CLOG - Comedy Literature Only Group discussion
Quick question ...
date
newest »


In one book I later converted it into a new short first chapter, then a full page illustration before the book proper.

Info dumping in a preface or prologue is no better than info dumping in the first chapter.
But it is true that some genres are more preface/ prologue friendly than others. Fantasy, for example.
I'd be inclined to agree with Will. An info dump is seldom a good thing wherever you decide to put it. I've seen prologues work well when they describe something that happens in a different time - either long before the action or in the future, when the story is then told in retrospect. However, even then there's the question whether that should still just be called chapter one.

My idea is the situation that would be 'preface' is happening at the same time as the event I have penciled for Chapter 1. The 'preface' bit would end succinctly with a (one sentence) statement explaining the basic reason leading to what is (at the same time- ish) happening in 'Chapter 1.'
The story is told in retrospect. It will probably fit into the 'fantasy' category.
That said, I guess the 'preface' could easily become Chapter 1 if it's best to avoid the 'P' word in general.
Cheers.

The only time I've see a P work is in something like a Victorian novel where the transcriber puts some background into the author's history (Sherlock Holmes HotB might have some of ACD's back story, explaining where Grimpen Mire was, and how the author came to be there etc.)
Otherwise, leave the Prologue to Frankie Howerd.
A quick question - I'm sure I read somewhere that having a preface to your book is naff; that readers simply skip over and jump into the first chapter.
I could probably do with one, to avoid a sort of info dump in a conversation in the first chapter. What do you reckon?