
Masculinity and Femininity, as they are tagged to certain groups, is a social construct.
I believe, with no actual research, just internet reading/convo, is that women are conditioned to be "soft and fluffy" and view "bulking" as unattractive.
Exasperated by the fact that most of the bulking seen, in both sexes, in photos is from steroids; at 2ish% body fat; and very dehydrated.

Fancy (past my pay grade)way of saying weight lifting"
Ah, I see.
Don't know about it being frowned upon, but I do wonder why anybody would do this for fun... (might well be they think the same about reading exercises - librobic? -, though).

but, the steroid-infused bulked-up bodies of either sex i find unattractive because they seem so fake, so unnatural. i used to read weight-lifting mags, and that whole competition-body look was just that, to me: a different world, different culture, different expectations, and different perspectives on beauty. i was never of that world.
a well-toned, muscular body, even one enhanced by weight-lifting, looks really good to me, be it male or female or anyone in between. i've heard both men and women express disgust for seeing muscles on women, and i've heard the exact opposite from both. so, i think it's a matter of personal opinion.
What is the causes for expected "norms" of body image in women?
Why is anaerobic exercise, and the subsequent "bulking" so frowned upon?
Will add to later.