Around the World in 80 Books discussion

Never Let Me Go
This topic is about Never Let Me Go
88 views
Group Reads Discussions > Discussion for Never Let Me Go

Comments Showing 1-9 of 9 (9 new)    post a comment »
dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by Diane , Armchair Tour Guide (new) - rated it 4 stars

Diane  | 12949 comments Start discussion here for Never Let Me Go by Kazuo Ishiguro.


message 2: by Diane , Armchair Tour Guide (new) - rated it 4 stars

Diane  | 12949 comments From Litlovers.com:

Summary
From the acclaimed author of The Remains of the Day and When We Were Orphans, a moving new novel that subtly reimagines our world and time in a haunting story of friendship and love.

As a child, Kathy—now thirty-one years old—lived at Hailsham, a private school in the scenic English countryside where the children were sheltered from the outside world, brought up to believe that they were special and that their well-being was crucial not only for themselves but for the society they would eventually enter. Kathy had long ago put this idyllic past behind her, but when two of her Hailsham friends come back into her life, she stops resisting the pull of memory.

And so, as her friendship with Ruth is rekindled, and as the feelings that long ago fueled her adolescent crush on Tommy begin to deepen into love, Kathy recalls their years at Hailsham. She describes happy scenes of boys and girls growing up together, unperturbed—even comforted—by their isolation. But she describes other scenes as well: of discord and misunderstanding that hint at a dark secret behind Hailsham’s nurturing facade. With the dawning clarity of hindsight, the three friends are compelled to face the truth about their childhood-and about their lives now.

A tale of deceptive simplicity, Never Let Me Go slowly reveals an extraordinary emotional depth and resonance-and takes its place among Kazuo Ishiguro’s finest work. (From the publisher.)

Discussion Questions

1. Kathy introduces herself as an experienced carer. She prides herself on knowing how to keep her donors calm, "even before fourth donation" [p. 3]. How long does it take for the meaning of such terms as "donation," "carer," and "completed" to be fully revealed?

2. Kathy addresses us directly, with statements like "I don't know how it was where you were, but at Hailsham we used to have some form of medical every week" [p. 13], and she thinks that we too might envy her having been at Hailsham [p. 4]. What does Kathy assume about anyone she might be addressing, and why?

3. Why is it important for Kathy to seek out donors who are "from the past," "people from Hailsham" [p. 5]? She learns from a donor who'd grown up at an awful place in Dorset that she and her friends at Hailsham had been really "lucky" [p. 6]. How does the irony of this designation grow as the novel goes on? What does Hailsham represent for Kathy, and why does she say at the end that Hailsham is "something no one can take away" [p. 287]?

4. Kathy tells the reader, "How you were regarded at Hailsham, how much you were liked and respected, had to do with how good you were at 'creating'" [p. 16]. What were Hailsham's administrators trying to achieve in attaching a high value tocreativity?

5. Kathy's narration is the key to the novel's disquieting effect. First person narration establishes a kind of intimacy between narrator and reader. What is it like having direct access to Kathy's mind and feelings? How would the novel be different if narrated from Tommy's point of view, or Ruth's, or Miss Emily's?

6. What are some of Ruth's most striking character traits? How might her social behavior, at Hailsham and later at the Cottages, be explained? Why does she seek her "possible" so earnestly [pp. 159-67]?

7. One of the most notable aspects of life at Hailsham is the power of the group. Students watch each other carefully and try on different poses, attitudes, and ways of speaking. Is this behavior typical of most adolescents, or is there something different about the way the students at Hailsham seek to conform?

8. How do Madame and Miss Emily react to Kathy and Tommy when they come to request a deferral? Defending her work at Hailsham, Miss Emily says, "Look at you both now! You've had good lives, you're educated and cultured" [p. 261]. What is revealed in this extended conversation, and how do these revelations affect your experience of the story?

9. Why does Tommy draw animals? Why does he continue to work on them even after he learns that there will be no deferral?

10. Kathy reminds Madame of the scene in which Madame watched her dancing to a song on her Judy Bridgewater tape. How is Kathy's interpretation of this event different from Madame's? How else might it be interpreted? Is the song's title again recalled by the book's final pages [pp. 286-88]?

11. After their visit to Miss Emily and Madame, Kathy tells Tommy that his fits of rage might be explained by the fact that "at some level you always knew" [p. 275]. Does this imply that Kathy didn't? Does it imply that Tommy is more perceptive than Kathy?

12. Does the novel examine the possibility of human cloning as a legitimate question for medical ethics, or does it demonstrate that the human costs of cloning are morally repellent, and therefore impossible for science to pursue? What kind of moral and emotional responses does the novel provoke? If you extend the scope of the book's critique, what are its implications for our own society?

13. The novel takes place in "the late 1990s," and a postwar science boom has resulted in human cloning and the surgical harvesting of organs to cure cancer and other diseases. In an interview with January Magazine Ishiguro said that he is not interested in realism.* In spite of the novel's fictitious premise, however, how "realistically" does Never Let Me Go reflect the world we live in, where scientific advancement can be seemingly irresistible?

14. The teacher Lucy Wainright wanted to make the children more aware of the future that awaited them. Miss Emily believed that in hiding the truth, "We were able to give you something, something which even now no one will ever take from you, and we were able to do that principally by sheltering you. . . . Sometimes that meant we kept things from you, lied to you.... But...we gave you your childhoods" [p. 268]. In the context of the story as a whole, is this a valid argument?

15. Is it surprising that Miss Emily admits feeling revulsion for the children at Hailsham? Does this indicate that she believes Kathy and Tommy are not fully human? What is the nature of the moral quandary Miss Emily and Madame have gotten themselves into?

16. Critic Frank Kermode has noted that "Ishiguro is fundamentally a tragic novelist; there is always a disaster, remote but urgent, imagined but real, at the heart of his stories" [London Review of Books, April 21, 2005]. How would you describe the tragedy at the heart of Never Let Me Go?

17. Some reviewers have expressed surprise that Kathy, Tommy, and their friends never try to escape their ultimate fate. They cling to the possibility of deferral, but never attempt to vanish into the world of freedom that they view from a distance. Yet they love the film The Great Escape, "the moment the American jumps over the barbed wire on his bike" [p. 99]. Why might Ishiguro have chosen to present them as fully resigned to their early deaths?

18. Reread the novel's final paragraph, in which Kathy describes a flat, windswept field with a barbed wire fence "where all sorts of rubbish had caught and tangled." She imagines Tommy appearing here in "the spot where everything I'd ever lost since my childhood had washed up" [p. 287]. What does the final sentence indicate about Kathy's state of mind as she faces her losses and her own death-stoicism, denial, courage, resolution?

19. In a recent interview, Ishiguro talked about Never Let Me Go: "There are things I am more interested in than the clone thing. How are they trying to find their place in the world and make sense of their lives? To what extent can they transcend their fate? As time starts to run out, what are the things that really matter? Most of the things that concern them concern us all, but with them it is concertinaed into this relatively short period of time. These are things that really interest me and, having come to the realization that I probably have limited opportunities to explore these things, that's what I want to concentrate on. I can see the appeal of travel books and journalism and all the rest of it and I hope there will be time to do them all one day. But I just don't think that day is now." How do these remarks relate to your own ideas about the book? [Interview with Nicholas Wroe, the Guardian, February 2, 2005.]
(Questions issued by publisher.)


message 3: by Kristina Marie (last edited May 05, 2014 05:45PM) (new) - rated it 3 stars

Kristina Marie | 274 comments I read this in 2010 and liked the book, but I just wish the characters cared more for their lives. Why did they just take it (or rather, accept it)?


message 4: by Christine (last edited May 05, 2014 06:27PM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

Christine Kristina Marie wrote: "I read this in 2010 and liked the book, but I just wish the characters cared more for their lives. Why did they just take it (or rather, accept it)?"

This is an interesting question. It seems like a few of them did sometimes think about what they would like to do with their lives. (view spoiler) But also, I think that in reality many people simply cannot summon the will and energy to fight against a system that feels powerful and overwhelming, or perhaps the systems in which they live are so deeply ingrained that it doesn't even occur to them to do so. How else have large groups of people been oppressed throughout history? I think that we tend to like to read stories about the few individuals who DO choose to "fight the power", so to speak, but those individuals are the minority until a revolution occurs.

(view spoiler)

ETA: I think this same question could be asked about African slaves in the US south, or about women as a group who have been oppressed in countless cultures for many many centuries. Why did THEY just take it? I think the answers would have some similarities.


Christine I wonder if this is part of what troubled Miss Lucy. (I think that was the one guardian's name? Sorry, already returned my copy to the library!) Children at their school were obviously educated, but I would assume that the curriculum was carefully chosen to suit the purposes of the program. However, (view spoiler)


message 6: by Sarah (last edited May 05, 2014 07:38PM) (new) - rated it 4 stars

Sarah | 662 comments This is the one book I read alone and went crazy. I had no one reading with me to discuss. Very disturbing book. I will follow the discussion and already see some great points made.


Kristina Marie | 274 comments Christine wrote: "I think this same question could be asked about African slaves in the US south, or about women as a group who have been oppressed in countless cultures for many many centuries. Why did THEY just take it? I think the answers would have some similarities."

That's very true. People know that these things go on and don't stop it. But, there are runaways, rebellions, and deaths in oppressed cultures/areas. Maybe if this story continued we would see some sort of organized rebellion and fight for rights, too.


RitaSkeeter wrote: "I think they were also 'indoctrinated' right from birth that this was their life's purpose and this message was continually given to them. If their whole life was built around this, and all their ..."

Being indoctrinated would have to have something to do with it. If they weren't so conditioned then maybe they would want to change.


message 8: by Diane , Armchair Tour Guide (new) - rated it 4 stars

Diane  | 12949 comments This book is on sale on Kindle for $2.99.


Alana (alanasbooks) | 101 comments Christine's point is pretty much what I was thinking. My core screams at me "It's not right! Why aren't they fighting?" But things like these dystopian futures where the kids rise up and fight against the establishment are all well and good, but just don't represent the norm. All of us, in each of our cultures around the world, live with things every day that we don't like or even hate, because we just don't feel that our little voice is enough to change or make a difference. Or I'm content with my bit of world and just don't feel the urgency to change it, to make the effort. It's sad, but that is often how we live.


back to top

unread topics | mark unread


Books mentioned in this topic

Never Let Me Go (other topics)

Authors mentioned in this topic

Kazuo Ishiguro (other topics)