What's the Name of That Book??? discussion
Just to chat
>
Name a book that everyone else seems to love, but that you hated

Though some of the dialogue was somewhat humorous, the characters were lame, the story was lame, and it just made ZERO SENSE. ..."
Dito, hated Q and never understood why they would even look for Margo, after all she wasn't exactly a winning persona.
Laurie wrote: "Gosh, the heroine of Outlander had sex 10 times in the first 20 pages of that book and I couldn't continue reading...."
Don't remember it having that much sex, and I actually sort of enjoyed it (far as you can enjoy a bodice ripper) until I came to a certain spoiler that made me close the book about hundred pages in and vow to never return to it.

I was also trying to express my disappointment about Outlander as well; I was expecting an intelligent HF book about a period in history that I was looking forward to learning more about and instead I got a trashy, bodice ripper.
https://www.goodreads.com/list/show/9... is a new list I started a few days ago over on listopia and I'd like to invite you and everyone else commenting here to check it out and vote on the Best Trashy Novels - which is meant to be a light hearted take on trashy novels we might be ashamed to admit that we read.
And yes, Outlander is on that list :D

That actually brings up a wonderful point. A pet hate of mine is when a book is marketed as one thing and is a totally different thing. Word of mouth, covers and blurbs all play a part in that.

Hello Elle, and I appreciate your input. Now I'm really confused as some of my very literary friends praised Outlander to the high heavens due to its accurate and fascinating historical account of that era in Scottish history.
So what's a girl to do??
I'm glad that so many people were able to enjoy Outlander though and with its many sequels the author must be doing something right. Maybe when I was a virginal teen I could've appreciated this book more but at my current age it bored me to death.
Elle, I'd like to invite you to vote on my new list:
https://www.goodreads.com/list/show/9.... This list is very tongue in cheek and meant to be fun but I'd love to hear your comments on a few of these books - feel free to add more :D

Had a look at the list yesterday, it's fun :)

If I had say what Outlander was, I'd say it was historical fiction but maybe it's because I don't really care about genres and I am not used to romance or especially "bodice ripper" novels, I associate them always to Harlequins and like and expect more from the "real" books. I don't really understand why they have to have so much sex in them, it's so boring. I like historical fiction and would like a bit of romance in them, too, but I guess I have to stay away from them.

Reminded me a bit of a review I read about a set of early Ann Rice novels.
She does have a line in it that made me inappropriately smile when one of the guys who rescued her objects to raping her but as she notices on not exactly moral grounds.
So yeah, it's definitely a Bodice Ripper, but not a very historical accurate one I would hope.

I also tend to, when I think about Outlander, think about the whole series rather than just the one book. And that probably also colors my perception of it.
There are certainly high points of drama and action and then there is every day life - which I loved reading. In fact, one of the books is soooo incredibly boring because that's all it is, 1200 pages of everyday life during that time period. Which I found boring but also fascinating. The Author really does her research and it's interesting to read how people lived during that time.

I LOVED Wuthering Heights the first time I read it - finished in 2 days, couldn't put it down! Tried it again though, and could barely get through it.
As for my own addition to this conversation: The Dark Tower series by Stephen King. Powered my way through the first book (took forever, didn't enjoy it but I didn't give up, after all it's supposed to be so good), gave up on the second.

That was the type of experience I was hoping to have when I tried to read Outlander. I was wanting to experience what it was like to live in that era of Scottish history, become emotionally attached to the characters and learn about history all at the same time as truly great HF books are able to do.
I'm very disappointed that this didn't happen for me.

Had a look at the list yesterday, it's fun :)"
With the time travel story line I can see why you and your friends considered Outlander a fantasy novel and why you were satisfied with the plot and setting.
Since so many labels can be applied to Outlander that may account for it's continued success and wide audience.
So far Outlander can be considered:
Historical Fiction
Romance
Time Travel/Fantasy
Bodice Ripper.
Future authors might want to take notice...

This is exactly what I was thinking Tytti.
Whilst watching the many scenes of copulation in the first half hour of the Outlander series I couldn't help but think:
"OKAY! We get it! Claire is certainly not frigid! Now can we change the subject please?"
I suppose those scenes would've been a little more tolerable if they were done tastefully?

But I don't also like when the authors write too much about the history or how people lived. Though sometimes it works, like in one book the author wrote a lot about preservation but I thought it told a lot about the character and I think there was a reason for it, too. Another wrote about it mainly for laughs, I think.
I would also be very careful when trying to learn from a historical novel. I know one popular book that disregards one war completely, another author shows that he hasn't even done the basic research for his main character or his background, and people still believe that they are learning from it. They might have something correct but it might be difficult to guess what.

Fifty Shades of Grey
Lolita
Slave to Sensation
Crime and Punishment
On the Road
Gone with the Wind
Summer House with Swimming Pool
Also anything by Nicholas Sparks or Jane Austen
But you know, to each their own...

I can understand 50 Shades because by all accounts even the writing is poor, not to mention the "plot". But (most of) the others are considered by many to be great literature. Not something you might always love but for their other qualities. Personally I loved GWTW because it was so many things in one book.

Dracula by Bram Stoker
Didn't find either one, in the least bit -chilling!

There's also Fifty Shades of Grey. I finished the books with some efort. Was it just me or the writing of those books went from bad to worse?

I've only tried reading one Kristen Ashley Creed and I gave up pretty quickly. I think I only got 60 pages or so when I had to give up. The characters were speaking English but it really didn't feel like it. I know she was trying to go for a gangsta type feel but it felt so wrong....and annoying. I've never heard people speak 'like that' before, even in gang related movies.

Vicious: How this book has above a 3 is beyond me, I read a lot of webfiction/fantranslated stuff I read a lot of terrible writing and can glaze over it. However the writing in this book was awful even by unedited/2nd language speakers it so overwhelmingly stilted and unnatural it drove me up the wall. But that wasn't even the worst part the worst part is how dumb and irrational all the characters in the book were, none of them made an intelligent decision once and their motivations were so weak and contrived they didn't feel real to me.

I know they are, which is why I read them in the first place. I just don't get the love for them or why they are considered "great" literature. Personally, I found Gone with the Wind dreadfully dull but I've found that I don't care for historical novels and I know that it (GWTW) is loved by many.

Exactly.
The one I tried was Motorcycle Man. The way that the "hero" spoke to the heroine was just awful, it was downright abusive. Then there was the way he was speaking to his children, he called his ex (the mother of his children) a crazy bitch in a conversation with them and a few lines over his son calls the mother a whore or something like that.
I stopped reading when I got to about 100 pages. Terrible book.
I gave it 1 star, I would have gave it -1000 if I could.
Now, when I rate a book that I didn't like all that much I think about how it compares to this one. So far I haven't gave a 1 star to another book. I even moved the ones that I had previously rated with one star up by one because they were way better in comparison :))))


I read GWTW over one weekend when I was 12, and that was after I had seen the movie, so I already knew what was going to happen, so obviously I didn't think it was dull. I think I would have like those characters even if it hadn't been a historical novel but of course they couldn't have existed in another time.

The Night Circus
The Magicians
And most YA novels
to my can't stand list.

The Night Circus
The Magicians
And most YA novels
to my can't stand list."
I didn't hate The Night Circus, but I only rated it 2 stars, so pretty close. I expected it to be waaaay better than it was. Pretty disappointing.

I read the first few pages of The Hobbit (I was probably 12 or 13), couldn't get interested in it. I've never gone back to it.

I think the problem for me was that I was only interested in fantasy from about age 9-11, but the text itself was too complex. By the time I was able to understand the text, my interest in fantasy was over and done with.




I didn't like any of the characters so I had no interest in reading about a bunch of people I dislike.
Tess of the d'Urbevilles
Mainly it just made me mad that she was treated so badly
Some other classics I didn't like are Frankenstein and To Kill a Mockingbird but I think that is mainly because they were required reading in highschool and nothing ruins a book like having pick it apart and write and essay about it.

The Slap. Got a bit further in this one but couldn't stick it out til the end.
Incendiary by Chris Cleave. This is the only book I have ever (tried to) read and then found the movie was better than the book.

The Hobbit
Hated. Hated. Hated."
Heretic!!!
The Hobbit is one of my favorite books of all time.

Jeremy wrote: "Dree wrote: "Dune
The Hobbit
Hated. Hated. Hated."
Heretic!!!
The Hobbit is one of my favorite books of all time."



Have to admit I got bored with THG very quickly and it was only the completionist in me that caused me to finish the trilogy even though I figured out there was only one conclusion.

Woolfie wrote: "I suppose I keep reading YA in the desperate hope that I'm surprised with something that's actually good, not much luck so far :p"
You sound like a good candidate for adult literature then.
You sound like a good candidate for adult literature then.

I picked up The Hunger Games because of all the buzz, thinking why not, it's not a genre I normally read but it might be fun. I put it down within 3 minutes when I discovered it's written in the present tense, which I don't do as it gives me hives.

Jeremy wrote: "Dree wrote: "Dune
The Hobbit
Hated. Hated. Hated."
Heretic!!!
[book:The Hobbit|..."
Sorry, if you saw my statement as harsh, Dree. I was just joking with you, but that doesn't always come across through text.
Books mentioned in this topic
Dark Carnival (other topics)One Hundred Years of Solitude (other topics)
The Great Gatsby (other topics)
To Kill a Mockingbird (other topics)
On the Road (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Ray Bradbury (other topics)Thomas Hardy (other topics)
Josh Lanyon (other topics)
Gillian Flynn (other topics)
Gregory Maguire (other topics)
More...
Though some of the dialogue was somewhat humorous, the characters were lame, the story was lame, and it just made ZERO SENSE.
There's a webcomic called The Less Than Epic Adventures of TJ and Amal, and if you want good, funny, heartfelt romance with a road trip that ends with a POINT, go read it.