Doorways in the Sand discussion
Doorways in the Sand
>
Ready, set, go! (initial thoughts through Chapter 3)
message 1:
by
carol.
(new)
Mar 01, 2016 04:25PM

reply
|
flag

He was such an interesting man. I sat in on his reading of A Night in the Lonesome October and he was so enthusiastic he got up on the table and did all the characters in voices.
He was pretty far with his cancer at the time, he had lost a lot of weight, but he was so damn full of life.
Of course I'm excited to read one of his best novels again. :) Well, I still love Lord of Light best, but his imagination is tops. :)
Oh my goodness, what an experience, Brad. I think watching him perform October would have been amazing.


First Appearance "Analog Science Fiction- Science Fact" June, July, August 1975,
First Published Hardcover 1976 / Harper & Row / 181 pages
--- CAUTION POSSIBLE SPOILERS ---
The will of Fred Cassidy’s cryogenically-frozen uncle provides him with a generous stipend to attend the university until he is awarded an academic degree. By carefully choosing his courses and changing majors, Fred avoids mandatory graduation for thirteen years. (view spoiler)
Oh, you might want to spoiler that one, Karl. I think most of the people I invited have read it, but some haven't.
Although half the beauty for me in the book are the ideas and the language. I read it for plot the first time, and i didn't enjoy it as much as subsequent reads, when I had more life/reading under my belt and could appreciate references and the like. "Not a cognito or a sum to my name" *giggle*
I'm hoping one of you is better at math than I am--my review mentions some sort of math puzzle I didn't get.
Although half the beauty for me in the book are the ideas and the language. I read it for plot the first time, and i didn't enjoy it as much as subsequent reads, when I had more life/reading under my belt and could appreciate references and the like. "Not a cognito or a sum to my name" *giggle*
I'm hoping one of you is better at math than I am--my review mentions some sort of math puzzle I didn't get.

Oh, that was a nice summary--I wouldn't want you to waste all that work--just that the (view spoiler) is a twist. It might be useful for people that may not have time to re-read but want to share thoughts. I had forgotten how the MC's broad education benefits him.
I'd spoiler it after the first paragraph.
I'd spoiler it after the first paragraph.

-- Please be my guest, I am not too familure with the magic tricks of GR --

If you click on the 'some html is ok' link in the upper right of the comment box, you can copy and paste the spoiler tags if that's easier; they are as Brad described. I don't think mods can edit comments for people; they can only delete.
Amy's right, I can't edit.
Where you want to put a spoiler, type a "<" then the word "spoiler" then the other ">" Just leave out all the quotation marks.
Ah, the days when I tried to figure out the wonky html system.
Where you want to put a spoiler, type a "<" then the word "spoiler" then the other ">" Just leave out all the quotation marks.
Ah, the days when I tried to figure out the wonky html system.


Regards, all!
Athena--thanks! Your first link is broken. The second--fun. I can attest--Steven Brust's Taltos series is definitely "first person smart ass." :)

The short stories? Yes Carol, yes you DO want them. You want to read them & review the collection on GR. When you wake up you'll remember you WANT the collection …
html insert hypnotic suggestion end-html
;)

Where you want to put a spoiler, type a "" Just leave out all the quotation marks.
Ah, the days when I tried to figure out the wonky html system."
-- Thanks for the hint, all taken care of.... --

Are you sure you are not mixing up Roger Zelazny and Robert Jordan? The latter was a real smoking pipe enthusiast.
I think in Dan S.'s review of Dodos and extinct things, he mentioned that pipes were covered along with typewriters and VHS tapes. There was a brief resurgence of smoking/pipe shops around here about 5 years ago, but honestly, I haven't seen anyone smoking a pipe in ages. Are they an anachronism now?



Really enjoying Fred's acrophilia & dismissing the semi-heard or -seen questions: "Do you see me, red?", "Do you smell me, ded?" etc. Jeepers, do we think these will go somewhere in the plot? ;)

British New Wave was more exoerimental with authors like Ballard, Aldiss and Moorcock. But those authors helped to bring in other aspects than Science to SF.
For this, I love them :)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRQ4w...
--
Oh, thanks, Karl. I just posted the first sentence on my update and had a couple of thoughts--first, holy crapload of commas! Second, Zelazny love describing sky in liquid metaphors. I have one picked out in a short story anthology where he compares Venus' sunrise to coffee and milk (he called them cloud curdles here). Third, love how he never said Fred is looking at the sky.

Fred Cassidy is a strange character, a lifetime student, embroiled in a strange story.
This thing of climbing building is strange. I mean, who is this guy? Spiderman. Interesting (view spoiler)
I'm looking forward to read the nex, tomorrow.

Oh my goodness, Jason, yes--I totally wanted to be Fred Cassidy. Not the climbing part, but the being in school forever and knowing a fair amount about everything. It does rather remind me of younger, more hedonistic time period, although I laughed when administration had to make a climbing rule due to Fred.
I'm thinking about starting a new thread for references--what do you think? So many direct and indirect. On pg 3 the professor "utters a labial consonant" which is what people are always doing to Bertie Wooster in Wodehouse books (which often means they are snorting at him).
The part you mention, Andrew--the end references a Yeats poem (""I spit into the face of Time that has transfigured me." ---reference The Lamentation of the Old Pensioner"), which I had to look up. The "widening gyre" is the opposite of a Yeats poem about death and a "narrowing gyre."
I didn't attack the math poem at all :)
I'm thinking about starting a new thread for references--what do you think? So many direct and indirect. On pg 3 the professor "utters a labial consonant" which is what people are always doing to Bertie Wooster in Wodehouse books (which often means they are snorting at him).
The part you mention, Andrew--the end references a Yeats poem (""I spit into the face of Time that has transfigured me." ---reference The Lamentation of the Old Pensioner"), which I had to look up. The "widening gyre" is the opposite of a Yeats poem about death and a "narrowing gyre."
I didn't attack the math poem at all :)

Oh, yes. I always said that if I had enough money, I 'd like to travel and keep taking all kind of classes :D

In other thoughts, I recognize that Zelazny is going for a sort of witty, jaunty, ironic, hard boiled tone here, what with the whole world and its nephew searching for the Maltese Star-stone, but even given the pastiche, which he is doing well, I still felt the torture scene was just a bit too lighthearted. The man's old friend and roommate has been found in a park without his internal organs, and Fred himself acknowledges that he fears mutilation, and yet Fred's narrative voice, describing their treatment of him, remains defiantly playful. I wonder if we are meant to feel any real threat from these guys, or legitimately care for the stakes, or whether the witty, lighthearted, hard-boiled style is going to be more important throughout the book than tension or suspense. Well, we'll see...

The first three chapters are almost a how-it's-done manual for writers. He just drops us into this lovely world (I like Jason's remark above about drunken professors climbing and counting), where aliens have the Mona Lisa and the Crown Jewels (love the kula chain) and an eternal student with spending money just waltzes off to Austrailia for an unauthorized dig.
The conversation with Professor Dobson is one of my all time favorite moments in SFF. For me, it just skirts the edge of an info dump, giving the reader a lot of information, but framing it in terms of the wonder and philosophy of two committed students of life and living is brilliant and very engaging.
The opening of chapter three is just astoundingly good. I'm not sure I agree that the torture is too light; I get the distinct impression that Fred is deliberately choosing a certain lightheartedness as his own personal take on Stoicism - this is a man who thinks of being gnawed to death by an animal 'could be a small measure of triumph,' presumably because his captors wouldn't get what they wanted. Fred turns out to be tougher than chapter one suggests. I didn't feel any lack of danger; they did cut Paul Byler's innards out, after all. (Not the roommate, Hal's, though. Paul was the geology professor.) YMMV, of course.
And then we get a talking wombat and kangaroo. Love.

Instead of my usual gulping reading habit I'm enjoying this as a much-anticipated fine meal. How not? Zelazny's ease with unusual English words married my poetry & myth-reference Joneses in the opening lines of Ch.3, reread over & over:
Sunflash, some splash. Darkle. Stardance.(I found the Phaeton reference particularly intensified the feeling of danger Fred faced while bound in that terrible AUS desert sun.)
Phaeton's solid gold Cadillac crashed where there was no ear to hear, lay burning, flickered, went out. Like me.
Andreas, I'm curious how these lines worked for you when read in translation? Especially that unusual, almost archaic word 'Darkle' - did it feel poetic at all in the sense of poetry often using the barest bones of words to create a feeling?
I'll start the thread, and please add Phaeton, Athena, so I don't have to look it up. :)
https://www.goodreads.com/topic/show/...
https://www.goodreads.com/topic/show/...

Gods bless hyperlinks-I'd be at this Mac all day otherwise!
:)
Books mentioned in this topic
A Night in the Lonesome October (other topics)Lord of Light (other topics)