Mills AP Lit and Comp discussion
note: This topic has been closed to new comments.
June Post #1: Perfection and The Great Gatsby
date
newest »


I found every character more interesting than the two characters that the entire story was meant to revolve around; Tom was interesting just from the first three chapters and his introduction into the novel, Mr. Wolfsheim was interesting because of his Molar on his suit at his lunch with Nick, and even George and Myrtle Wilson were more interesting to me than Gatsby and Daisy. Maybe this was the point however, that they would both be easy characters to relate to, as lost love and old dreams are things many people can relate to. The only thing that makes Gatsby likeable is his great ambition toward his dreams, and being poor before his riches. An ability to relate to his problems makes me slightly more interested, but Daisy has always been just some rich girl who plays with multiple men, and she becomes even more unlikable letting Gatsby die for her, and running away with Tom.
Not to discredit this novel of its achievements, it is very easy to read and that’s because it is damn near perfect. The plot is easy to believe as a real world story, and the characters equally believable. I found myself at the end of the book, where Nick was saying goodbye to Jordan, and I noticed it was supposed to show nick not holding onto a dream, saying goodbye to a girl he “halfway loved” but there was more resolve in the story there for me, than when Daisy and Gatsby’s relationship ended with Myrtle and Gatsby’s death.
This topic has been frozen by the moderator. No new comments can be posted.
Books mentioned in this topic
The Great Gatsby (other topics)The Great Gatsby (other topics)
The Great Gatsby (other topics)
The most of the book is tolled by Nick as his opinions slowly become less and less unique always allowing for room for all the more dramatic and charismatic characters of the book. He is more of a narrator that is there to introduce settings and describe characters, major and minor, in more detail than e ever will describe him self in. Even getting into more specific memories (which the narrator never shares his own with the audience). It is as if Nick is being reluctantly dragged along by all the other characters from one scene to the next and always tends to blend with the background as he makes rather general remarks that rely on the reader filling in the blanks as to what emotion they associate with the occurring. One could interpret it as keeping the leading character relatable in theory, but in practice it left me as the reader confused as to what were the main character's intentions and his general sense of character.