No proofing?

[Paul]

Actually I don't have comments or questions about the content of the stories, but do have a remark about the production of this edition. It contains a remarkable number of typographical errors, including spurious punctuation marks, split words, run-together sentences. Not in every paragraph, but every few pages. It makes me wonder if perhaps this was compiled from optical character recognition scans of other editions, and they didn't bother to proofread the results. It's not a huge deal, it's just that I've never seen this many errors in a professionally published edition.