Doorways in the Sand discussion
Doorways in the Sand
>
Chap 4 to 6: Saved by a wombat to the Rhennius machine
date
newest »

message 1:
by
carol.
(new)
Apr 04, 2016 05:04PM

reply
|
flag
If somebody would tell me about the events of these chapters BEFORE I read the book I would be sure he/she was pulling my leg. Zelazny made it work in the book.

Probably just the donkey was an exaggeration, right? :) So glad that you are enjoying it, Jason. I agree, it taps into a lot of the absurdist tradition in fantasy that is so wonderful.
First time through, I didn't get why the wombat and kangaroo at all, and was kind of unamused (I was so serious then!). I think Zelazny is a visual writer as much as a plot writer--he's often working to create an image. If I take the time to join in, it's kind of fun. And it works with Fred's hallucinations, right?
First time through, I didn't get why the wombat and kangaroo at all, and was kind of unamused (I was so serious then!). I think Zelazny is a visual writer as much as a plot writer--he's often working to create an image. If I take the time to join in, it's kind of fun. And it works with Fred's hallucinations, right?

I have had some difficult reading, because of the way he start with a fact and come back to tell the story. This break the pace and confuse me. There are a lot of funny characters here, but often he stop the story to philosophizing about life, people and other things.
I'm sure there are many references to other authors and books here, but I found only Lewis Carroll.
Oh, the pun-ishment:
"in the fall they started a Geology program. I mined that for a year and a half."
"in the fall they started a Geology program. I mined that for a year and a half."

Oh, Jason, that is so cool! I'm near the point where he has that turn around, and I think you are on to it--it's the first confirmation he cares.
Oh wait--was it because he was reversed?
Oh wait--was it because he was reversed?


<> After wandering around in utter confusion for the first few chapters, I found the conversation with Hal exceedingly helpful in grounding myself. For all the hallucinatory imagery that abounds in this book, at its heart it seems (at least at this stage), a fairly straightforward 'Who's got the MacGuffin?"/Maltese Falcon plot.
<> This being written in the 70s, I find myself asking if drugs were involved. Probably not, but it still has this very dreamy affect, the jumping around in time, the aliens-who-are-dressed-as-animals, the random bacchanals...
<> Speaking of which, I enjoyed the Bacchanal entirely too much. Even if I mostly know of 'Evoe! Evoe!' from my illicit fondness for musical theater (apropos of which: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XM-cw... ).
Mikhail--it is so interesting to follow your thoughts. I thought Zelazny did a nice job grounding us without too obviously using the "as you know..." type of dialogue. The moments of heightened reflection (ha!) were perfect. You nailed that fairly straightforward--or reversed--MacGuffin. ;)
I feel fairly confident drugs were involved at some point.
I had to look up Evoe! And that was a very bizarre song.
I feel fairly confident drugs were involved at some point.
I had to look up Evoe! And that was a very bizarre song.

Anyway, my read on it is that at a certain point Zelazny looked at his plot and decided that between the wombat-aliens, the random thugs, interplanetary kula chains, that *maybe* he ought to corral his readers before throwing in a bunch of new oddities. It's an infodump, but it's a very sparse and elegant one, and it feels quite natural in the text -- yes, the reader is confused, but so are Fred and Hal, and them talking things over is highly appropriate.
I will also note that it is rather satisfying to have protagonists who actually use their brains on occasion.