2-3-4 Challenge Book Discussions #1 discussion
When Gods Die
>
Question E
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Monica
(new)
Feb 16, 2016 09:27PM
Mod
reply
|
flag
It is definitely a more complex plot than in the first book and as I have a love (obsession) with English history, it was very appealing to me. I'm not sure that there will be more of a focus on this particular political theme as history has played itself out in this regard.
I was unaware of the conspiracy, in this period. I do enjoy learning history in its multi-layered complexity. Even a peek at part of it, if that part makes sense in the story, is helpful for the plot and for holding my interest.
Charlene wrote: "I was unaware of the conspiracy, in this period."Yes, it is the 18th century that is more famous for the Jacobite uprisings.
I thought it was an interesting twist on things that the conspirators in the 19th century wanted to put Anne of Savoy on the throne instead of the wastrel Regent.
It is indeed interesting to think, given the time period, that some men would prefer to put a female on the throne when a male was readily available. Here's a cheer for that sentiment, at least!
I didn't realise that such a conspiracy had existed, however it doesn't surprise me with all that I have read about the excesses of the Regent while the common people starved.
I was pleasantly surprised at the level of political intrigue in this story. There were so many threads to weave, which I love. Kept me guessing until the end.
I also found it ironic that Davina Porter narrated this story as she's the narrator for the Outlander series. When the Stuart connection was introduced, all I could do was smile.
I also found it ironic that Davina Porter narrated this story as she's the narrator for the Outlander series. When the Stuart connection was introduced, all I could do was smile.



